分開儒家與伊斯蘭：西方普遍人權對亞洲價值的回應

Dividing Confucianism and Islam: The Western/Universal Human Rights Approach to Aisan Values

10.6164/JNDS.7-1.2

王玉青(Yu-Ching Wang)

多元文化 ； 伊斯蘭 ； 亞洲價值 ； 普遍人權 ； 認同 ； 論述策略 ； 儒家 ； multiculturalism ； Islam ； Asian Values ； Universal Human Rights ； identity ； narrative strategy ； Confucianism

國家發展研究

7卷1期（2007 / 12 / 01）

7 - 40

繁體中文

在亞洲價值當中，文化的多元性一直是東、西兩方學者都在探討的議題，東方學者想要藉著多元文化來強調本身文明的自主性，避免西方以「普遍人權」對非西方文明進行干涉；西方學者則藉由承認這些多元文化的同時出現來反襯自己的普遍價值，但是也要杜絕這些文化真的藉由「亞洲價值」而形成認同一致的整體，真正地威脅到西方的普遍身份。儒家和伊斯蘭文明在這樣的論述策略之下，習慣性地被西方作家寫成「同時出現，但分開討論」的不同文明。換言之，兩個文明雖然代表著一個「亞洲整體」來挑戰西方普遍身份，卻仍然被西方學者從各方面證明彼此之間的文化差異性。本文歸納西方論述策略中對於文明本質、文明的相互關係與文化調和的實際發展三個面向，得出可親的儒家和威脅的伊斯蘭兩種對西方有不同意義的所謂多元文化。

Multiculturalism has been the main issue for many western and eastern scholars when discussing Asian Values. In one respect, eastern writers focus on autonomy and self-identity of their own cultures by means of multiculturalism but attempt to avoid western intervention whose ultimate purpose covered with Universal Human Rights. In another, western writers reinforce universalism of west values by proving exist of Asian multiculturalism, while they have to preclude forming the identity of a ”Whole Asia” which is spirited by Asian Values and threaten western identity. Therefore, with this western context and narrative strategy established, Confucianism and Islam which could represent a ”Whole Asia” are usually divided into two kinds of different cultures. Cultural essentials, cultural interrelations, and reconciliation of cultures are three main points analyzed in this paper in which a friendly Confucianism and a threatening Islam could provide western world two contrasting images and conceptions.

1. 石之瑜、周嘉辰(2001)。超越普遍主義與相對主義人權觀有關辯論的省思。中國大陸研究，44(4)，1-14。
   連結：
2. Bell, Daniel A., (eds.)(2000).When the East meets the West.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
3. Bell, Lynda S.,Andrew J. Nathan,Ilan Peleg, (eds.)(2001).Negotiating Culture and Human Rights.New York:Columbia University Press.
4. Brems, Eva(2004).Reconciling Universality and Diversity in International Human Rights: A Theoretical and Methodological Framework and Its Application in the Context of Islam.Human Rights Review,5(3),5-21.
5. Carle, Robert(2005).Revealing and Concealing: Islamist Discourse on Human Rights.Human Rights Review,5(3),122-137.
6. Dallmayr, Fred(2002)."Asian Values" and Global Human Rights.Philosophy East & West,52(2),173-189.
7. Donnelly, Jack(2006).The Relative Universality of Human Rights.Human Rights Quarterly,33,1-35.
8. Freeman, Michael(2002).Human Rights: An interdisciplinary approach.UK:Polity Press.
9. Funabashi, Yoichi(1993).The Asianization of Asia.Foreign Affairs,72(5),75-85.
10. Jacobsen, Michael,Ole Bruun, (eds.)(2000).Human Rights and Asian Values: Contesting National Identities and Cultural Representations in Asia.Richmond, Surrey:Curzon Press.
11. Johnson, Barbara, (eds.)(1993).Freedom and Interpretation.New York:HarperCollins.
12. Magnarella, Paul J.(2004).Review Article: Communist Chinese and "Asian Values" Critiques of Universal Human Rights.Journal of Third World Studies,21(2),179-192.
13. Mayer, Ann E.(1995).Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and Politics.Boulder:Westview.
14. Ness, Peter Van, (eds.)(1999).Debating Human Rights.London:Routledge.
15. Ramadan, Tariq(2001).Islam, the West and the Challenges of Modernity.UK:The Islamic Foundation.
16. Rigg, Jonathan(2002).Of Miracle and Crises: (re-)interpretations of growth and decline in East and Southeast Asia.Asia Pacific Viewpoint,43(2),137-156.
17. Shute, Stephen,Susan Hurley, (eds.)(1993).On Human Rights.New York:BasicBooks.
18. Song, Young-Bae(2002).Crisis of Cultural Identity in East Asia: on the meaning of Confucian ethics in the age of globalization.Asian Philosophy,12(2),109-125.
19. 姜桂石、姚大學、王泰合著(2005)。全球化與亞洲現代化。北京:社會科學。
20. 夏光(2005)。東亞現代性與西方現代性－從文化的角度看。北京:新華書店。
21. 馬援譯、Mark Selden合著(2006)。Giovanni Arrighi, Takeshi Hamashita。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。

1. 蘇鈺楠(2013)。權利與義務，孰先孰後？─亞洲價值的論證對人權教育之啟示。教育實踐與研究，26(1)，95-118。
2. 張禎庭(2016)。「鏡花水月」─西方鏡像裡的中國花。博物館學季刊，30(2)，93-103。