不同大眾運輸供給地區旅運者之大眾運具使用行為分析

Analying Mass Transit Travel Behavior in Areas With Different Mass Transit Supply

10.6402/TPJ.201109.0056

賴文泰(Wen-Tai Lai)

大眾運輸 ； 意向 ； 習慣 ； 涉入 ； Mass transit ； Intention ； Habit ； Involvement

運輸計劃季刊

40卷3期（2011 / 09 / 30）

287 - 308

繁體中文

本研究應用MOA理論比較大眾運輸供給較佳、較差地區旅運者之大眾運具使用行為，並探討影響大眾運具使用行為之因素。文中首先依據旅運者所在地區大眾運輸供給之良窳為分類，採動機－機會－能力理論探討二地區旅運者大眾運具使用行為之差異；其次，為探討「社經特性」、「運具屬性」、「意向」、「習慣」、「涉入」、「環境」等變數對大眾運具使用行為之影響效果，乃建構一項包含結構方程模式、間斷性選擇模式之整合模型。其實證分析結果顯示，大眾運輸供給較佳地區之旅運者，對於大眾運具的評價明顯較優；至於各變數影響大眾運具使用行為之效果方面，「意向」是影響最顯著之變數，因此，致力於可正向提升大眾運具「意向」之軟、硬體措施，將有助於提升大眾運具之市場占有率。

This study applies the MOA theory to compare the consumer behavior of mass transit users between residents in an area with good public transport service versus one with poor service, and to determine the influent factors on the consumer behavior in using mass transit. A questionnaire was developedand disseminated to a random sample of passengers. The sampled passengers were first categorized into groups by indices of mass transit servicedevelopment/quality, and based on the theory of MOA, to reveal the different behaviors of mass transit usage in the two areas. Second, an integration of discrete choice model and structural equation module was then developed by LISREAL, to determine the impacts of social-economic variables, modalattributes, behavioral intentions, habit, and involvement on consumer behavior. Residents in the area with good mass transit services were found to have better opinions on mass transit. Behavioral intention was found to have the most significant impact in the two areas. According to the results, improving mass transit services would not only increase intention to use mass transit, but would also increase the market share of mass transit.

1. 胡琬珮(2008)。考慮異質性、相關性及內生性等不同組合潛在變數之選擇模式：以國道客運北高線為例。運輸計劃季刊，37(2)，165-196。
   連結：
2. 賴文泰、呂錦隆(2008)。應用涉入理論於運具選擇行為之研究。運輸計劃季刊，37(2)，237-262。
   連結：
3. 臺北市政府主計處，中華民國 97年臺北市統計年報，民國 98年。
4. (1985).Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior.
5. Manchester Metrolink, http//www.railway-technology.com/projects/Manchester/index.html, 2001.
6. 高雄市政府主計處，高雄市 97年統計年報，民國 98年。
7. Aarts, H.,Dijksterhuis, A.(2000).The Automatic Activation of Goal-Directed Behaviour: The Case of Travel Habit.Journal of Environmental Psychology,20,75-82.
8. Anable, J.,Lane, B.,Kelay, T.(2006).Final ReportFinal Report,London:UK Department for Transport.
9. Ashoki, K.,Dillon, W. R.,Yuan, S.(2002).Extended Discrete Choice Models to Incorporate Attitudinal and Other Latent Variables.Journal of Marketing Research,39,31-46.
10. Bamberg, S.(2000).The Promotion of New Behavior by Forming an Implementation Intention: Results of a Field Experiment in the Domain of Travel Mode Choice.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,30,1903-1922.
11. Bamberg, S.,Rolle, D.,Weber, C.(2003).Dose Habitual Car Use Not Lead to More Resistance to Change of Travel Mode.Transportation,30,97-108.
12. Ben-Akiva, M.,McFadden, D.,Garling, T.,Gopinath, D.,Walker, J.,Bolduc, D.,Borsch-Supan, A.,De lquie, P.,Larichev, O.,Morikawa , T.,Polydoropoulou, A.,Rao, V.(1999).Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior.Marketing Letters,10(3),187-203.
13. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural Equations with Latent Variables.New York:Wiley.
14. Cullinane, S. L.(1992).Attitudes towards the Car in the UK: Some Implications for Policies on Congestion and the Environment.Transportation Research Part A,26A,291-301.
15. Domarchi, C.,Gillholm, R.,Tudela, A.,Conzalez, A.(2008).Effect of Attitudes, Habit and Affective Appraisal on Mode Choice: An Application to University Workers.Transportation,35,585-599.
16. Fujii, S.,Kitamura, R.(2003).What Does a One-Month Free Bus Ticket to Do Habitual Drivers? An Experimental Analysis of Habit and Attitude Change.Transportation,30,81-95.
17. Garling, T.,Fujii, S.,Boe, O.(2001).Empirical Test of a Model of Determinants of Script-Based Driving Choice.Transportation Research Part F,4,89-102.
18. Garvill, J.,Marell, A.,Nordlund, A.(2003).Effects of Increased Awareness on Choice of Travel Mode.Transportation,30,63-79.
19. Green, P. E.(1984).Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository Review.Journal of Marketing Research,21,151-169.
20. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2006).Multivariate Data Analysis.New Jersey:Pearson Education.
21. Hoyer, W. D.,MacInnis, D. J.(2006).Consumer Behavior.Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
22. Johansson, M.,Heldt, T.,Johansson, P.(2006).The Effects of Attitudes and Personality Traits on Mode Choice.Transportation. Research Part A,40,507-525.
23. Kitamura, R.(1989).A Causal Analysis of Car Ownership and Transit Use.Transportation,16,155-173.
24. Lewin, K.(1951).Field Theory in Social Science.New York:Harper and Row.
25. Madanat, S. M.,Yang, C. Y.,Yen, Y. M.(1995).Analysis of Stated Route Diversion Intentions under Advanced Traveler Information Systems Using Latent Variable Modeling.Transportation Research Records,1485,10-17.
26. Matthies, E.,Klöckner, C. A.,Pressner, C. L.(2006).Applying a Modified Moral Decision Making to Change Habitual Car Use: How Can Commitment Be Effective?.Applied Psychology: An International Review,55,91-106.
27. Meyer, M. D.(1999).Demand Management as an Element of Transportation Policy: Using Carrots and Sticks to Influence Travel Behaviour.Transportation Research Part A,33,575-599.
28. Morikawa, T.,Ben-Akiva, M.,McFadden, D.(2002).Discrete Choice Models Incorporating Revealed Preferences and Psychometric Data.Econometric Models in Marketing,16,29-55.
29. Olander, F.,Thøgersen, J.(1995).Understanding of Consumer Behaviour as a Prerequisite for Environmental Protection.Journal of Consumer Policy,18,317-357.
30. Pharoah, T.(1992).Less Traffic, Better Towns.London:Friends of the Earth.
31. Rotschild, M.(1999).Carrots, Sticks, and Promises: A Conceptual Framework for the Management of Public Health and Social Issue Behaviors.Journal of Marketing,63(4),24-38.
32. Staats, H.,Harland, P.,Wilke, H. A. M.(2004).Effecting Durable Change a Team Approach to Improve Environmental Behavior in the Household.Environment & Behavior,36,341-367.
33. Stern, P. C.(2000).Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior.Journal of Social Issues,56,407-424.
34. Thogersen, J.(2009).Promoting Public Transport as a Subscription Service : Effects of a Free Month Travel Card.Transport Policy,16,335-343.
35. Verplanken, B.,Aarts, H.(1999).Habit, Attitude, and Planned Behaviour: Is Habit an Empty Construct or an Interesting Case of Goal-Directed Automatically?.European Review of Social Psychology,101-134.
36. Verplanken, B.,Aarts, H.,van Knippenberg, C.(1994).Attitude Versus General Habit: Antecedents of Travel Mode Choice.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,24,285-300.
37. Verplanken, B.,Orbell, S.(2003).Reflections on Past Behavior: A Self-Report Index of Habit Strength.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,33,1313-1330.
38. Walker, J. L.(2001).Department of Civil Environment Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
39. Wei, C. H.,Kao, C. Y..Measuring Traveler Involvement in Urban Public Transport Services: The Case of Kaohsiung.Transport Policy
40. Yi, M. Y.,Jackson, J. D.,Park, J. S.,Probst, J. C.(2006).Understanding Information Acceptance by Individual Professionals.Information & Management,43,350-363.
41. Zaichkowshy, J. L.(1985).Measuring the Involvement Construct.Journal of Consumer Research,12,341-352.
42. 中華民國運輸學會(2009)。,未出版
43. 交通部統計處(2010)。,未出版
44. 高雄市政府交通局(2009)。,未出版
45. 高雄市政府捷運局(2009)。,未出版
46. 趙韋翔(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所。
47. 賴文泰、吳義隆(2007)。應用計畫行為理論於運具選擇行為之研究─以高雄市為例。城市發展半年刊，3，63-79。

1. 饒志堅、張景福、林淑敏(2014)。汽車客運路線特性與班次對運量之影響─以分量迴歸分析。運輸計劃季刊，43(4)，343-366。
2. 蘇偉強,賴宗裕,吳可兒(2022)。步行環境對民眾搭乘捷運意願之影響－以臺北市為例。都市與計劃，49(2)，125-148。