题名

交通建設BOT計畫特許年期與權利金議題談判模式之研究

并列篇名

A Bargaining Model for Concession Period and Royalty for Transportation BOT Projects

作者

康照宗(Chao-Chung Kang);馮正民(Cheng-Min Feng);王世寧(Shin-Ning Wang)

关键词

BOT計畫 ; 特許年期 ; 權利金 ; 雙議題談判 ; Rubinstein議價賽局 ; BOT projects ; Concession period ; Royalty ; Two-issue negotiation ; Rubinstein bargaining game

期刊名称

運輸計劃季刊

卷期/出版年月

42卷3期(2013 / 09 / 30)

页次

247 - 274

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

BOT計畫之權利金與特許年期為特許契約的重要談判議題。雖然已有文獻對特許期限或權利金收取與訂定有所探討;但是,過去少有文獻對權利金與特許年期議題進行雙議題談判研究分析。因此,本研究運用Rubinstein議價賽局理論,構建權利金與特許年期的雙議題談判模式。本研究有別於過去文獻所進行的權利金談判模式,將折現因子、議價成本、談判次數、談判能力、談判起始值與談判次數限制等變數納入模式,藉以詮釋政府與最優申請人對權利金及特許年期雙議題的談判行為。透過本研究 模式,政府與最優申請人可根據各議題之權重,進而決定其最適之權利金與特許年期的談判結果,從而可獲得雙邊報酬最大的最佳協議解與報酬最小的最劣解。經由本模式之驗證結果顯示,本研究所構建雙議題談判模式可詮釋雙方在BOT契約之權利金與特許年期共同議價過程,此模式可作為BOT特許契約雙議題談判分析之參考。

英文摘要

The royalty and concession period of contract are important negotiation issues in BOT concession contract. However, issues of royalty and concession period do not have a reasonable standard to follow at present, and the both issues of royalty and concession period negotiation model have seldom been explored in the past studies. So this study established the bargaining model for concession period and royalty issues through the Rubinstein bargaining game theory for transportation BOT projects, which is different from the past single-issue bargaining model. The bargaining model includes discount factor, bargaining cost, negotiation ability, negotiation starting value, the number of negotiation and the number of negotiation restrictions. Through the model of this study, both the government and the optimal applicant can determinate the most appropriate outcome of the negotiations after weighing each issue, and they can also find the optimal agreement solution of their own largest reward and the worst solution of their smallest reward. In addition, the resulting model enabled a better understanding of the BOT concession negotiation process. Moreover, the study can provide a BOT negotiation strategy for both decision-makers and administrative department with some BOT policy amendments.

主题分类 工程學 > 交通運輸工程
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 林永盛、張有恆(2005)。BOT 計畫非線性談判模式之研究-以負效用資源分配為例。運輸學刊,17(1),27-64。
    連結:
  2. 林永盛、張有恆(2005)。BOT 計畫談判模式構建之研究。管理學報,22(6),783-804。
    連結:
  3. 康照宗、馮正民、郭秋鷰(2008)。BOT 計畫特許契約之權利金負擔議題分析。管理與系統,15(4),645-664。
    連結:
  4. 康照宗、馮正民、黃思綺(2004)。以政府觀點發展BOT 計畫財務模型。運輸計劃季刊,33(1),1-28。
    連結:
  5. 交通部基隆港務局,徵求民間機構參與興建暨營運臺北港貨櫃儲運中心─建設財務報告書,民國 90年。
  6. Chiou, Y. C.,Lan, L. W.(2007).The Royalty Models for Transport Infrastructure BOT Projects.Transpormetrica,2(3),175-197.
  7. Cross, J. G.(1965).A Theory of the Bargaining Process.The America Economic Review,55(1),67-94.
  8. Engel, E.,Fisher, R.,Galetovic, A.(2001).Least-Present-Value-of-Revenue Actions and Highway Franchising.Journal of Political Economy,109,993-1020.
  9. Engel, E.,Fisher, R.,Galetovic, A.(2003).,Washington, D.C.:.
  10. Engel, E.,Fisher, R.,Galetovic, A.(1997).Highway Franchising in Pitfalls and Opportunities.The America Economic Review,87(2),68-72.
  11. Kang, C. C.,Feng, C. M.,Kuo, C. Y.(2012).Comparison of Royalty Methods for Build-Operate-Transfer Projects from a Negotiation Perspective.Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,48(4),830-842.
  12. Muthoo, A.(1999).Bargaining Theory with Applications.UK:University of Cambridge.
  13. Ng, S. T.,Xie, J.,Cheung, Y. K.,Jefferies, M.(2007).A Simulation Model for Optimizing the Concession Period of Public-Private Partnerships Schemes.International Journal of Project Management,25,791-798.
  14. Ng, S. T.,Xie, J.,Skitmore, M.,Cheung,Y. K.(2007).A Fuzzy Simulation Model for Evaluating the Concession Items of Public-Private Partnerships Schemes.Automatic in Construction,17,22-29.
  15. Nge, L.,Tiong, R. L. K.,Alum, J.(1997).Automated Approach to Negotiation of BOT Contracts.Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering,11(2),121-128.
  16. Nombela, G.,Gine, S.,de Rus.(2004).Flexible-Term Contracts for Road Franchising.Transportation Research Part A,38,163-179.
  17. Rubinstein, A.(1982).Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model.Econometrica,50(1),92-109.
  18. Shen, L. Y.,Bao, H. J.,Lu, W. S.(2007).Using Bargaining-Game Theory for Negotiating Concession Period for BOT-Type Contract.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,133(5),385-392.
  19. Shen, L. Y.,Li, H.,Li, Q. M.(2002).Alternative Concession Model for Build Operate Transfer Contract Projects.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,128(4),326-330.
  20. Tan, Z.,Yang, H.(2012).Flexible Build-Operate-Transfer Contracts for Road Franchising under Demand Uncertainty.Transportation Research Part B,46,1419-1439.
  21. Tiong, L. K.,Alum, J.(1997).Final Negotiation in Competitive BOT Tender.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,123(1),6-10.
  22. Ye, S.,Tiong, R. L. K.(2003).The Effect of Concession Period Design on Completion Risk Management of BOT Projects.Construction Management and Economics,21,471-482.
  23. Zhang, X. Q.,AbouRizk, S. M.(2006).Determining a Reasonable Concession Period for Private Sector Provision ofPublic Works and Services.Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,33(5),622-631.
  24. 李明聰(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。交通大學土木工程研究所。
  25. 陳孟慧(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。交通大學交通運輸研究所。