國外離岸風場引入保險之關鍵議題

Key Issues of Offshore Windfarms from an Insurance Perspective

10.6164/JNDS.201906_18(2).0004

龔景漢(Ching-Han Kung)

離岸風力發電 ； 海事檢驗師 ； 風險管理 ； 海上風電工程作業守則 ； Offshore Wind Power ； Marine Warranty Surveyor (MWS) ； Risk Management ； Offshore Code of Practice (OCoP) ； Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd

國家發展研究

18卷2期（2019 / 06 / 01）

153 - 187

繁體中文

自1970年代能源危機觸動替代性能源的需求法國巴黎協議簽訂以來，風力發電在技術大幅提升於綠色能源中異軍突起，這對於自然能源匱乏，但擁有優良風場的台灣而言，發展海上發電不啻是發展綠色能源中的優良選擇。本文探討現今離岸風力發電的發展趨勢與所面臨的挑戰，主要由一、離岸風場在各階段所面臨的風險，其中包含前期的選址、中期的工程階段到後期營運階段的風險。二、由市場技術與趨勢所產生的相應風險。三、借鏡歐洲過去的成功與失敗經驗紀錄可作為台灣發展離岸風力發電的重要參考。應對上述風險援用國外的『海上風電工程作業守則』（OCoP）作為離岸風電工程風險管理指南，並搭配獨立的海事檢驗師（MWS）為協力廠商單位去確認各步驟的落實與過程安全。但在因應台灣特有的海域特性及天然災害，如海底下沙土層液化、颱風、地震、雷擊、洋流等，具有在地風險特色考量的設計、施工、規劃、風險管理與第三方驗證才能確保離岸風力發電順遂推行。

Since the energy crisis touched the demand for alternative energy in the 1970s, and the signing of the Paris Agreement in France, wind power has sharp growth in green energy. For Taiwan, where natural resource is limited and homeland is small. Developing offshore wind power is one of the good choice for developing green energy especially Taiwan Strait with the excellent wind field. This paper has reported the challenges of offshore wind farm and the uncertainty of current development trend. It highlight the risk exposure during different stage from initial feasibility study, site selection, erection, operation to decommission. Past loss experience shows the type of loss and the severity of a potential loss case. Offshore Code of Practice (OCoP) and independent marine inspector (MWS) are used in Europe offshore wind farm to carry out the risk management. This risk management method can be a good reference for Taiwan. In addition, regards to Taiwan's unique sea characteristics and natural disasters, a specific design, construction, planning, risk management and third-party verification to compliant with Taiwan's special condition can ensure offshore wind farm to be implemented smoothly as well as operated successfully.

1. Caithness Windfarm Information Forum (2018). “Summary of Wind Turbine Accident data to 31 March 2018.” www.caithnesswindfarms.co.uk
2. DNV. GL(2015).,未出版
3. Funke, Silke (2017). “MHI Vestas launched the world’s most powerful wind turbine.” www.offshorewindindustry.com/news/mhi-vestas-launched-worlds-powerful-wind. Retrieval Date: 2018/1/24.
4. Garlick, Richard,Aukland, Richard(2016).,4C Offshore Limited.
5. Garlick, Richard,Powles, Simon(2018).,4C Offshore Limited.
6. Hertenberger, K. C.,Gerling, H.,de Argüelles, J.,Ellinghaus, R.,Ho, K. H.,Howe, S. T.,Johst, M.,Kjer, T.,Kragelund, N.,McBride, M.,Mengotti, A.,Scholz, F.,Schreiber, K.(2009).New Challenges for Wind Energy.IMIA WGP,62(09)
7. Land, T.,Schindler, A.,Thyrolf, F.(2014).International guideline on the risk management of offshore wind farms, Offshore Code of Practice.German Insurance Association.
8. Langston, S.,Aukland, R.,Zhang, R.(2018).,4C Offshore Limited.
9. Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd(2005).Risk Management for Public Works, Risk Management User Manual.The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Environment Transport and Works Bureau.
10. Randall-Smith, Bridget (2018). “Offshore Update 11th July 2018.”https://www.4coffshore.com/subscribers/downloads/public/4COffshore_OffshoreUpdate_20180711.pdf. Retrieval Date: 2018/6/11.
11. WWEA (2018). “Wind Power Capacity reaches 546 GW, 60 GW added in 2017.” https://wwindea.org/blog/2018/02/12/2017-statistics/. Retrieval Date: 2018/2/12.
12. 中國電力企業聯合會。〈海上風力發電工程施工規範（GB/T 50571-2010, 2010）〉
13. 中華民國經濟部標準檢驗局(2008)。〈中華民國國家標準（CNS）15177「風力發電機組詞彙」〉。
14. 吳遠偉(2015)。颱風對沿海風電機組的危害及對策。風能，2，89-93。
15. 李智（譯）,林清霖（譯）,龔景漢（譯）,張爽（譯）,陳洪元（譯）,Land, Thorsten,Schindler, Andreas,Thyrolf, Frank(2015).國際海上風電工程風險管理指南海上風電工程作業守則.瑞士再保險股份有限公司北京分公司再保工程險部.
16. 林俶寬,張上君,黃振愷,劉晉堯(2014)。台灣地區離岸風場選址技術之探討。中華技術，103，62-71。
17. 香港天文臺(2013)。香港天文臺(2013)。〈天氣稿第265號─熱帶氣旋情況下木港風速資料〉。
18. 蘇煒年,鄭景木,黃金城,陳中舜(2013)。,台北:核能研究所─風機技術分組。

1. 陳品璇,林建智,王正偉(2020)。離岸風力發電保單條款之疑義解析。保險專刊，36(2)，95-120。