電磁波風險爭議分析與風險治理之省思

The Analysis of EMF Risk Controversies and Reflection on Risk Governance

10.6164/JNDS.13-1.2

高淑芬(Shu-Fen Kao)；邱紹華(Shao-Hua Qiu)

風險治理 ； 電磁波 ； 風險爭議 ； 預防原則 ； 不確定性 ； risk governance ； EMF ； risk controversy ； the precautionary principle ； uncertainty

國家發展研究

13卷1期（2013 / 12 / 01）

41 - 92

繁體中文

不同來源電磁場（Electromagnetic Fields, EMF）健康風險，是近年來台灣社會高度關切且有爭議的新興科技發展議題之一，電磁波所引發的爭議突顯出傳統自然科學所能處理的風險爭議與評估的侷限。本文從實證案例觀察出發，解析台灣電磁輻射風險爭議的本質與現階段電磁波風險治理之困境，進而討論參與式風險治理典範發展的可能，盼望藉由這種新取向，我們得以提高台灣電磁波風險治理中科學嚴謹性與民主的合法性。

Health risks posed by Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) from various sources has been one of the most controversial topics involving emerging technologies in Taiwan. Controversies stemming from EMF exposure reveal the limitation of the traditional natural sciences in managing risk assessment. Utilizing a qualitative approach, including interview research and secondary data analysis, this article investigates the nature of the controversies surrounding EMF and the challenges currently facing EMF risk governance. The paper also discusses the possibility of employing participatory risk governance in Taiwan to manage EMF risk. The authors hope the new paradigm of risk governance will serve to enhance democratic legitimacy and scientific rigor.

1. 王瑞庚、周桂田(2012)。台灣發展 WiMAX 之潛在健康風險與風險治理探討。台灣公共衛生雜誌，31(5)，399-411。
   連結：
2. 周桂田(2007)。新興風險治理典範之芻議。政治與社會哲學評論，22，179-233。
   連結：
3. 周桂田(2000)。生物科技產業與社會風險─遲滯型高科技風險社會。台灣社會研究，39，239-283。
   連結：
4. 周桂田(2002)。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口─遲滯型高科技風險社會。台灣社會研究季刊，45，69-122。
   連結：
5. 周桂田(2004)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒的社會理性之對話─在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。台灣社會研究季刊，56，1-63。
   連結：
6. EUROPA (2002). “Science and Society Action Plan,” European Commission. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/science-society/pdf/ss_ap_en.pdf. Retrieved March 6, 2007.
7. World Health Organization (2007b). Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health: Exposure to Extremely Low Frequency Fields. Fact Sheet No. 322. Geneva: World Health Organization.
8. 劉莉秋（2005）。〈WiMAX基地台有容身之處嗎〉？http://www.ttida.org.tw/forum_detial.php?b_id=39。2012/04/28檢索
9. Henshaw, D. L. and O’Carroll, M. J. (2006). Response to Draft Opinion of SCENIHR on EMF. University of Bristol..
10. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2012). IARC Classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Available at: http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf. Accessed on April 28, 2012.
11. UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development) (1992). Agenda 21, English-language version formerly available at: http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/index.htm. Accessed on Auguest 20, 2008.
12. European Commission (2009). Report of the workshop on EMF and Health: Science and Policy to address public concerns. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/ health/risk_assessment/events/ev_20090211_en.htm. Accessed on October 20, 2012.
13. European Union (2001). “European Governance: A White Paper [Brussels, 25.7.2001 COM (2001) 428 final],” Commission of the European Communities. Available at: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf. Accessed on October 20, 2012.
14. (2007).Bioinitiative ReportBioinitiative Report,未出版
15. California EMF Program (2002). Policy options in the face of possible risk from power frequency electronic and magnetic fields (EMF). Available at: http://www.ehib.org/emf/RiskEvaluation/PolicyOptionsF.pdf. Accessed on October 28, 2013.
16. Balzano, Q.,Sheppard, A. R.(2002).The influence of the precautionary principle on science-based decision-making: questionable applications to risks of radiofrequency fields.Journal of Risk Research,5(4),351-369.
17. Beck, U.(1992).Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.New Delhi:Sage.
18. Blank, M.(2007).Bioinitiative Report: a Rational for a Biologically Based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)Bioinitiative Report: a Rational for a Biologically Based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF),未出版
19. Brown, P.(1992).Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing.Journal of Health and Social Behavior,33,267-281.
20. Charnley, G.,Elliott, D. E.(2002).Risk versus precaution: environmental law and public health protection.Environmental Law Reporter,32(2),363-366.
21. Conrad, J.(1980).Society, Technology and Risk Assessment.New York:Academic Press.
22. Conseil, d''Etat.(2005).Etudes & Documents n.56Etudes & Documents n.56,未出版
23. DeSario, J.(ed.),Langton, S.(ed.)(1987).Citizen participation in public decision making.Westport, CT:Greenwood.
24. Deville, A.,Harding, R.(1997).Applying the Precautionary Principle.Federation Press.
25. Evans, P. B.(1995).Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation.New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
26. Fischer, F.(2006).Participatory governance as deliberative empowerment: the cultural politics of discursive space.The American Review of Public Administration,36,19-40.
27. Fisher, E.(ed.),Jones, J.(ed.),Schomberg, R.(ed.)(2006).Implementing the Precautionary Principle.Cheltenham:Edwayd Elgar.
28. Funtowicz, S. O.,Ravetz, J. R.(1993).Science for the post-normal age.Futures,25(7),739-755.
29. Gee, D.(2009).Late lessons from early warnings: Towards realism and precautions with EMF?.Pathophysiology,16(2-3),217-231.
30. Gerold, R.,Liberatore, A.(2001).,European Commission.
31. Heath, R. L.(ed.),O''Hair, H. D.(ed.)(2010).Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication.New York:Routledge.
32. Hester, R. E.(ed.),Harrison, R. M.(ed.)(1998).Risk Assessment and Risk Management.Cambridge:Royal Society of Chemistry.
33. Hoppe, R.(1999).Policy Analysis, Science and Politics: From 'Speaking Truth to Power' to 'Making Sense Together'.Science and Public Policy,26(3),201-210.
34. Horlick-Jones, T.,Rowe, G.,Walls, J.(2007).Citizen engagement processes as information systems: the role of knowledge and the concept of translation quality.Public Understanding of Science,16,259-278.
35. Hsu, K. L.(2002).Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.
36. ICNIRP=International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection(2010).ICNIRP Guidelines "guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (1Hz to 100kHz).Health Physics,99(6),818-836.
37. ICNIRP=International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection(1998).ICNIRP Guidelines "guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz).Health Physics,74(4),494-522.
38. Jaeger, C.,Renn, O.,Rosa, E.,Webler, T.(2001).Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action.London:Earthscan.
39. Jasanoff, S.(1990).The Fifth Branch: Science Adviser as Policymakers.MA:Harvard University Press.
40. Kao, S. F.(2002).Michigan, U.S.A.,Michigan State University.
41. Kao, S. F.(2008).Social amplification of risk and environmental collective activism: a case study of Cobalt-60 contamination incident in Taiwan.International Journal of Global Environmental Issues,8,182-203.
42. Kao, S. F.(2012).EMF controversy in Chigu, Taiwan: contested declarations of risk and scientific knowledge have implications for risk governance.Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics,12,81-97.
43. Majone, G.(2002).What price safety? The precautionary principle and its policy implications.Journal of Common Market Studies,40(1),89-109.
44. Marchi, B.,Ravetz, J.(1999).Risk management and governance: a post-normal science approach.Futures,31,743-757.
45. McDaniels, T. L.(ed.),Small, M. J.(ed.)(2004).Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field.California:Cambridge University Press.
46. O''Riordan, T.,Cameron, J.,Jordan, A.(2001).Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle.London:Cameron May.
47. Ravetz, J.(1999).What is post normal science?.Futures,31(7),647-653.
48. Renn, O.(2005).Risk perception and communication: lessons for the food and food packaging industry.Food Additives and Contaminants,22(10),1061-1071.
49. Renn, O.(ed.),Webler, T.(ed.),Wiedemann, P.(ed.)(1995).Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
50. Renn, O.,Graham, P.(2005).Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach.Geneva:IRGC=International Risk Governance Council.
51. Renn, O.,Schweizer, P. J.(2009).Inclusive risk governance: concepts and application to environmental policy making.Environmental Policy and Governance,19,174-185.
52. Rosch, P. J.(ed.),Markov, M. S.(ed.)(2004).Bioelectromagnetic Medicine.New York:Marcel Dekker.
53. Skillington, T.(1997).Politics and the struggle to define: a discourse analysis of the framing strategies of competing actors in a new participatory forum.The British Journal of Sociology,48(3),493-513.
54. Stern, P.C.,Fineberg, H.(1996).Understanding Risk: Informing Decision in a Democratic Society.Washington, D.C.:National Academy Press.
55. Susskind, L.,Mackearnan, S.,Thomas-Larmer, J.(1995).The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reach Agreement.Thousand Oaks, California:Sage.
56. Tuler, S.,Webler, T.(1999).Voices from the forest: what participants expect of a public participation process.Society and Natural Resources,12(5),437-453.
57. Tuler, S.,Webler, T.(1995).Process evaluation for discursive decision making in environmental and risk policy.Human Ecological Review,2,62-74.
58. Webler, T.(1999).The craft and theory of public participation: a dialectical process.The Journal of Risk Research,2,55-71.
59. Webler, T.,Tuler, S.,Krueger, R.(2001).What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public.Environmental Management,27,435-450.
60. World Health Organization(2007).Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Fields.Geneva:World Health Organization.
61. 王毓正(2010)。論基本權之保護義務在不確定科技健康風險預防上之適用─以奈米科技與非游離 射應用之相關健康風險預防為例。興大法學，7，146-208。
62. 王榮德(2009)。從發現職業病因到發展生活品質與健康計量方法。台大校友雙月刊，65，32-39。
63. 李中一(2010)。行政院衛生署國民健康局委託研究計畫行政院衛生署國民健康局委託研究計畫,台北:行政院衛生署國民健康局。
64. 李中一(2004)。國科會專題研究計畫國科會專題研究計畫,台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
65. 李中一(2009)。行政院衛生署國民健康局委託研究計畫行政院衛生署國民健康局委託研究計畫,台北:行政院衛生署國民健康局。
66. 李中一(2009)。台北市政府衛生局委託研究計畫台北市政府衛生局委託研究計畫,台北:台北市政府衛生局。
67. 李中一、陳富莉(2004)。行政院環保署科技計畫行政院環保署科技計畫,台北:行政院環境保護署。
68. 林基興(2008)。電磁恐慌。台北:臺大出版中心。
69. 林銳敏(1994)。有害空氣污染物與健康風險評估。環境工程會刊，3(8)，121-126。
70. 金忠孝(2000)。致命的心引力：電磁波。台北:育民出版社。
71. 陳椒華(2008)。漫長苦行─對抗電磁輻射公害之路。台北:台灣電磁輻射公害防治協會。
72. 葉政秀譯、小山壽(2000)。恐怖的電磁。台北:世茂出版社。
73. 劉華美、周桂田(2006)。邁向一個開放性風險評估的可能─以生物多樣性議題之基因工程為檢討。台灣科技法律與政策論叢，2(4)，73-104。
74. 鄧文炳、丁幹(1997)。低劑量輻射效應的風險評估。核研季刊，22(1)，52-58。
75. 簡慧貞(2007)。環保署定期調查報告環保署定期調查報告,未出版

1. 陳潁峰(2018)。公民參與和核安治理─ 核四安全監督委員會與新北市核能安全監督委員會之比較。東吳政治學報，36(1)，1-63。
2. 林木興,周桂田(2020)。以化學物質風險治理作為權限：歐盟與臺灣管制機關之比較。中正大學法學集刊，67，97-166。