《穀梁傳》注疏合刻與單疏本相關問題考辨

A Comparative Study of the Commentaries on the Guliang zhuan

簡逸光(CHIEN I-kuang)

《穀梁傳》 ； 注疏本 ； 單疏本 ； Guliang zhuan ； annotation with commentary ； separate commentary

中國文哲研究集刊

58期（2021 / 03 / 01）

127 - 160

繁體中文

宋代將《穀梁傳》注疏合刻，以方便故，單疏本遂不流行。惟合刻時更改出文、變換體例，若非與單疏本核校，無從知之。注疏合刻改動或有其考量，單疏本亦有原意，且還原其本，善者從之，不善者勘正之。過去陳鱣、阮元云何煌校《穀梁》所據單疏本為明李中麓抄本，今之學者也認為李中麓抄本是今存三種《穀梁》單疏本的祖本。經核對發現，目前留存的《穀梁》單疏本可分為兩系，其一為清陳鱣抄本、瞿鏞恬裕齋抄本，其二為劉承幹據張金吾抄本刊刻之《嘉業堂叢書》《穀梁疏》。又阮元校勘記中引何煌校本者，疑何煌並據以上兩系之單疏本而來。

During the Song dynasty, two commentaries were published on the Guliang zhuan; one is the original commentary, and the other is the same commentary printed together with annotations. Due to the relative convenience of the latter, the former has fallen out of use. However, collating these two commentaries reveals that some changes in diction and style crept in during the production of the combined edition, yet the existence of these discrepancies has not become universal knowledge amongst sinologists. While these emendations may have been made with due consideration, astute scholars still follow the original commentary, but some have made ＂corrections＂ based on the combined edition. Chen Shan and Ruan Yuan have argued that the separate commentary used by He Huang for his redaction of the Guliang was a manuscript written by Li Zhonglu in the Ming dynasty, and contemporary scholars believe that this manuscript is the ancestor of the three extant separate commentaries. Close collation of the extant versions of these separate commentaries reveals that they can be divided into two systems: 1) the Qing manuscript of Chen Shan, and the Tianyuzhai manuscript of Qu Yong; and 2) Liu Chenggan's woodblock edition of the Guliang in the Jiayetang collection based on the manuscript of Zhang Jinwu. Moreover, it is likely that the He Huang redaction cited by Ruan Yuan in his critical apparatus was also based on these two systems.

1. 簡逸光(2018)。余仁仲刊本《春秋穀梁傳集解》相關問題考辨。臺大文史哲學報，90，1-37。
   連結：
2. 簡逸光(2018)。余仁仲刊本《春秋穀梁傳集解》相關問題考辨。臺大文史哲學報，90，1-37。
   連結：
3. (1995).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
4. (1997).十三經注疏附挍勘記.臺北:藝文印書館.
5. (1995).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
6. (1999).西安碑林全集.廣州:廣東經濟出版社.
7. (1997).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
8. (1997).十三經注疏附挍勘記.臺北:藝文印書館.
9. (1997).十三經注疏附挍勘記.臺北:藝文印書館.
10. (2015).儒藏.北京:北京大學出版社.
11. (1997).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
12. (1997).十三經注疏附挍勘記.臺北:藝文印書館.
13. (1997).十三經注疏附挍勘記.臺北:藝文印書館.
14. 四部善本叢刊.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
15. (1997).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
16. (1997).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
17. 王溥(1955).唐會要.北京:中華書局.
18. 王應麟(2006).玉海.北京:北京圖書館出版社.
19. 朱彝尊,林慶彰（點校）(2010).經義考.上海:上海古籍出版社.
20. 李霖(2019).宋本群經義疏的編校與刊印.北京:中華書局.
21. 范甯集解：《春秋穀梁傳集解》，收入《四部叢刊》，上海：上海商務印書館，1919 年。
22. 范甯（集解）,楊士勛（疏）(2003).監本春秋穀梁註疏.北京:北京圖書館出版社.
23. 范甯（集解）,楊士勛（疏）(2003).監本附音春秋穀梁註疏.北京:北京圖書館出版社.
24. 徐彥(2004).公羊疏.北京:北京圖書館出版社.
25. 徐彥撰，劉承幹刊：《春秋公羊疏》，收入《嘉業堂叢書》，上海：吳興劉氏嘉業堂，1928年。
26. 郝經,秦雪清（點校）(2006).郝文忠公陵川文集.太原:山西人民出版社.
27. 張麗娟(2009)。《穀梁》單疏本與注疏合刻本考。儒家典籍與思想研究，北京:
28. 張麗娟(2013).宋代經書注疏刊刻研究.北京:北京大學出版社.
29. 脫脫(1977).宋史.北京:中華書局.
30. 許慎,段玉裁（注）(1996).說文解字注.臺北:黎明文化事業公司.
31. 野間文史(1989)。春秋正義の世界。廣島:溪水社。
32. 陸德明(2006).經典釋文.北京:北京圖書館出版社.
33. 楊士勛疏：《穀梁疏》，收入《嘉業堂叢書》，上海：吳興劉氏嘉業堂，1916 年。
34. 楊士勛撰，瞿鏞抄：《春秋穀梁疏》，清抄本。
35. 葉夢得,侯忠義（點校）(1984).石林燕語.北京:中華書局.
36. 劉承幹：《穀梁疏校勘記》，收入《嘉業堂叢書》，上海：吳興劉氏嘉業堂，1916 年。
37. 劉昫(1975).舊唐書.北京:中華書局.
38. 顧永新(2020)。正經注疏合刻早期進程蠡測—以題名更易和內容構成為中心。文史，2，59-104。
39. 顧野王撰，陳彭年等重修：《大廣益會玉篇》，收入《四部叢刊》，上海：上海商務印書館，1929 年。