《春秋公羊傳注疏》合刻例考

A Study of the Combined Printings of the Gongyang Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Classic with Notes and Explanations

郜積意(GAO Jiyi)

《公羊》經傳 ； 注疏合刻 ； 十行本 ； 九行本 ； 殿本 ； the Spring and Autumn classic ； the Gongyang commentary ； combined editions with notes and explanations ； ten-line edition ； nine-line edition ； palace edition

中國文哲研究集刊

52期（2018 / 03 / 01）

119 - 167

繁體中文

《公羊》經傳注疏之合刻，今日所見，有宋十行本一系、明九行本一系、清武英殿本一系。十行本據余本與單疏本合刻，而余本則以經注本與《釋文》合并。九行本乃據十行本重刻，然於疏文之分附有所更改。殿本主據明北監本，但重新分附《釋文》、疏文，體例與十行本、九行本全異。案注疏合刻，當以何休注本為先，何氏合經傳為之注，釋傳為主，釋經為次，且釋經之注常置於釋傳之注下，故宜先明何氏注例，注疏合并方有理可據。殿本以釋經之注附於經下，不附於傳注下，破經注不分之理，是不依何休注本，故其分附之法最不可從。至於十行本、九行本，經注雖不分，然其分附疏文之例，前後相違者時見。知乎各本合并之例，則底本之選擇、校勘之去取即可心中了然，不為時俗所誤矣。

Combined printings of the Gongyang Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Classic with its annotations and supplemental notes exist in three versions: the Song edition, featuring ten lines per half-page, the Ming edition of nine lines per half-page, and the Qing Wuying Palace edition. The ten-line edition is a combination of the Yu Renzhong (fl. ca. 1180-1200) edition, which put the text and notes together with the ＂glosses on words＂ (shiwen) commentary, with a separately issued edition of the explanations. The nine-line edition is a reprint of the ten-line version, but with the placement of the explanations somewhat modified. The palace edition is based mainly on an edition produced at the Northern Directorate of Education in the Ming dynasty, but with its own arrangement of the ＂glosses＂ and explanations. Its arrangement is completely different from that of the ten- and nine-line editions. The common basis of all these combined editions is the commentary of He Xiu (129-182), which was made on the text of the Spring and Autumn classic together with the Gongyang commentary. The focus of He's commentary is on the Gongyang, not the Spring and Autumn text, and his comments on the classic frequently appear below those on the commentary. Thus, to clarify the combined editions it is first necessary to understand the structure of He Xiu's edition. In the palace edition, notes pertaining to the Spring and Autumn classic have been appended directly to the classic, instead of after the notes on the commentary. This is at odds with He Xiu's arrangement, so the arrangement of the palace edition is the least reliable among the combined editions. As to the ten- and nine-line versions, although they do not separate the classic and its annotations, the arrangement of the explanations frequently shows discrepancies. When we are clear about the differences between the three editions, we can know clearly how to choose the master text, and make lucid decisions on what to keep and reject when we edit, while avoiding being misled by the customs of our times.

1. (1995)。續修四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
2. (1983)。文淵閣《四庫全書》。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
3. (1995)。續修四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
4. (1977)。國立故宮博物院宋本圖錄。臺北:國立故宮博物院。
5. (1995)。續修四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
6. 中華書局編輯部編(2006)。宋元明清書目題跋叢刊。北京:中華書局。
7. 孔穎達(2003)。尚書正義。北京:北京圖書館出版社。
8. 孔穎達(2014)。禮記正義。北京:北京大學出版社。
9. 孔穎達(2003)。禮記正義。北京:北京圖書館出版社。
10. 孔穎達(2003)。春秋左傳正義。北京:北京圖書館出版社。
11. 王弼注、韓康伯注、孔穎達疏(2003)。周易注疏。北京:北京圖書館出版社。
12. 何休(1990)。春秋公羊經傳解詁。臺北:國立故宮博物院。
13. 何休(2003)。春秋公羊經傳解詁。北京:北京圖書館出版社。
14. 何休(2003)。春秋公羊經傳解詁。北京:北京圖書館出版社。
15. 何休注，徐彥疏：《春秋公羊傳註疏》，明萬曆中北京國子監刊本。
16. 何休注，徐彥疏：《春秋公羊傳注疏》，清乾隆四年武英殿刊刻，同治十年重刊本。
17. 何休注、徐彥疏(2005)。春秋公羊傳注疏。長春:吉林出版集團公司。
18. 何休注，徐彥疏：《春秋公羊傳註疏》，明嘉靖中李元陽刊本。
19. 何休注，徐彥疏：《春秋公羊傳註疏》，明崇禎中虞山毛氏汲古閣刊本。
20. 李霖(2016)。南宋浙刻義疏官版的貯存與遞修。《十三經注疏》與經學文獻研究」學術研討會，福州:
21. 阮元校刻(1989)。十三經注疏附挍勘記。臺北:藝文印書館。
22. 阮元校刻(1989)。十三經注疏附挍勘記。臺北:藝文印書館。
23. 阮元校刻(1989)。十三經注疏附挍勘記。臺北:藝文印書館。
24. 阮元校刻(1989)。十三經注疏附挍勘記。臺北:藝文印書館。
25. 阮元校刻(1989)。十三經注疏附挍勘記。臺北:藝文印書館。
26. 屈萬里(1970)。書傭論學集。臺北:臺灣開明書店。
27. 徐彥(2003)。春秋公羊疏。北京:北京圖書館出版社。
28. 徐彥：《公羊疏》（鈔本），日本名古屋蓬左文庫藏。
29. 班固(1962)。漢書。北京:中華書局。
30. 張壽林(2009)。張壽林著作集—續修四庫提要稿（一）經部。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。
31. 張麗娟(2013)。宋代經書注疏刊刻研究。北京:北京大學出版社。
32. 馮曉庭(2012)。蓬左文庫《春秋公羊疏》鈔本考釋。古文獻研究集刊，南京:
33. 賈公彥(2003)。周禮疏。北京:北京圖書館出版社。
34. 錢大昕、楊勇軍整理(2011)。十駕齋養新錄。上海:上海書店。
35. 魏徵、令狐德棻(1973)。隋書。北京:中華書局。

1. 許超傑(2022)。何休《春秋公羊解詁》注釋體式研究－以《總目》「何休《解詁》但釋傳而不釋經」切入點。中國文哲研究集刊，61，123-151。
2. (2023)。《尚書》合刻本中書序、篇目及對應疏文的編排形態考述。嶺南學報，20，181-213。