訓練成效的評鑑

Evaluate the Training Effectiveness

10.29999/QM.200610.0009

吳瓊治(C. C. Wu)

品質月刊

42卷10期（2006 / 10 / 01）

44 - 48

繁體中文

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the training effectiveness. In face the fast of development of the knowledge, Human Resources become the one of indices of the value of enterprises. If training can improve the ability of employees, the overall competitiveness of the enterprises will also be enhanced. Therefore, how to use some methods to evaluate the training effectiveness has become a very important action in enterprises. There are many evaluation models provided by scholars. We introduce Kirkpatrick model comprised of four training evaluation criteria (1) reaction, (2) learning, (3) behavior, (4) results Then we present four evaluation methods (1) posttest, (2) pretest/posttest, (3) pretest/posttest and control group, (4) Solomon Four Group, and obtain the results of training evaluation. Finally, we propose some conclusion to enterprises.

1. Alliger, George M.,Tannenbaum, Scott I.,Bennett, JR.,Traver, Holly,Shotland, Allison(1997).A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria.Personnel Psychology,50,341-358.
2. Cascio, Wayne F.(1991).Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations.Boston:PWS-KENT.
3. Edvinsson, L.,Malone, M. S.(1997).Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company`s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower.Collins.
4. Kirkpatrick, D. L.(1994).Evaluation Training Program: The four levels.San Francisco:Berrett-Koehler.
5. Randy L. DeSimone,David M. Harris(1998).Human Resource Development.The Dryden Press.
6. Warr, P.,Allan, C.,Birdi, K.(1999).Predicting three levels of training outcome.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,72,351-375.
7. 戴幼農(1994)。訓練評核的原則與方法。就業與訓練，12(4)，16-22。

1. 賈本英(2016)。「照顧服務員課程」訓練之訓練成效與就業力關係之探討-以高雄市為例。義守大學管理碩博士班學位論文。2016。1-94。