兩岸海運直航後貨櫃航商船舶設籍關鍵影響因素之分析

An Analysis of Key Influential Factors for Ship Registration by Taiwanese Container Shipping Lines After the Cross-Strait Direct Shipping Links

賀天君(Tien-Chun Ho)；鍾政棋(Cheng-Chi Chung)；李選士(Hsuan-Shih Lee)

直航 ； 貨櫃船 ； 貨櫃航商 ； 船舶設籍 ； 航運政策 ； Direct shipping ； Container ships ； Ship registrations ； Container shipping lines ； Shipping policy

運輸計劃季刊

43卷4期（2014 / 12 / 30）

393 - 410

繁體中文

面對激烈競爭之航運市場，船籍選擇問題已成為航商的重要營運策略之一。過去兩岸因政治因素，為臺灣航商船舶出籍的主要原因之一。兩岸已於2008年底海運直航，面臨兩岸航運營運環境改變，航商船舶設籍考量因素已有不同。本文旨在探討兩岸開放海運直航後，對臺灣貨櫃航商船舶設籍之影響。本文基於貨櫃航商立場，構建船舶設籍影響因素評估架構，研究設計以PEST為基礎，包括政治、經濟、社會與科技4個構面和15項評估準則，以問卷調查方式透過修正式德菲法（MDM）篩選評估準則，再與國內航商船舶設籍高階經理人進行深度訪談，探求海運直航後船舶設籍影響因素之重要性。本文研究發現，兩岸海運直航後，貨櫃航商船舶設籍首要關鍵影響因素為所得稅制因素，其次依序為規避政府管制、缺乏優惠措施、運費稅之負擔、船員成本因素、船舶控制程度與行政管理措施。本文研究結果可提供貨櫃航商船舶設籍以及航港主管機關擬定兩岸航運政策之參考。

Faced with fierce market competition, the ship registration is one of the important operating strategies for shipping companies. The political factors had become one of the reasons of flagging out for the shipping industry in Taiwan. And after cross-strait direct shipping started in 2008, the situation has changed; the choice of ship registration may have the different alternatives. Based on the side of container shipping operation, the paper used the PEST approach as the basis of analytic framework to construct the factors hierarchy contained four criteria: 'political,' 'economic,' 'social,' and 'technological' factors with fifteen subcriteria. This article adopted the modified Delphi method (MDM) to select subcriteria, and also used in-depth interviews with the high level ship managers to rank the importance of the key influential factors for ship registration from questionnaires. The outcomes showed that the first key influential factor of ship registration by Taiwanese container shipping lines after cross-strait direct shipping link is 'the income tax,' and follows as 'avoiding government regulations,' 'the deficiency of incentive,' 'the charging of freight tax,' 'the cost of crews,' 'administrative measures,' and 'the degree of control ship'. These findings will provide as a good reference for container shipping lines in determining ship registration, and will help government authorities in formulating supportive shipping policies.

1. 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究季刊，3(2)，122-136。
   連結：
2. 交通部航港局，「交通部航政監理資訊系統」，https://web02.mtnet.gov.tw/mtnet2/map.htm，民國102 年
3. 交通部，「交通部統計月報」，http://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=580&parentpath =0,6,578，民國102 年
4. Aguilar, F. J.(1967).Scanning the Business Environment.New York:Macmillan.
5. Alderton, T.,Winchester, N.(2002).Globalisation and De-regulation in the Maritime Industry.Marine Policy,26(1),35-43.
6. Celik, M.,Er, I. D.,Ozok, A. F.(2009).Application of Fuzzy Extended AHP Methodology on Shipping Registry Selection: The Case of Turkish Maritime Industry.Transportation Research Part E,36(1),190-198.
7. Celik, M.,Kandakoglu, A.(2012).Maritime Policy Development against Ship Flagging Out Dilemma Using a Fuzzy Quantified SWOT Analysis.Maritime Policy and Management,39(4),401-421.
8. Celik, M.,Topcu, Y. I.(2014).A Decision-making Solution to Ship Flagging Out via Administrative Maritime Strategies.Maritime Policy and Management,41(1),112-127.
9. Faherty, V.(1979).Continuing Social Work Education: Results of a Delphi Survey.Journal of Education for Social Work,15(1),12-19.
10. Haralambides, H. E.,Yang, J.(2003).A Fuzzy Set Theory Approach to Flagging Out: Towards a New Chinese Shipping Policy.Marine Policy,27(1),13-22.
11. Hwang, C. C.,Chung, C. C.(2007).An Analysis of Key Influence Factors for Bulk Carrier Registrations in Taiwan.Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies (EASTS),5,631-646.
12. ISL(2013).Shipping Statistics and Market Review
13. Kelly, M.,Maynard-Moody, S.(1993).Policy Analysis in the Post-positivist Era: Engaging Stakeholders in Evaluating the Economic Development District's Program.Public Administration Review,53(2),135-142.
14. Lirn, T. C.,Tanooulu, H. A.,Beynon, M. J.,Beresford, A. K. C.(2004).An Application of AHP on Transshipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective.Maritime Economics and Logistics,6(1),70-91.
15. Murry, J. W.,Hammons, J. O.(1995).Delphi: A Versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research.The Review of Higher Education,18(4),423-436.
16. Nathan, L.(2004).Global Collective Bargaining on Flag of Convenience Shipping.British Journal of Industrial Relations,42(1),47-67.
17. Ritchie, J. R. Brent(ed.),Golden, Charles R.(ed.)(1987).Travel, Tourism, and Hospitality Research - A Handbook for Managers and Researchers.New York:Wiley.
18. Thanopoulon, H. A.(1998).What Price the Flag? The Terms of Competitiveness in Shipping.Marine Policy,22(4-5),359-374.
19. Veenstra, A.,Bergantino, A. S.(2000).Changing Ownership Structures in the Dutch Fleet.Maritime Policy and Management,27(2),175-189.
20. Wiegmans, B. W.,Hoest, A.,Notteboom, T. E.(2008).Port and Terminal Selection by Deep-sea Container Operators.Maritime Policy and Management,35(4),517-534.
21. Yang, S. H.,Chung, C. C.(2013).Direct Shipping across the Taiwan Strait: Flag Selections and Policy Issues.Maritime Policy and Management,40(6),534-558.
22. Yannopoulos, G. N.(1988).The Economics of Flagging Out.Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,22(2),197-207.
23. 何羿儒(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。元培科技大學企業管理研究所。
24. 汪岱蓉(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理研究所。
25. 林芳如(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中山大學國際高階經營碩士班。
26. 林雅苓(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理研究所。
27. 袁智清(2003)。博士論文(博士論文)。中國文化大學中山學術研究所。
28. 陳一平、邱盛生、張志清(1998)。成立國輪造船及購船融資基金之研究。航運季刊，7(2)，1-17。
29. 陳素卿(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學海洋環境研究所。
30. 黃玉玲(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理研究所。
31. 楊世豪(2013)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理研究所。
32. 葉淑鈞(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理研究所。
33. 鍾政棋(2004)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立交通大學交通運輸研究所。
34. 鍾政棋、張雅涵、張志清(2006)。我國船舶設籍問題與因應對策之研擬。航運季刊，15(3)，41-62。
35. 織田政夫(1979)。海運政策論。日本東京:成山堂書店。

1. 鍾政棋、賀天君、李選士、王思淳(2016)。臺灣貨櫃航商選擇船舶管理公司關鍵影響因素之分析。運輸計劃季刊，45(3)，217-234。