城市美學治理之探究：台北市的個案

Exploration of Urban Aesthetics Governance: The Case of Taipei City

10.53106/101632122023030123004

李得全(Te-Chuan Li)；黃怡瑄(Yi-Hsuan Huang)

美學 ； 城市美學 ； 城市設計 ； 城市治理 ； 台北市 ； Aesthetics ； Urban Aesthetics ； Urban Design ； Urban Governance ； Taipei City

建築學報

123期（2023 / 03 / 31）

65 - 85

繁體中文;英文

城市美學治理是哲學，也是科學，因為它不僅反映市民美學的意識、素養與價值，也是城市追求善治的社會學習、公共選擇與城市治理的過程。台北面對全球化新自由主義的浪潮、快速變遷的移民社會與多元文化差異的現實，存在著複雜的美學意識與衝突的價值體系，要尋求台北城市美學的集體共識顯然是艱困與長期的挑戰。本文探究與建立城市美學治理的假說與邏輯架構，發展出一套包含五個漸進式的循環步驟，期待作為推動城市美學治理的程序性操作建議，並以台北市政府城市美學專案辦公室之運作進行實證案例研究。研究發現此一城市美學治理的架構與假說，可作為檢視、評估與精進城市美學治理的理論架構與實務運作之參考，另基於實證研究結果，也提出未來城市美學治理的制度性與操作性計16項具體建議，期能發揮承先起後的作用。

Urban aesthetics governance is both philosophy and science, because it not only reflects the awareness, quality and value of citizens' aesthetics, but also the process of social learning, public choice and urban governance in the city's pursuit of good governance. Facing the tide of global neo-liberalism, the rapidly changing immigrant society and the reality of multicultural differences, Taipei has complex aesthetic consciousness and conflicting value systems. It is obviously difficult and long-term to seek a collective consensus on Taipei's urban aesthetics challenge. This article explores and establishes the hypothesis and logical framework of urban aesthetics governance, and develops a set of five progressive cyclical steps, which is expected to serve as a procedural operational suggestion to promote urban aesthetics governance, and is carried out with the operation of the Urban Aesthetics Project Office of the Taipei City Government empirical case studies. The research found that this framework and hypothesis of urban aesthetics governance can be used as a reference for examining, evaluating and improving the theoretical framework and practical operation of urban aesthetics governance. In addition, based on the results of this empirical research, it is proposed that the future urban aesthetics governance of Taipei City Institutional and operational specific recommendations. In addition, based on the results of this empirical study, sixteen specific suggestions for institutional and operational aspects of urban aesthetics governance in the future are put forward, hoping to play a role of succession.

1. 李得全, T. C.,謝一鋒, Y. F.,羅煊, H.(2021)。都市更新容積獎勵制度之謬誤與導正—以臺北市為例。都市與計劃，48(3)，119-146。
   連結：
2. 李得全, T. C.,周志龍, T. L.(2012)。全球化、後現代之都市設計與空間再結構-台北市信義計畫 30 年之回顧與展望。建築學報，81，125-150。
   連結：
3. Albrechts, L.(1992).New challenges for Urban Policy under a Flexible Regime of Accumulation.Landscape and Urban Planning,22,189-203.
4. Alexander, C.(1979).The Oregon Experiment.NY: USA:Oxford University Press.
5. Alexander, C.(1977).A Pattern Language.NY: USA:Oxford University Press.
6. Alexander, C.(1987).A New Theory of Urban Design.Oxford University Press.
7. Barnett, J.(1982).An Introduction to Urban Design.New York:Harper & Row.
8. Chhotray, V.,Stoker, G.(2009).Governance Theory and Practice: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Cook, R., Jr.(1980).Zoning for Downtown Urban Design.D.C. Heath and Company.
10. Croce, B. (1909). Aesthetic: As Science of Expression and General Linguistic. trans. D. Ainslie, New York: Noonday.
11. Delafons, J.(1991).Design control-the American experience.The Planner,77(40),23-26.
12. Department of Environment(1985).Circular 31/85--Aesthetic Control.London:HMSO.
13. DiGaetano, A.,Strom, E.(2003).Comparative Urban Governance: An Integrated Approach.Urban Affairs Review,38(3),356-396.
14. Friedmann, J.(1987).Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action.NJ:Princeton University Press.
15. Global Platform for Sustainable Cities and World Bank(2018).TOD Implementation Resources & Tools.Washington, DC:World Bank.
16. Granovetter, M.(1973).The Strength of Weak Ties.American Journal of Sociology,78(6),1360-1380.
17. Hackworth, J.(2007).The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism.New York:Cornell University Press.
18. Harvey, D.(1989).From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in late Capitalism.Geografiska Annaler,71B(1),3-17.
19. Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) (2017). TOD Standard. New York: ITDP. Retrieved from: https://www.itdp.org/2017/06/23/tod-standard/
20. Jessop, B.(1998).The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure: The Case of Economic Development.International Social Science Journal,50(155),29-45.
21. Jiang, B.,de Rijke, C.(2021).Structural Beauty: A Structure-Based Computational Approach to Quantifying the Beauty of an Image.Journal of imaging,7(5),78.
22. Lynch, K.(1984).Good City Form.Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
23. Moore, S.,Bunce, S.(2009).Delivering Sustainable Buildings and Communities: Eclipsing Social Concerns Through Private Sector-led Urban Regeneration and Development.Local Environment,14(7),601-606.
24. Pierre, J.(1999).Models of Urban Governance: The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics.Urban Affairs Review,34(3),372-396.
25. Punter, J.(1992).Design Control in The United States--A review of Recent Research.Urban Design Quarterly,1992(September),5-10.
26. Shirvani, H.(1981).Urban Design Review-A Guide for Planners.American Planning Association.
27. Stoker, G.(1998).Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.International Social Science Journal,50(155),17-28.
28. Van Zeij-Rozema, A.,Cörvers, R.,Kemp, R.,Martens, P.(2008).Governance for Sustainable Development: A Framework.Sustainable Development,16(6),410-421.
29. 王濟昌（譯）、安斯里（英譯）, Daughs,Croce, Benedetto(1981).美學論衡.逢甲大學都市計畫系.
30. 朱光潛, K. C.(2021).談美.台北=Taipei:五南圖書=Wu-Nan Book.
31. 江斌,de Rijke, Chris,柯博晟（譯）(2022)。結構美：一種基於結構的量化圖像美感的計算方法。複雜學，1(1)
32. 吳英明, Y. M.,張其祿, C. L.(2005).全球化下的公共管理.台北=Taipei:商鼎文化=Shang Ding.
33. 呂正華, C. H.,林全能,張基義,林鑫保,宋同正,蕭乃沂,曾柏文,張皓詠,蘇安婷(2021).設計驅動公部門創新 : 6 個台灣案例的機制研究.台北市=Taipei City:經濟部工業局=Industrial Development Bureau, Ministry of Economic Affairs.
34. 李得全, T. C.(2014)。台北=New Taipei City，國立台北大學都市計劃研究所=Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taipei University。
35. 姚瑞中(2021)。找尋底層庶民美學來談台灣的現代性。VERSE，009，14-20。
36. 馬武定, W. D.(2005).城市美學.Beijing:中國建築工業出版社=China Architecture Publishing& Media.
37. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2018).教育部美感教育中長程計畫--第二期五年計畫（108-112 年）.台北=Taipei:教育部=Ministry of Education.
38. 黑川雅之, M.,李柏黎（譯）, P. L.(Trans.)(2019).八個日本的美學意識.台北=Taipei:雄獅圖書=Hsiung Shih Art Books.
39. 楊裕富, Y. F.(2011).敘事設計美學：四大文明風華再現.新北市=Taipei City:全華圖書=Chuan Hwa Book.
40. 臺北市政府文化局, Taipei City Government(2013).設計臺北‧不斷提升的城市.台北市=Taipei City:北市文化局=Department of Culture Affairs, Taipei City Government.
41. 劉亞蘭, Y. L.(2020).硬美學：從柏拉圖到古德曼的七種不流行讀法.台北=Taipei:三民書局=Sanmin.
42. 謝偉勳, W. H.(1991)。科學美學與哲學美學的辯證（上）--建築科學美學導論。建築師雜誌，198，36-41。
43. 謝偉勳, W. H.(1991)。科學美學與哲學美學的辯證（下）--建築科學美學導論。建築師雜誌，199，91-94。