檢視2010年代的跨大西洋關係：安全與經濟關係發展

The Transatlantic Relations in the 2010s: The Security and Economic Developments

10.6164/JNDS.202012_20(1).0001

賴昀辰(Yun-Chen Lai)

跨大西洋關係 ； 北大西洋公約組織 ； 跨大西洋貿易與投資夥伴協定 ； （反）全球化 ； 英國脫歐 ； Atlantic Relation ； NATO ； TTIP ； (anti-)Globalism ； Brexit

國家發展研究

20卷1期（2020 / 12 / 01）

1 - 42

繁體中文

二次大戰以來美歐同盟主導著國際政治舞台。2010年代大西洋兩岸政治發展的許多現象，包括英國脫歐、美國自2016年起由政治素人川普掌政、民粹在2016至2018年間的許多歐洲大選包括德奧義法大有斬獲等，影響了當地國內政治的同時也改變了國家對外政策，進而衝擊了跨大西洋關係。本文觀察2010年代，主要為英國脫歐公投及川普掌政後，大西洋兩岸在安全合作及經濟合作上的發展，包括大西洋兩岸透過北約的合作及歐盟與北約的競合，以及美歐近期在TTIP談判上的挫折，發現美歐關係在安全上的調整比經濟上的調整來得更為迅速順利。造成美歐關係在安全與經濟發展不同速的主要原因有二，其一為反全球化引起的泛政治化效應對於國際經濟合作的質疑，其二為美歐關係在政治與經濟上的關係本質差異－政治面為依賴關係，而經濟關係則是既合作又競爭。未來美歐關係的挑戰一則是如何回應反全球化浪潮對於國際合作的質疑，一為如何在英國脫歐後調整美歐英三角，重新鞏固大西洋關係。

US-Europe alliance has influenced the international relations since the second world war. Recent national elections in the US and in Europe, including those in Germany, Austria, Italy and France etc., reflected the rising of populism and questioned the globalization and current political regimes. The national elections above would not only decide the domestic politics but also influence foreign policies and US-Europe alliance. This research discusses the security and economic developments in the transatlantic relations, including the cooperation in the NATO and the competition between the EU and the NATO, and the frustration in the TTIP negotiation in recent years, finding that the adjustment in the security perspective is much quick than that in the economic one. The variation is due to the politicization in international economic cooperation issue causing by anti-globalization and the different natures of economy and politics of transnational relations. The nature of political relations is dependency, while that of economic relations is competition and cooperation. The future challenges of transatlantic relations are, how to respond to the question of anti-globalization, and how to adjust the US-EU-UK triangle after Brexit to rebuilt the transatlantic alliance.

1. 甘逸驊(2003)。北約東擴一軍事聯盟的變遷與政治意涵。問題與研究，42(4)，1-23。
   連結：
2. 李貴英(2017)。歐美跨大西洋貿易及投資夥伴協定之興起與挑戰。政治科學論叢，72，121-148。
   連結：
3. 賴昀辰(2016)。解析跨大西洋貿易與投資夥伴協議(TTIP) :理想與現實的可能矛盾。政治科學論叢，70，121-158。
   連結：
4. 賴昀辰(2020)。歐洲議題政治化現象之分析。臺灣民主季刊，16(4)，39-92。
   連結：
5. Akhtar, Shayerah Ilias(2017).U.S.-UK Free Trade Agreement: Prospects and Issues for Congress.Congressional Research Service,24
6. Archick, Kristin(2016).The European Union: Current Challenges and Future Prospects.Congressional Research Service,21
7. Baldwin, Richard(2016).Brexit Beckons: Thinking Ahead by Leading Economists.Cambridge:CEFR Press.
8. BBC News I中文(2016)。(歐盟與美國自由貿易協議談判「已經失敗」)。https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/world/2016/08/160828_german us。2020/06/25檢索。
9. Bendini, Roberto,De Micco, Pasquale(2014).,Directorate-General For External Policies Policy Department, European Parliament.
10. Biscop, S.(2016).All or Nothing? The EU Global Strategy and Defence Policy after the Brexit.Contemporary Security Policy,37(3),431-445.
11. Bizzarri, K.(2013).,Seattle to Brussels.
12. Blockmans, S.(2016).Brexit, Globalisation and the Future of the EU.Intereconomics,51(4),182-183.
13. Bond, Ian (2016). “NATO, the EU and Brexit: Joining Forces?” Centre for European Reform. https://www.cer.eu/insights/nato-eu-andbrexit-joining-forces. Retrieval Date: 2018/07/13.
14. Brânda, Oana-Elena(2017).NATO-EU Relations in the Aftermath of Brexit.International Scientific Conference Strategies XXI,Taoyuan:
15. Bremmer, Ian (2016). “The Hallow Alliance.” Time. http://time.com/ 4371195/nato-transatlantic-alliance-us-europe/. Retrieval Date: 2018/07/16.
16. Bugajski, J.(2016).Only NATO Can Defend Europe.European View,15,27-35.
17. Capaldo, J.(2014).The Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: European Disintegration, Unemployment and Instability.Global Development and Environment Institute Working Paper,14(3)
18. Crouch, C.(2014).Democracy at a TTIP’ing Point: Seizing a Slim Chance to Reassert Democratic Sovereignty in Europe.Juncture,21(3),176-181.
19. Daalder, Ivo H. (2000). “Europe: Rebalancing the US-European Relationship.” https://www.brookings.edu/articles/europe-rebala ncing-the-u-s-european-relationship/. Retrieval Date: 2020/06/30.
20. De Luce, Dan,McLeary, Paul(2016).Brexit Is Good News for Russia, but a Headache for NATO.Foreign Policy,26
21. De Wilde, P.(2011).No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration.Journal of European Integration,33(5),559-575.
22. Defraigne, P.(2014).Departing from TTIP and Going Plurilateral.Madariaga Paper,7(9)
23. Dennison, James, and Oliver, Tim (2018). “Brexit and NATO: Never the Twain Shall Meet? The Dahrendorf Forum.” Dahrendorf Form: Debating Europe. http://www.dahrendorf-forum.eu/brexit-nato-eu-defence/. Retrieval Date: 2018/07/13.
24. Dimitrova, Anna(2016).Troubled Times for Transatlantic Relations.Europe in Trouble
25. Dunn, David Hastings,Webber, Mark(2016).The UK, the European Union and NATO: Brexit’s Unintended Consequences.Global Affairs,2(5),471-480.
26. European Union(2016).Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe: A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy.
27. Freedman, L.(2016).Brexit and the Law of Unintended Consequences.Survival,58(3),7-12.
28. Gabriel, Felbermayr,Mario, Larch,Lisandra, Flach,Erdal, Yalcin,Sebastian, Benz(2013).Dimensions and Effects of a Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement between the EU and US..Munich Beringer:Ifo Institute.
29. Grande, E.,Hutter, S.(2016).Beyond authority transfer: explaining the politicisation of Europe.West European Politics,39(1),23-43.
30. Hamilton, DS(ed.)(2014).The Geopolitics of TTIP: Repositioning the Transatlantic Relationship for a Changing World.Washington, DC:Center for Transatlantic Relations.
31. Hooghe, L.,Marks, G.(2009).A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining.British journal of political science,1-23.
32. House of Lords(2014).The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.
33. Joseph, Francois,Miriam, Manchin,Hanna, Norberg,Olga, Pindyuk,Patrick, Tomberger.(2013).,Centre for Economic Policy Research.
34. Keohane, Daniel (2018). “EU-NATO Alignment After Brexit - Carnegie Europe - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.” http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/75861. Retrieval Date: 2018/ 07/13.
35. Kienzle, Benjamin, and von Weitershausen, Inez (2017). “Brexit Has Given an Impetus to Reshape Europe’s Foreign, Security and Defence Policies.” LSE Brexit. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2017/ 05/02/brexit-has-given-an-impetus-to-reshape-europes-foreign-security-and-defence-policies/. Retrieval Date: 2018/07/15.
36. Koenig, Nicole (2017). “What the French and the Germans Really Think About a European Security and Defense Union.” Jacques Delors Institute Berlin.
37. Larik, J.(2018).The New Transatlantic Trigonometry: ‘Brexit’ and Europe’s Treaty Relations with the United States.University of Pennsylvania Journal of International law
38. LaRocco, Lori Ann (2017). “Wilbur Ross Says He’s ‘Open to Resuming’ Talks on Mega-Trade Deal with Europe”. CNBC https:// www.cnbc.com/2017/05/30/exclusive-wilbur-ross-says-hes-open-to-resuming-ttip-negotiations.html. Retrieval Date: 2017/06/22.
39. Lawder, David (2016). “The US-UK ‘special Relationship’ Is Too Important to Be Impacted by Brexit - Business Insider.” http:// www.businessinsider.com/r-us-uk-alliance-seen-outweighing-brexit-trade-concerns-2016-6. Retrieval Date: 2018/07/13.
40. Lightfoot, Jeffrey, and Oliver, Tim (2016). “A UK-EU Divorce: Bad News for America,” The National Interest. http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/uk-eu-divorce-bad-news-america-9487. Retrieval Date: 2016/12/25.
41. Lightfoot, Jeffrey, and Oliver, Tim (2013). “Britain Outside Europe? The US View.” Atlantic Council.
42. Mix, Derek E.(2015).Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of CongressCongressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress,未出版
43. Munich Security Conference, Post-West(2017).Munich Security ReportMunich Security Report,未出版
44. Oliver, T.(2016).A European Union without the United Kingdom.Strategic Update,6(1)
45. Oliver, Tim,Williams, Michael John(2016).Special Relationships in Flux: Brexit and the Future of the US - EU and US - UK Relationships.International Affairs,92(3),547-567.
46. Pabst, A.(2016).Brexit, Post-Liberalism, and the Politics of Paradox.Telos,176,189-201.
47. Raza, Werner,Grumiller, Jan,Von Arnim, Rudi(2014).,Austrian Foundation for Development Research.
48. Rodrik, D.(2017).Too late to compensate free trade’s losers.Project Syndicate,11
49. Sanchez, Raf(2016).Britain Leads Push to Convince Washington to Back Transatlantic Free Trade Deal.The Telegraph
50. Stalenheim, Petter,Perdomo, Catalina(2007).Military Expenditure, Sipri Yearbook 2007: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
51. Stiglitz, Joseph (2014). “On the Wrong Side of Globalization.” The New York Times http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/ 15/on-the-wrong-side-of-globalization/. Retrieval Date: 2014/ 03/15.
52. Stokes, Doug,Whitman, Richard G.(2013).Transatlantic Triagle? European and UK ‘Grand Strategy’ after the US Rebalance to Asia.International Affairs,89(5),1087-1107.
53. Valasek, T.(2007).The Roadmap to Better EU-NATO Relations.London:Centre for European Reform.
54. Venhaus, Marc(2015).Progressive EconomyProgressive Economy,未出版
55. Vukadinović, Lidija Čehulić,Begović, Monika,Jušić, Luka(2017).NATO in Europe: Between Weak European Allies and Strong Influence of Russian Federation.Croatian International Relations Review,23,5-32.
56. Williamson, J. G.(2005).Winners and losers over two centuries of globalization. In Wider perspectives on global development.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
57. Yost, David Scott(2014).NATO’s Balancing Act.Washington, DC:United States Institute of Peace Press.
58. 李貴英（編）,吳志成（編）(2020).英國脫歐與歐洲轉型.台北:臺大出版中心.
59. 周子欽(2020)。區域整合脈絡下的「一代一路」:地緣政治經濟觀點。全球政治評論，69，63-92。
60. 張鳴(2012).重說中國近代史.香港:香港中和出版有限公司.
61. 劉大年(2019)。美國川普政府的貿易政策。經濟前瞻，185，9-21。