题名

非營利組織辦理兩岸文教交流活動時的策略性順服行爲

并列篇名

The Research of NPOs' Strategic Compliance Behavior in Carrying Out Cross Strait's Culture and Educational Exchange: A Public Choice Approach

DOI

10.6164/JNDS.9-1.2

作者

吳宗憲(Chuang-Hsien Wu)

关键词

非營利組織 ; 政策順服 ; 公共選擇理論 ; 兩岸 ; 文教交流 ; NPO ; Policy Compliance ; Public Choice Approach ; Cross-Strait ; Culture and Educational Exchange

期刊名称

國家發展研究

卷期/出版年月

9卷1期(2009 / 12 / 01)

页次

37 - 83

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

開放兩岸文教交流以來,非營利組織在辦理交流活動時因某些因素對交流規範陽奉陰違,政府的行政措施效果因而打折扣。 本文經訪談彙整出非營利組織陽奉陰違的原因:文教與商業性質不易區分、雙方政府無法溝通、契約不確定性高、政府管制能力降低、以人際網絡獲得補助等等,並分別以公共選擇理論中外部性、公共財、代理人理論、交易成本理論、道德危機與逆向選擇等概念解釋,最後建議政府採取革新的管制方法以達「公私協力」的效益。

英文摘要

ROC government make cross-strait culture and educational exchange open in 1991. From then on, the exchange amount gets larger and larger. Though our NPOs play very important role for burgeon, they often comply in public but oppose in private, even offend against the law in public. The behavior makes restrictions in vain, even hurt country dignity or safe. By interview, we find this kind of behavior is due to characteristic belonging to cross-strait culture and educational exchange, including: mixing profit consideration in culture and educational exchange, lacking direct communization between ROC and PRC government, uncertainty contract, government's lower control ability, unfair grant system. Furthermore, we use some conceptions in public choice approach to explain why these factors affect NPOs' miscarriage behavior. These conceptions including externality, public good, agent theory, transaction cost theory, moral hazard and adverse selection.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 社會學
社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. Anderson, E.(1985).The Salesperson as Outside Agent of Employee: A Transaction Cost Analysis.Marketing Science,4,234-245.
  2. Anderson, J. E.(1979).Public Policy-Making.New York:Holt.
  3. Bickers, K. N.,Williams, J. T.(2001).Public Policy Analysis: A Political Economic Approach.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
  4. Buchanan, J. M.(Eds.),Tollison, R. D.(Eds.),Tullock, G(Eds.)(1980).Toward a Theory of Rent-Seeking Society.Texas A & M..
  5. Buckley, P.,Casson, M.,F. Contractor(eds.),P. Lorange(eds.)(1988).Cooperative Strategies in International Business: Joint Ventures and Technology Transfers Between Firms.New York:Lexington Books.
  6. Cyret, R. M.,March, J. G.(1963).A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
  7. Demsetz, H.(1967).Toward A Theory of Property Right.American Economic Review,57,347-359.
  8. Dunleavy, P.,O''Leary, B.(1987).Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy.UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1985).Control: Organization and Economic Approaches.Management Science,31,134-149.
  10. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1988).Agency and Institutional Explanations of Compensation in Retail Sales.Academy of Management Journal,31,488-511.
  11. Etzioni, A.(1975).A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations.New York:Free.
  12. Fama, E. F.(1980).Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.Journal of Political Economics,88,288-307.
  13. Fama, E. F.,Jensen, M. C.(1983).Separation of Ownership and Control.Journal of Law and Economics,26,301-326.
  14. Ferris. J,Tang, S.(1993).The New Institutionalism and Public Administration: An Overview.Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory,3(1),4-10.
  15. Jensen, M, C.,Meckling, W. H.(1976).Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics,3,305-360.
  16. Katz, M.,R. Willig(ed.)(1985).Handbook of Industrial Organization.New York:North Holland.
  17. Kelman, H. C.(1958).Compliance ,Identification and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change.Journal of Conflict Resolution, March.
  18. March, J. G.,Cohen, M. D.,Plsen, J. P.(1972).A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.Administrative Science Quarterly,17,1-25.
  19. Milward, H. B.(1983).Implementing Affirmative Action and Organizational Compliance: The Case of Universities.Administration and Society,15(3),363-384.
  20. Mueller, D. C.(1989).Public Choice II.Cambridge:Cambridge University.
  21. Neumann J. V.,O. Morgenstern(1944).Theory of Games and Economic Behavior.Princeton University.
  22. Olson, M. J.(1982).The Rice and Decline of Nations.New Haven, Conn:Yale University.
  23. Olson, M. J.(1965).The Logic of Collective Action.Cambridge:Harvard University.
  24. Rodgers, H. R.,Jr. Bullock,Charles S.(1976).Coercion to Compliance.Lexington Books:
  25. Simon, H. A.(1947).Administrative Behavior.New York:Macmillan.
  26. Williamson, O. E.(1996).The Mechanisms of Governance.New York:Oxford University.
  27. Williamson, O. E.(1975).Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.New York:Free.
  28. Williamson, O. E.(1985).The Economics of Institutions of Capitalism.New York:Free.
  29. 方福前(2000)。公共選擇理論:政治的經濟學。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
  30. 王信賢(2006)。我國民間團體於兩岸文教交流之角色與功能。行政院大陸委員會委託專案研究
  31. 朱志宏(2000)。公共政策。台北:三民書局。
  32. 江明修(2002)。非營利管理。台北:智勝出版。
  33. 吳定(2001)。公共政策辭典。台北:五南圖書公司。
  34. 吳瓊恩(2002)。公共行政學發展趨勢的探究:三種治理模式的互補基礎及其政治理論的基礎。公共行政學報,7,173-220。
  35. 吳瓊恩(1997)。行政學。台北:三民書局。
  36. 紀惠容、鄭怡世(2001)。非營利組織現行法令之探討與建議-非營利組織主管機關應扮演的角色。台灣非營利組織法律環境修訂研討會,台北:
  37. 徐仁輝(1999)。公共選擇觀點下的民主行政。行政管理論文選輯,14,27-42。
  38. 張世賢、陳恆鈞(1997)。公共政策-政府與市場的觀點。台北:商鼎文化出版社。
  39. 張維迎(2000)。賽局理論與信息經濟學。台北:茂昌圖書有限公司。
  40. 陳愷(1990)。台北,國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
  41. 詹益順(1982)。台北,中興大學公共政策暨政策研究所。
  42. 蔡玫芬(1997)。公共選擇途徑對官僚的行為模式分析介紹。公共行政學報,1,239-256。
  43. 謝辛美(1988)。台北,中興大學公共政策暨政策研究所。
  44. 蘇永明(1989)。高雄,高雄師範學院教育研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 黃婉玲、王怡瀠(2017)。研發成果商業化政策研究:順服因素之個案分析。公共行政學報,53,79-119。