濃霧中前車緊急煞車時道路駕駛人對前車相對速度感知與反應時間不確性之關聯－以海森堡不確定性原理觀點

UNCERTAINTIES OF PERCEIVED RELATIVE SPEED AND REACTION TIME UNDER FOGGY AND EMERGENCY BRAKING CONDITIONS-IN A PERSPECTIVE IMITATING HEISENBERG UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE

陳穆臻(Mu-Chen Chen)；吳熙仁(Hsi-Jen Wu)

濃霧 ； 前車相對速度感知 ； 量子光流 ； 反應時間 ； 不確定性 ； Foggy condition ； Perceived relative speed ； Quantum optical flow ； Reaction time ； uncertainty

運輸計劃季刊

46卷2期（2017 / 06 / 30）

117 - 140

繁體中文

濃霧影響道路駕駛人對速度和距離感知的判斷；然而，在濃霧中前車緊急煞車時，駕駛人對前車相對速度感知與反應時間不確性是複雜的，需要進一步探討。本研究嘗試以海森堡不確定性原理觀點出發，除探討前述特殊環境與路況下，兩者不確性之權衡關聯性外，亦設計1個二階段實驗，依序驗證兩項假說：（1）假設濃霧中，本車駕駛人對前車相對速度感知所產生之心理物能動能的不確定性，與其反應時間不確定性之間，存在權衡關聯性；（2）假設濃霧中，在駕駛心理負荷和相對速度感知平均值條件下，相對速度感知與反應時間不確性存在權衡關聯性。實驗結果顯示兩項權衡關聯性均存在。另外，比較其結果與附加晴朗天候條件之實驗結果，發現濃霧和晴朗天候之2個動作常數無明顯差異。本研究結果有助於解釋濃霧中跟車現象，激發新的駕駛人感知車流理論之發展。

Foggy weather conditions affect uncertainties of driver perceptual judgments of speed and distance. However in a heavy foggy condition and a leading vehicle braking condition uncertainties of perceived relative speed and reaction time are complicated and need to be identified. If those uncertainties in a foggy weather condition exist in a perspective imitating Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, then some phenomena for the following driver behaviors can be explained. The purpose of the research aimed to test the first hypothesis that explained a trade-off relationship between uncertainties of perceived psychological energy and uncertainties of reaction time of following vehicle drivers, and the second hypothesis that stated a trade-off relation between uncertainties of reaction time and uncertainties of perceived relative speed in regard to averages of perceived relative speed and mental workload One additional experiment have conducted giving comparisons with those uncertainties exist in a clear weather condition having been tested in Sheu's two-stage experiment based on a quantum optical flow-based model. The findings of this study not only show that those uncertainties also exist in foggy and braking conditions but also indicate the statistical significant no-difference between the two action constants in foggy and clear weather conditions. The results may help to characterize car following phenomena in foggy conditions under driver perception uncertainties and to stimulate new ideas for the development of dynamic, stochastic and time-varying driver perception model and theories.

1. 石裕川、林景瑞(2013)。不同天候下處置道路施工時對男女駕駛腦波及心率變異的影響。都市交通，27(1)，14-24。
   連結：
2. 維基百科，「光流法」，https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/光流法，民國106 年。
3. 維基百科，「不確定性原理」，https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/不確定性原理，民國105年。
4. Baker, R. G. V.(1999).On the Quantum Mechanics of Optic Flow and Its Application to Driving in Uncertain Environments.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior,2(1),27-53.
5. Briggs, J. S.,Rost, J. M.(2001).On the Derivation of the Time-Dependent Equation of Schrödinger.Foundations of Physics,31(4),693-712.
6. Dewar, R.(1999).Road User, Traffic Engineering Handbook.Washington, DC:Institute of Transportation Engineers.
7. Doğan, S.,Temiz, M. S.,Külür, S.(2010).Real Time Speed Estimation of Moving Vehicles from Side View Images from An Uncalibrated Video Camera.Sensors,10,4805-4824.
8. Ferson, S.,Kreinovich, V.,Hajagos, J.,Oberkampf, W.,Ginzburg, L.(2007).,New York:Applied Biomathematics.
9. Fitts, P. M.,Posner, M. I.(1967).Human Perfomance.Belmont, CA:Brooks/Cole.
10. Gale, A. G.,Brown, I. D.,Haslegrave, C. M.,Moorhead, I.,Taylor, S. P.(1991).Vision in Vehicles III.Amsterdam:Elsevier.
11. Gibson, J. J.(1966).The Senses Considered as a Perceptual System.Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
12. Hancock, P. A.(Ed.),Desmond, P. A.(Ed.)(2001).Stress, Workload and Fatigue.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
13. Hoffmann, E. R.,Mortimer, R. G.(1996).Scaling of Relative Velocity Vehicles.Accident and Analysis and Prevention,28(4),415-421.
14. Hoogendoorn, R. G.,Tamminga, G.,Hoogendoorn, S. P.,Daamen, W.(2010).Longitudinal Driving Behavior under Adverse Weather Conditions: Adaptation Effects, Model Performance and Freeway Capacity in Case of Fog.Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (itsc),XIII,450-455.
15. Hoogendoorn, R.,Hoogendoorn, S.,Brookhuis, K.,Daamen, W.(2011).Adaptation Longitudinal Driving Behavior, Mental Workload, and Psycho-Spacing Models in Fog.Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2249,20-28.
16. Iida, S.,Yukawa, M.,Yonezawa, H.,Yamamoto, N.,Furusawa, A.(2012).Experimental Demonstration of Coherent Feedback Control on Optical Field Squeezing.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,57(8),2045-2050.
17. Jacoby, J.(2002).Stimulus-Organism-Response Reconsidered: An Evolutionary Step in Modeling (Consumer) Behavior.Journal of Consumer Psychology,12(1),51-57.
18. Knipling, R. R.,Wang, J. S.,Yin, H. M.(1993).,Washington, DC, USA:National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
19. Lee, D. N.(1980).The Optic Flow Field: The Foundation of Vision.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,290,169-179.
20. Malhotra, N. K.(2005).Attitude and Affect: New Frontiers of Research in the 21st Century.Journal of Business Research,58,477-482.
21. Mehmood, A.,Easa, S. M.(2009).Modeling Reaction Time in Car-Following Behaviour Based on Human Factors.International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences,5(2),93-101.
22. Mitra, S.,Mukhopadhyay, S.(2013).An Analytical Investigation on the Interactions between a Squeezed and a Coherent Optical Signal.Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics,124(20),4586-4589.
23. Miura, T.(1987).Behavior Oriented Vision: Functional Field of View and Processing Resources.Eye Movements: From Physiology To Cognition,Amsterdam:
24. Mouzé-Amady, M.,Raufaste, E.,Prade, H.,Meyer, J. P.(2013).Fuzzy-TLX: Using Fuzzy Integrals for Evaluating Human Mental Workload with NASA-Task Load Index in Laboratory and Field Studies.Ergonomics,56(5),752-763.
25. Mueller, A. S.,Trick, L. M.(2012).Driving in Fog: The Effects of Driving Experience and Visibility on Speed Compensation and Hazard Avoidance.Accident Analysis and Prevention,48(3),472-479.
26. Ni, R.,Bian, Z.,Guindon, A.,Andersen, G. J.(2012).Aging and the Detection of Imminent Collisions under Simulated Fog Conditions.Accident Analysis and Prevention,49,525-531.
27. Öz, B.,Özkan, T.,Lajunen, T.(2010).Professional and Non-Professional Drivers' Stress Reactions and Risky Driving.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,13(1),32-40.
28. Pretto, P.,Bresciani, J. P.,Rainer, G.,Bülthoff, H. H.(2012).Foggy Perception Slows Us Down.eLife,1,1-12.
29. Robinson, G. H.,Erickson, D. J.,Thurston, G. L.,Clark, R. L.(1972).Visual Search by Automobile Drivers.Human Factors,14(4),315-323.
30. Sheu, J. B.(2013).Characterization of Driver Behavior during Car Following Using Quantum Optical Flow Theory.Transportmetrica Part A,9(3),269-298.
31. Sheu, J. B.(2008).A Quantum Mechanics-Based Approach to Model Incident-Induced Dynamic Driver Behavior.Physica D,,237,1800-1814.
32. Sheu, J. B.,Wu, H. J.(2011).Uncertainties of Perceived Relative Speed and Reaction Time in Car Following: A Quantum Optical Flow Perspective.The 16th International Conference of Hong Kong Society Transportation Studies,Hong Kong:
33. Sheu, J. B.,Wu, H. J.(2015).Driver Perception Uncertainty in Perceived Relative Speed and Reaction Time in Car Following-A Quantum Optical Flow Perspective.Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,80,257-274.
34. Tan, A.,Brewer, P.,Liesch, P. W.(2007).Before the First Export Decision: Internationalisation Readiness in the Pre-Export Phase.International Business Review,16(3),294-309.
35. Tenenbaum, G.,Connolly, C. T.(2008).Attention Allocation under Varied Workload and Effort Perception in Rowers.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,9(5),704-717.
36. Trick, L. M.,Toxopeus, R.,Wilson, D.(2010).The Effects of Visibility Conditions, Traffic Density, and Navigational Challenge on Speed Compensation and Driving Performance in Older Adults.Accident Analysis and Prevention,42(6),1661-1671.
37. Yan, X.,Li, X.,Liu, Y.,Zhao, J.(2014).Effects of Foggy Conditions on Drivers' Speed Control Behaviors at Different Risk Levels.Safety Science,68,275-287.
38. Young, M. S.,Stanton, N. A.(2002).Malleable Attentional Resources Theory: A New Explanation for the Effects of Mental Underload on Performance.Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,44(3),365-375.
39. 王嘉宇、李泽州、张家伟、涂辉招(2015)。高速公路平直路段雾霾天气下的IDM 跟驰模型分析。交通運輸研究，2015(1)，86-91。
40. 涂辉招、李振飞、孙立军(2015)。驾驶模拟器运动系统对自由驾驶行为的影响分析。同濟大學學報：自然科學版，43(11)，1696-1702。
41. 張開國、葉祖宏、吳熙仁、許鉅秉、黃臣鴻、廖晟傑(2013)。應用駕駛模擬器與光流理論於道路駕駛者對前車相對速度感知之標準差與反應時間標準差關聯性之初探。運輸研究專輯
42. 陳彥承(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中央大學機械工程學研究所。

1. 謝宗穎,鄭又嘉,陳柏華,許聿廷,張仲宇,何語萱(2022)。人工智慧於交通安全應用。土木水利，49(1)，40-48。