题名

電子載貨證券貨物交付程序及錯誤交付之責任

并列篇名

Delivery Process and Liability for Misdelivery in Electronic Bills of Lading

DOI

10.6402/TPJ.200212.0841

作者

賴阿蕊(A-Jui Lai);吳培基(Pei-Chi Wu)

关键词

電子資料交換 ; 電子載貨證券規則 ; 錯誤交付 ; 海運 ; Electronic data interchange ; Rules for electronic bills of lading ; Misdelivery ; Maritime

期刊名称

運輸計劃季刊

卷期/出版年月

31卷4期(2002 / 12 / 30)

页次

841 - 852

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

傳統使用之紙本載貨證券近年來備受批評,主要有三方面:寄送費時、易遭偽造、高處理成本。電子載貨證券乃是載貨證券資料經由電子通訊傳送。由於其處理成本低廉,傳遞速度快,各界咸盼其使用以避免紙本載貨證券的缺失。國際海事委員會(Comité Maritime International, CMI)於1990年制定電子載貨證券規則,其主要架構在電子資料交換(electronic data interchange, EDI)技術。電子載貨證券之採用,固然可減少紙本載貨證券之缺失,但仍難保證不會有貨物錯誤交付之情形。電子載貨證券之順利運作,仍有賴建立一完善規劃之貨物交付程序(delivery process),規範運送人及持有人之權益。本文從紙本載貨證券之相關規定及案例出磨,探討電子載貨證券之相關規定、交付程序設計及運送人錯誤交付之責任等問題。

英文摘要

Bills of lading in paper form have been criticized these years for being time-consuming, costly, and open to fraud. Electronic bills of lading are mainly data contained in bills of lading transmitted electronically. Since the cost is down and the speed is up, almost all parties involved welcome electronic bills of lading to avoid the disadvantages of paper bills of lading. In 1990 Comité Maritime International (CMI) proposes rules for electronic bills of lading, of which the underlying technology is mainly based on electronic data interchange (EDI). Although using electronic bills of lading does reduce risks in using paper bills of lading, it does not guarantee that misdelivery of goods will never happen. Successful operation of electronic bills of lading still depends on a well-defined delivery process, which clearly specifies the carrier and the holder liabilities. In this paper starting from related regulations and legal cases in paper bills of lading, we addressed the regulations, the design of delivery process, and the carrier's liability for misdelivery in electronic bills of lading.

主题分类 工程學 > 交通運輸工程
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. (2000)。海商法。
  2. (1995).Ocean Bills of Lading: Traditional Forms, Substitutes, and EDI Systems.Hague:Kluwer Law International.
  3. (1999).Motis Exports Ltd. vs. Dampskilskabet AF 1912.Lloyd's Law Reports,1
  4. (2000).Motis Exports Ltd. vs. Dampskilskabet AF 1912.Lloyd's Law Reports,1
  5. (2001)。電子簽章法。
  6. (2000)。民法。
  7. Assuranceforeningen Skuld (Gjensidig)(2001).Statutes and Rules.
  8. BOLERO(1999).Bolero Rulebook.
  9. BOLERO(1999).Digital Signatures in the Bolero System.
  10. BOLERO(1999).Appendix to Bolero Rulebook Operating Procedures.
  11. Comite Maritime International(1990).CMI Rules for Electronic Bills of Lading.
  12. Davenport, B. J.(2000).Misdelivery: A Fundamental Breach? Motis Exports Ltd. vs. Dampskilskabet AF 1912.Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly,4
  13. Faber, D.(1996).Electronic Bills of Lading.Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly,2
  14. Livermore, J.Euarjai, K.(1997).Electronic Bills of Lading: A Progress Report.Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce,28(1)
  15. Livermore, J.Euarjai, K.(1998).Electronic Bills of Lading and Functional Equivalence.The Journal of Information, Law and Technology,2
  16. Schneier, B.(1996).Applied Cryptography.John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
  17. Todd, P.(1999).Delivery Against Forged Bill of Lading - Motis Exports Ltd. vs. Dampskilskabet AF 1912.Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly,4
  18. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law(2001).Possible Future Work on Electronic Commerce: Transfer of Rights in Tangible Goods and Other Rights.New York:
  19. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law(2001).UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures.
  20. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law(1998).UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce with Guide to Enactment 1996 with Additional Article 5 Bis as Adopted in 1998.
  21. Zekos, G. I.(1999).EDI and the Contractual Role of Computerised (Electronic) Bills of Lading.Managerial Law,41(6)
  22. 王昌斌 Wang, Chin-Bin張志清 Chang, Chin-Ching黃俊豪 Hwang, Juen-Haur(2001)。XML/ EDI電子載貨證券之研究。航運季刊 Maritime Quarterly,10(1)
  23. 林志峰 Lin, Chi-Fong(1994)。應用電子資料(EDI)交換方式處理載貨證券所生之法律問題。律師通訊,172
  24. 徐國勇 Hsu, Tommy(2000)。電子載貨證券概述。全國律師 Taiwan Bar Journal,4(3)
  25. 張志清 Chang, Chin-Ching(2000)。載貨證券的功能與貨損索賠:我國海商法與海牙威士比規則相關規定之比較。航運季刊 Maritime Quarterly,9(2)
  26. 曾國雄 Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung張志清 Chang, Chin-Ching(2000)。海商法。航貿文化事業。
  27. 黃裕凱(2001)。21世紀海運電子提單之發展及相關法律問題之研究(四)。中華民國海運月刊 Shipping Monthly,190
  28. 黃裕凱(2001)。21世紀海運電子提單之發展及相關法律問題之研究(二)。中華民國海運月刊 Shipping Monthly,188
  29. 黃裕凱(2001)。21世紀海運電子提單之發展及相關法律問題之研究(一)。中華民國海運月刊 Shipping Monthly,187
  30. 黃裕凱(2001)。21世紀海運電子提單之發展及相關法律問題之研究(三)。中華民國海運月刊 Shipping Monthly,189
  31. 楊仁壽 Yang, Jen-Shou(1998)。運送人不憑載貨證券交付貨物之後果。航貿週刊 Shipping Digest R. O. C.,9809
  32. 楊仁壽 Yang, Jen-Shou(2000)。載貨證券。三民書局。
  33. 楊仁壽 Yang, Jen-Shou(1999)。保證銀行擔保提貨不能免除運送人之責任。航貿週刊 Shipping Digest R. O. C.,9906
  34. 鍾政棋 Chung, Cheng-Chi(2000)。運送人未收回載貨證券交付貨物之責任。運輸計劃 Transportation Planning Journal,29(3)
被引用次数
  1. (2007)。論海上貨運單(Sea Waybill)—兼論最高法院九十年台上字第一七九三號判決。政大法學評論,97,211-265。