權力的衝突或制衡？羅馬尼亞、斯洛維尼亞、保加利亞共治期間難民政策運作之研究

＂Checks and Balances＂ or Conflict? A Study on the Operation of Refugee Policy During the Cohabitation in Romania, Slovenia and Bulgaria

10.6164/JNDS.202012_20(1).0002

張峻豪(Chun-Hao Chang)；李宜展(Yi-Jhan Li)

難民政策 ； 半總統制 ； 共治 ； 權力制衡 ； 歐洲整合 ； Refugee Policy ； Semi-presidential System ； Cohabitation ； Checks and Balances ； European Integration

國家發展研究

20卷1期（2020 / 12 / 01）

43 - 78

繁體中文

近來民粹主義與右翼政黨興起，隨著難民危機爆發，為歐盟治理帶來嚴峻的挑戰。難民治理在歐盟超國家機制與會員國力量的互動下形塑出當今樣貌，然會員國在歐盟的意見，來自於其國家内部因素的影響，因此，在半總統制民主國家中，總統、總理與國會的互動方式也直接或間接影響難民議題在歐盟内的走向。過往文獻認為，共治期間總統與總理的衝突會為一國帶來不穩定的狀態。但經過對難民議題與共治内涵的深入追蹤與分析，本文認為這樣衝突的狀態代表半總統制下權力的制衡，然這個過程不僅能將民意反映至政府運作過程當中，也將共治下的政府權力運作帶回到民主憲政意義之上。因此若能將衝突正面看待，對於難民問題此一高度政治性與爭議性的領域則可帶來更多的討論空間。故本文指出，共治雖然使憲政運作不穩定，在此結構下各行為者權力的制衡帶來衝突，但也提供了解決問題的契機，亦即透過制衡關係來調適政策衝突，才能使一國民主健康發展。據此，本文自比較研究的視野出發，首先討論半總統制理論與難民政策研究，接著以實證資料分析與比較三個半總統制國家中總統與總理在共治期間對難民政策有何合作與衝突，最後則結合憲政研究與國際關係視野，提出結論。

For a long time, cohabitation, with its normative and practical aspects both emphasized, has been highly regarded in semi-presidential study due to its academic as well as political significance. Though cohabitation is not an obligatory political outcome in semi-presidential nations, in view of the cabinet system in semi-presidential constitutions and the three cohabitation examples in France, many researchers show high interest in the influence and the necessity of cohabitation. This paper assesses whether prime minister should cooperate with president in the period of cohabitation. We develop a refugee policy analysis to explain the dynamic of cohabitation in Slovenia, Romania and Bulgaria. These countries have serious refugee problems, moreover, the pressure between European Union and domestic politics also interrupt the relationship between president, prime minister and parliament. Through comparative research and data of public opinion survey, we analyze president and prime minister's reaction to refugees, and argues that conflicts do not necessarily lead to negative outcome. Cohabitation may a critical approach to deal with this kind of highly controversial problems.

1. 沈有忠(2011)。半總統制下行政體系二元化之內涵。政治科學論叢，47，33-64。
   連結：
2. 沈有忠(2013)。保加利亞「議會化半總統制憲法」的設計與運作。政治科學論叢，58，17-46。
   連結：
3. 沈有忠(2014)。原子化社會下的民主化與憲政運作:以羅馬尼亞半總統制為例。東吳政治學報，32(1)，1-52。
   連結：
4. 張峻豪(2015)。新興半總統制國家的共治運作機制與路徑多樣性。東吳政治學報，33(2)，121-185。
   連結：
5. 蔡榮祥(2013)。多黨總理總統制民主的政府類型與憲政運作的衝突─以斯洛維尼亞、斯洛伐克、克羅埃西亞、立陶宛為例。東吳政治學報，31(3)，65-116。
   連結：
6. 蔡榮祥,石鵬翔(2011)。總理總統制與政治穩定:以烏克蘭、羅馬尼亞為例。政治科學論叢，44，65-106。
   連結：
7. 鄭端耀(2005)。國際關係新古典現實主義理論。問題與研究，4411，115-140。
   連結：
8. Anghel, V and Aleksandrova, T. (2018). “Bulgaria – President Radev is shaping a political alternative.” Presidential power: http:// presidential-power.com/?cat=87. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/21.
9. Associated Press (2015). “The latest: Slovenia demands that EU solves migrant crisis.” San Diego Union Tribune: https://www.sandiego uniontribune.com/sdut-the-latest-fire-razes-swedish-house-intended-for-2015oct24-story.html.Retrieval Date: 2019/9/19.
10. Balkan Insider (2018). “Slovenian PM Miro Cerar escapes impeachment in case of Syrian refugee.” Balkan Insider: https://www.balkani nsider.com/slovenian-pm-miro-cerar-escapes-impeachment-in-case-of-syrian-refugee/. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/21.
11. Boffey, D (2017). “Slovenia PM facing impeachment over support for refugee.” The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/ 2017/nov/23/slovenia-pm-miro-cerar-facing-impeachment-over-support-for-refugee. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/21.
12. Bordignon, M.,Moriconi, S.(2017).The case for a common European refugee policy.Policy Contribution,8,1-13.
13. Bucureasa, C. (2016). “Romanians fear living near refugees, poll says.” Balkan Insight: https://balkaninsight.com/2016/04/20/romanians-fear-living-near-refugees-poll-says-04-19-2016/. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/19.
14. Cavatorta, F.,Elgie, R.(2010).The Impact of Semi-Presidentialism on Governance in the Palestinian Authority.Parliamentary Affairs,63(1),22-40.
15. Cheresheva, M. (2016). “Bulgarian Nationalists Accused of Stirring Anti-Refugee tension.” in Balkan Insight: https://balkaninsight.com/ 2016/09/19/nationalists-want-refugees-out-of-bulgarian-cities-09- 17-2016/. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/20.
16. Choudhry, S.,Sedeliu, T.,Kyrychenko, J.(2018).Semi presidentialism and Inclusive Governance in Ukraine: Reflections for Constitutional Reform.Stockholm:International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
17. Conti, N.,Mauro, D. D.,Memoli, V.(2019).Citizens, immigration and the EU as a shield.European Union Politics,20(3),492-510.
18. Danica, F. K.(2005).Slovenia.European Journal of Political Research,44,1179-1187.
19. Duverger, M.(1980).A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government.European Journal of Political Research,8(2),165-187.
20. DW (2019a). “Bulgaria makes biggest military acquisition since fall of communism.” DW: https://www.dw.com/en/bulgaria-makes-biggest-military-acquisition-since-fall-of-communism/a-49655416. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/21.
21. DW (2019b). “Bulgarian president vetoes fighter jet deal with the US.”DW: https://www.dw.com/en/bulgarian-president-vetoes-fighter-jet-deal-with-the-us/a-49721482. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/21.
22. Elgie, R.(2004).Semi-Presidentialism: Concepts, Consequences and Contesting Explanations.Political Studies Review,2,314-330.
23. Elgie, R.(2008).The Perils of Semi-Presidentialism. Are They Exaggerated?.Democratization,15(1),49-66.
24. Elgie, R.(2010).Semi-presidentialism, Cohabitation and the Collapse of Electoral Democracies, 1990-2008.Government and Opposition,45(1),29-49.
25. Elgie, R.(2008).Semi-Presidentialism: An Increasingly Common Constitutional Choice.Conference on Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy: Institutional Choice, Performance, and Evolution
26. Elgie, R.(ed.),Moestrup, S.(ed.)(2012).Semi-presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe.New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan.
27. Elgie, Robert(1999).Semi-Presidentialism in Europe.New York:Oxford University Press.
28. Feijó, R. G.(2014).O Semi-presidencialismo Timorense: história, politica e desenho institucional. Depoimentose análises.Coimbra:Almedina.
29. Genschel, P.,Jachtenfuchs, M.(2018).From Market Integration to Core State Powers: The Eurozone Crisis, the Refugee Crisis and Integration Theory.Journal of Common Market Studies,56(1),178-196.
30. Glorius, B.(2018).Public opinion on immigration and refugees and patterns of politicization Evidence from the Eurobarometer.Research on the Common European Asylum System,1-33.
31. Hansen, T. G.(2014).International Refugee Law and Refugee Policy: The Case of Deterrence Policies.Journal of Refugee Studies,27(4),574-595.
32. Harteveld, E.,Schaper J.,De Lange, S. L.,Van Der Brug, Wouter(2018).Blaming Brussels? The Impact of (News about) the Refugee Crisis on Attitudes towards the EU and National Politics.Journal of Common Market Studies,56(1),157-177.
33. Kim, Young Hun(2015).A Troubled Marriage? Divided Minority Government, Cohabitation, Presidential Powers, President Parliamentarism and Semi-Presidentialism.Government and Opposition,652-681.
34. Kirschke, L.(2007).Semipresidentialism and the Perils of Power Sharing in Neopatrimonial States.Comparative Political Studies,40(11),1372-1394.
35. Krasimirov, A. (2018). “Bulgaria parliament bars government from signing deals on migrant readmissions” in Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-bulgaria/bulgaria-ment-bars-government-from-signing-deals-on-migrant-readmissions-idUSKBN1KA1YU. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/20. parlia
36. Lavenex, S.(2002).EU enlargement and the challenge of policy transfer: the case of refugee policy.Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,28(4),701-721.
37. Lavenex, S.(2001).The Europeanization of Refugee Policies: Normative Challenges and Institutional Legacies.Journal of Common Market Studies,39(5),851-874.
38. Linz, J. J.,Stepan, A. C.(1996).Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
39. National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria. “Constitution.”National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria: https://www.parliament.bg/en/const. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/7.
40. Naumann, E.,Stoetzer, F, L.,Pietrantuono, G.(2018).Attitudes towards highly skilled and low-skilled immigration in Europe: A survey experiment in 15 European countries.European Journal of Political Research,57,1009-1030.
41. Niemann, A.,Zaun, N.(2018).EU Refugee Policies and Politics in Times of Crisis: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.Journal of Common Market Studies,56(1),3-22.
42. Nine O’ Clock (2015). “PM Ponta replies to President’s accusation about lack of mandate in Sofia: I meet PMs when I find appropriate, Iohannis goes to Brussels loke a deaf to dance.” Nine O’ Clock: https://www.nineoclock.ro/2015/10/26/pm-ponta-replies-to-presidents-accusations-about-lack-of-mandate-in-sofia-i-meet-pms-when-i-find-appropriate-iohannis-goes-to-brussels-like-a-deaf-to-dance/. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/19.
43. OECD(2019).How do Europeans differ in their attitudes to immigration? Findings from the European Social Survey 2002/03-2016/17.OECD Report,1-40.
44. Paun, C. (2018). “Romanian President calls on Prime Minister to resign.” Politico: https://www.politico.eu/article/klaus-iohannis-viorica-dancila-romania-president-calls-on-prime-minister-to-resign/. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/20.
45. Protsyk, O.(2006).Intra-Executive Competition between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of Institutional Conflict and Cooperation under Semi-Presidentialism.Political Studies,54(6),219-244.
46. Raunio, T.,Sedelius, T.(2019).Shifting Power-Centers of Semi Presidentialism: Exploring Executive Coordination in Lithuania.Government and Opposition,54(4),634-660.
47. Raunio, T.,Sedelius, T.(2019).Presidents and Cabinets: Coordinating Executive Leadership in Premier-Presidential Regimes.Political Studies Review,18(1),53-70.
48. Rusheva, V. (2018). “Bulgarian PM criticises EU’s migration approach.” New Europe: https://www.neweurope.eu/article/bulgarian-pm-criticizes-eus-migration-approach/. Retrieval Date: 2019/9/21.
49. Savage, L.(2018).How and when do presidents influence the duration of coalition bargaining in semi-presidential systems?.European Journal of Political Research,57,308-332.
50. Sedelius, T.,Linde, J.(2018).Unravelling semi-presidentialism: Democracy and government performance in four distinct regime types.DEMOCRATIZATIO,25(1),136-157.
51. Shugart, M.(2005).Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive And Mixed Authority Patterns.French Politics,3,323-351.
52. Shugart, M.,Carey, J.(1992).Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
53. Skach, C.(2007).The “newest” separation of powers: Semipresi dentialism.International Constitution,5(1),93-121.
54. 吳玉山(2011)。半總統制:全球發展與研究議程。政治科學論叢，47，1-32。
55. 沈玄池(2015)。近期歐洲難民問題之根源與發展。全球政治評論，52，1-10。
56. 沈有忠(2018).台灣與後共國家半總統制的憲政運作.台北:翰蘆圖書.
57. 卓忠宏(2016)。移民與安全:歐盟移民政策分析。全球政治評論，56，47-73。
58. 洪茂雄(1999)。後共產主義時期保加利亞的政經發展。美歐季刊，13(2)，181-204。
59. 徐正戎(2000)。『左右共治』─(雙首長制)之宿命。政策刊，59，8-12。
60. 張峻豪(2016).共治類型與新興半總統制國家的憲政經驗.台北:翰蘆圖書.
61. 張峻豪(2017)。政黨體系與新興半總統制國家的共治運作(1991-2017)。「中國政治學會年會暨學術研討會」論文，台北:
62. 盛盈仙(2015)。難民問題對歐洲整合的影響。全球政治評論，52，29-34。
63. 楊三億(2015)。近期難民潮對中東歐國家與歐盟整合之影響。全球政治評論，52，17-21。
64. 盧文豪(2016)。歐洲難民危機對歐盟之衝擊探討。戰略安全研析，135，47-57。

1. 張峻豪(2023)。總統非立法權與總理總統制國家的憲政運作：以法國、芬蘭、斯洛伐克、羅馬尼亞為例。行政暨政策學報，77，67-95。
2. (2023)。我國行政首長權責問題之探討。樹德科技大學學報，25(1)，45-63。