應用涉入理論於運具選擇行為之研究

Application of Involvement Theory on Mode Choice Behavior

10.6402/TPJ.200806.0237

賴文泰(Wen-Tai Lai)；呂錦隆(Jin-Long Lu)

運具選擇 ； 涉入 ； 計畫行為理論 ； 結構方程式 ； 混合羅吉特 ； Mode choice ； Involvement ； Theory of planned behavior ； Structural equation model ； Mixed logit model

運輸計劃季刊

37卷2期（2008 / 06 / 30）

237 - 262

繁體中文

在大眾運輸硬體建設曠日費時且建設經費龐大之囿限下，藉由低成本的行銷策略提升大眾運具占有率，已漸受重視且有成功案例。然大眾運具票價優惠、資訊提供等行銷措施可否有效提升大眾運具運量？在過去研究有不同的看法。基於上述背景，本研究引入行銷學中廣被應用的涉入理論，將旅運者依大眾運具涉入程度的高低予以分類，並應用TPB 行為變數採結構方程式建構模型，模型實證分析結果顯示，不同涉入程度旅運者之運具選擇行為具有差異性。而為具體分析此異質性所引發之效果，進一步採顯示性偏好資料建構運具選擇模型，藉以進行彈性分析與不同票價情境之敏感度分析，模擬結果顯示，票價優惠對提升大眾運具運量之效果，大眾運具高涉入族群明顯高於低涉入族群。

Since the construction of public transportation infrastructure is time consuming and expensive, the use of low cost marketing strategies to raise the market share of public transportation is gradually being emphasized, and there are some successful cases. However, in past studies, findings concerning whether the marketing method of pricing discount or travel information provision was an effective way to increase public transportation ridership were not consistent. This study tried to introduce the involvement theory, applied widely in the field of marketing, segmented the travelers according to their involvement in public transportation, and used the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to construct the behavior model. The model results indicated that the travelers' mode choice behaviors varied by their involvement level. In order to analyze the effect of heterogeneity further, this study built a discrete choice model based on travelers' revealed preference data and performed price elasticity analysis. The results showed that the effects of pricing discount on increasing public transportation ridership to travelers with higher level of involvement are significantly greater than those travelers with lower level of involvement.

1. Aarts, H.,Dijksterhuis, A.(2000).The Automatic Activation of Goal-Directed Behaviour: The Case of Travel Habit.Journal of Environmental Psychology,20,75-82.
2. Aarts, H.,Verplanken, B.,van Knippenberg, A.(1998).Predicting Behaviour from Actions in the Past: Repeated Decision Making or a Matter of Habit?.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,28,1355-1374.
3. Ajzen, I.,Kuhl, J.,Beckmann, J. (Eds)(1985).Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior.Heidelberg:Springer.
4. Bagozzi, R. P.(1981).Attitudes, Intention, and Behaviour: A test of Some Key Hypotheses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,41,607-627.
5. Bamberg, S.,Rolle, D.,Weber, C.(2003).Dose Habitual Car Use Not Lead to More Resistance to Change of Travel Mode.Transportation,30,97-108.
6. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural Equations with Latent Variables.New York:Wiley.
7. Bucklin, L. P.(1965).The Informative Role of Advertising.Journal of Advertising Research,5,11-15.
8. Chen, C.,Garling, T.,Kitamura, R.(2004).Activity Rescheduling Reasoned or Habitual?.Transportation Research Part F,7,351-371.
9. Christopher, H. L.(1987).Marketing Public Transit-A Strategic Approach.Praeger Publisher, Westport, CT.
10. Eagly, A. H.,Chaiken, S.(1993).The Psychology of Attitude.Orlando, FL:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
11. Fujii, S.,Garling, T.(2003).Application of Attitude Theory for Improved Predictive Accuracy of Preference Method in Travel Analysis.Transportation Research Part A,37,389-402.
12. Fujii, S.,Kitamura, R.(2003).What Does a One-Month Free Bus Ticket to Do Habitual Drivers? An Experimental Analysis of Habit and Attitude Change.Transportation,30,81-95.
13. Garling, T.,Fujii, S.,Boe, O.(2001).Empirical Test of a Model of Determinants of Script-Based Driving Choice.Transportation Research Part F,4,89-102.
14. Garling, T.,Garvill, J.,Golledge, R. G. (Eds)(1993).Behaviour and Environment: Psychological and Geographical Approaches.North Holland Amsterdam:Elsevier.
15. Garling, T.,Gillholm, R.,Garling, A(1998).Reintroducing Attitude Theory in Travel Behaviour Research: The Validity of an Interactive Interview Procedure to Predict Car Use.Transportation,25,147-167.
16. Garvill, J.,Marell, A.,Nordlund, A.(2003).Effects of Increased Awareness on Choice of Travel Mode.Transportation,30,63-79.
17. Gauthier, H. L.,Shaw, S.(1986).Modeling and Simulation: Modeling of Urban Travel Attitude- Behavior Relationships.Proc. of University of Pittsburgh Annual Conference
18. Houston, M. J.,Rothchild, M. L.,Jain, S. (Ed.)(1978).Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Direction.Chicago:Chicago American Marketing Association.
19. Koppelman, F.,Lyon, P. K.(1981).Attitudinal Analysis of Work/School Travel.Transportation Science,15,233-254.
20. Kuppam, A. R.,Pendyala, R. M.,Rahman, S.(2003).Analysis of the Role of Traveler Attitude and Perceptions in Explaining Mode-Choice Behavior.Transportation Research Board,1676,69-76.
21. Laurent, G.,Kapferer, J. N.(1985).Measuring Consumer Behavior Profile.Journal of Marketing Research,22,41-53.
22. McFadden, D.,Train, K.(2000).Mixed MNL Model of Discrete Response.Journal of Applied Econometrics,15,447-470.
23. Olshavsky, R. W.,Granbois, D. H.(1979).Consumer Decision Making-Fact or Fiction?.Journal of Consumer Research,6,93-100.
24. Ouellette, J. A.,Wood, W.(1998).Habit and Intention in Everyday Life: The Mutliple Processes by Which Past Behaviour Predicts Future Behaviour.Psychological Bulletin,124,54-74.
25. Outwater, M.,Castleberry, S.,Shiftan, Y.,Ben-Akiva, M.,Zhou, Y. S.,Kuppam, A.(2003).Attitudinal Market Segmentation Approach to Mode Choice and Ridership Forecasting: Structural Equation Modeling.Transportation Research Board,1854,32-42.
26. Petty, R. E.,Daniel, R. T.,Philip, A. D.(1983).Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Content on Cognitive Structure?.Journal of Consumer Research Board,10,135-146.
27. Robertson, T. S.,Joan, Z.,Scott, W.(1984).Consumer Behavior.New York:Scott Foresman and Company.
28. Ronis, D. L.,Yates, J. F.,Kirscht, J. P.,Pratkanis, A. R.,Breckler, S. J.,Greenwald, A. G. (Eds)(1989).Attitude, Decision, and Habits as Determinants of Repeated Behaviour.N. J.:Attitude Structure and Function.
29. Triandis, H. C.(1977).Interpersonal Behaviour.Monterey, CA:Brooks/Cole.
30. Verplanken, B.,Aarts, H.,van Knippenberg, A.(1997).Habit, Information Acquisition, and the Process of Making Travel Mode Choices.European Journal of Social Psychology,27,539-560.
31. Verplanken, B.,Aarts, H.,van Knippenberg, C.(1994).Attitude Versus General Habit: Antecedents of Travel Mode Choice.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,24,285-300.
32. Westbrook, R. A.,Claes, F.(1979).Patterns of Information Source Usage Among Durable Goods Buyer.Journal of Marketing Research,16,303-312.
33. Zaichkowshy, J. L.(1985).Measuring the Involvement Construct.Journal of Consumer Research,12,341-352.
34. 林威成(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所。
35. 姜容新(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學交通運輸研究所。
36. 黃俊英、賴文彬(1990)。涉入的理論發展與實務應用。管理科學學報，7(1)，15-29。
37. 楊志文(2003)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立成功大學交通管理科學系。
38. 楊家銘(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學系研究所。
39. 廖仁哲(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。
40. 臺北市交通局(2001)。捷運板橋線（龍山寺站－新埔站）及小南門線（中正紀念堂站－西門站）營運後旅客問卷調查報告。
41. 鄭燕翔(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所。

1. 蔡雅惠、張寧(2016)。提升高雄捷運營運量之研究：多元利害關係人之觀點。商略學報，8(1)，55-76。
2. 陳暐婷、胡凱傑(2015)。服務失誤嚴重性、歸因、企業形象與涉入程度對服務補救期望之影響─以臺鐵為例。品質學報，22(3)，183-211。
3. 郭岑伊,林正士(2013)。A Study on Causal Relationships among Travel Transport Service Involvement, Service Dependence, and Service Identity: A Case of Mini-three-links。國立金門大學學報，3，17-36。
4. 賴文泰(2011)。不同大眾運輸供給地區旅運者之大眾運具使用行為分析。運輸計劃季刊，40(3)，287-308。
5. 林正士、吳英偉(2014)。小三通旅運商業模式初探：跨界與跨運具觀點。餐旅暨觀光，11(3)，137-168。
6. 林正士、周軒逸(2017)。服務品質與服務補救期望對旅運涉入之影響：以金廈小三通為例。品質學報，24(1)，60-79。
7. 溫傑華、曾幸敏、傅強、陳韋穎、邱裕鈞、林育瑄、王穆衡(2014)。旅運者運具選擇行為異質性之研析：混合羅吉特模式之應用。運輸計劃季刊，43(2)，143-172。
8. 謝淑芬(2018)。旅遊交通工具的選擇對旅遊消費支出決策影響之研究：Seemingly Unrelated Regression估計法。觀光休閒學報，24(3)，295-320。
9. 張新立、林燕姬、王國川、Hedeker, Donald(2014)。多個層級、關聯隨機效果邏輯迴歸模型應用於探討休閒旅遊者習慣性的運具選擇行為及其影響因素。運輸學刊，26(4)，497-528。
10. 鍾政偉,蔣宇婷(2020)。以計畫行為理論探討社群媒體搜尋行為之研究－兼論社群媒體之差異比較。Journal of Data Analysis，15(4)，69-101。
11. (2010)。動漫迷生活型態對產品購買行為之影響─以萌系動漫產品為例。傳播管理學刊，11(2)，28-51。