题名

EXPLORING CONSUMER REASONING IN USAGE INTENTION FOR ELECTRIC SCOOTER SHARING

并列篇名

消費者對電動機車共享使用意圖之推理探究

作者

劉易(Timo Eccarius)；盧宗成(Chung-Cheng Lu)

关键词

Powered two-wheelers ； Electric scooter sharing ； Reasons for and against ； Qualitative content analysis ； Exploratory factor analysis ； 動力兩輪車 ； 電動機車共享 ； 支持和反對理由 ； 質性內容分析 ； 探索性因素分析

期刊名称

運輸計劃季刊

卷期/出版年月

47卷4期（2018 / 12 / 30）

页次

271 - 295

内容语文

英文
中文摘要

In recent years, sharing-schemes for electric scooters have been established globally, also in Taiwan. However, hardly any studies have furthered the understanding of electric scooter sharing adoption among consumers. This study explores the reasons among potential users for and against using electric scooter sharing, their usage intentions, potential trip purposes and mode shifts, as well as respondents' experience with and attitudes toward shared use mobility and electric vehicles. A survey with open-ended questions was undertaken to explore the reasons for and against among consumers to use electric scooter sharing. We employ qualitative and quantitative methods to analyze data collected among university students in Taiwan. Our results encourage investigating electric scooter sharing usage intentions across countries or cultures globally in different contexts. Consumers’ reasons for and against using electric scooter sharing display different structures and emphasis, and should be investigated in distinction. Findings on trip modes point out desirable and undesirable potential consequences of electric scooter sharing use, depending on the cultural context. The results provide transportation researchers, planners and policy makers with a baseline for further investigating the potential impact of electric scooter sharing. Quantitative surveys can be developed based on the findings of this study.
英文摘要

近年來，電動機車共享機制在全世界普遍推廣，臺灣也不例外，然而，過去研究甚少深入探討消費者對於電動機車共享之使用意圖。本研究探討潛在使用者支持和反對使用電動機車共享的理由、使用意圖、潛在旅次目的和運具轉移情形，以及受訪者對行動共享和電動車輛的經驗和態度。本研究藉由開放式問卷調查探討消費者使用電動機車共享的支持和反對理由，採用質性和量化方法分析所收集在台灣就讀大學的本國生與外籍生的問卷資料。研究結果支持後續探討在不同情境下跨國與不同文化背景消費者之電動機車共享使用意圖。消費者對於電動機車共享使用的支持與反對原因具有不同的結構和重點，應該進行區別調查。旅次運具使用調查發現使用電動機車共享的可能潛在後果隨文化背景不同。本研究結果為運輸研究人員，規劃人員和決策者提供了進一步調查電動機車共享潛在影響的基礎，後續也可以根據本研究的結果發展量化研究。
主题分类 工程學 > 交通運輸工程
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. (2014).Encouraging Sustainable Behavior: Psychology and the Environment.Routledge.
  2. Ajzen, I.(1991).Theory of Planned Behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50,179-211.
  3. Albarracin, D.(Ed.),Johnson, B. T.(Ed.),Zanna, Mark P.(Ed.)(2005).The Handbook of Attitudes.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Bagozzi, R. P.,Bergami, M.,Leone, L.(2003).Hierarchical Representation of Motives in Goal Setting.Journal of Applied Psychology,88,915.
  5. Bardhi, F.,Eckhardt, G. M.(2012).Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing.Journal of Consumer Research,39,881-898.
  6. Barr, S.(2004).Are We All Environmentalists Now? Rhetoric and Reality in Environmental Action.Geoforum,35,231-249.
  7. Blake, J.(1999).Overcoming the 'Value-Action Gap' in Environmental Policy: Tensions between National Policy and Local Experience.Local Environment,4,257-278.
  8. Coffman, M.,Bernstein, P.,Wee, S.(2017).Electric Vehicles Revisited: A Review of Factors that Affect Adoption.Transport Reviews,37,79-93.
  9. Degele, J.,Gorr, A.,Haas, K.,Kormann, D.,Krauss, S.,Lipinski, P.,Tenbih, M.,Koppenhoefer, C.,Fauser, J.,Hertweck, D.(2018).Identifying E-Scooter Sharing Customer Segments Using Clustering.2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)
  10. Del Duce, A.(2011).Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Bicycles.Eurobike 2011 Conference
  11. Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) of Executive Yuan, ROC, “National Statistics, Republic of China (Taiwan)”, Table 15. Higher Education, 2016.
  12. Efthymiou, D.,Antoniou, C.,Waddell, P.(2013).Factors Affecting the Adoption of Vehicle Sharing Systems by Young Drivers.Transport Policy,29,64-73.
  13. Franke, T.,Krems, J. F.(2013).Interacting with Limited Mobility Resources: Psychological Range Levels in Electric Vehicle Use.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,48,109-122.
  14. Galotti, K. M.(1989).Approaches to Studying Formal and Everyday Reasoning.Psychological Bulletin,105,331.
  15. Gigerenzer, G.,Goldstein, D. G.(1996).Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality.Psychological Review,103,650.
  16. Gilbert, R.,Perl, A.(2010).Transport Revolutions: Moving People and Freight without Oil.Gabriola Island, BC Canada:New Society.
  17. Gota, S.(2018).Two-and-Three-Wheelers: A Policy Guide to Sustainable Mobility Solutions for Motorcycles.Eschborn, Germany:Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.
  18. Greve, W.(2001).Traps and Gaps in Action Explanation: Theoretical Problems of a Psychology of Human Action.Psychological Review,108,435-451.
  19. Guerra, E.(2017).Electric Vehicles, Air Pollution, and the Motorcycle City: A Stated Preference Survey of Consumers' Willingness to Adopt Electric Motorcycles in Solo, Indonesia.Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,68,52-64.
  20. Guest, G.,Bunce, A.,Johnson, L.(2006).How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.Field Methods,18,59-82.
  21. Haefeli, U.,Matti, D.,Schreyer, C.,Maibach, M.(2006).Final Report, Swiss Federal Office for EnergyFinal Report, Swiss Federal Office for Energy,未出版
  22. Howe, E.(2018).,InnoZ - Innovation Centre for Mobility and Societal Change.
  23. Jensen, A. F.,Cherchi, E.,Mabit, S. L.(2013).On the Stability of Preferences and Attitudes before and after Experiencing an Electric Vehicle.Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,25,24-32.
  24. Katz, D.(1960).The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes.Public Opinion Quarterly,24,163-204.
  25. Khattak, A.,Wang, X.,Son, S.,Agnello, P.(2011).Travel by University Students in Virginia: Is This Travel Different from Travel by the General Population?.Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2255(1),137-145.
  26. Kim, D.,Ko, J.,Park, Y.(2015).Factors Affecting Electric Vehicle Sharing Program Participants' Attitudes about Car Ownership and Program Participation.Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,36,96-106.
  27. Kim, J.,Schmöcker, J. D.,Fujii, S.(2016).Exploring the Relationship between Undergraduate Education and Sustainable Transport Attitudes.International Journal of Sustainable Transportation,10,385-392.
  28. Klöckner, C. A.,Friedrichsmeier, T.(2011).A Multi-Level Approach to Travel Mode Choice- How Person Characteristics and Situation Specific Aspects Determine Car Use in a Student Sample.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,14,261-277.
  29. Kollmuss, A.,Agyeman, J.(2002).Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior?.Environmental Education Research,8,239-260.
  30. Lange, I.,Moro, M.,Traynor, L.(2014).Green Hypocrisy: Environmental Attitudes and Residential Space Heating Expenditure.Ecological Economics,107,76-83.
  31. Leung, A.,Burke, M.,Perl, A.,Cui, J.(2017).The Peak Oil and Oil Vulnerability Discourse in Urban Transport Policy: A Comparative Discourse Analysis of Hong Kong and Brisbane.Transport Policy,65,5-18.
  32. Limanond, T.,Butsingkorn, T.,Chermkhunthod, C.(2011).Travel Behavior of University Students Who Live on Campus: A Case Study of a Rural University in Asia.Transport Policy,18,163-171.
  33. Litman, T.(2000).Evaluating Carsharing Benefits.Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board,1702(1),31-35.
  34. Litman, T.(2002).Evaluating Transportation Equity.World Transport Policy & Practice,8,50-65.
  35. Martin, E. W.,Shaheen, S. A.(2014).Evaluating Public Transit Modal Shift Dynamics in Response to Bikesharing: A Tale of Two U.S. Cities.Journal of Transport Geography,41,315-324.
  36. Martin, E.,Shaheen, S.(2011).The Impact of Carsharing on Public Transit and Non-Motorized Travel: An Exploration of North American Carsharing Survey Data.Energies,4,2094-2114.
  37. Mayring, P.(2014).Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution.Klagenfurt.
  38. Miles, M. B.,Huberman, A. M.,Huberman, M. A.,Huberman, M.(1994).Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook.Sage Publications.
  39. Ministry of Education, ROC, “2018 Education Statistical Indicators”, https://english.moe.gov.tw/cp-27-14504-9E20A-1.html, 2018.
  40. Morse, J.,Niehaus, L.(2009).Principles and Procedures of Mixed Methods Design.Walnut Creek, CA:Left Coast Press.
  41. Newman, P. W. G.,Kenworthy, J. R.(1989).Gasoline Consumption and Cities: A Comparison of U.S. Cities with a Global Survey.Journal of the American Planning Association,55,24-37.
  42. Nickerson, R. S.(2002).Psychology and Environmental Change.Psychology Press.
  43. OECD/IEA(2017).Global EV Outlook 2017.
  44. Ornetzeder, M.,Hertwich, E. G.,Hubacek, K.,Korytarova, K.,Haas, W.(2008).The Environmental Effect of Car-Free Housing: A Case in Vienna.Ecological Economics,65,516-530.
  45. Padgett, D. K.(2016).Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research.Sage Publications.
  46. Patton, M. Q.(2002).Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods.Sage Publications.
  47. Platt, S. M.,Haddad, I. E.,Pieber, S. M.,Huang, R. J.,Zardini, A. A.,Clairotte, M.,Suarez-Bertoa, R.,Barmet, P.,Pfaffenberger, L.,Wolf, R.(2014).Two-Stroke Scooters Are a Dominant Source of Air Pollution in Many Cities.Nature Communications,5
  48. Prettenthaler, F. E.,Steininger, K. W.(1999).From Ownership to Service Use Lifestyle: The Potential of Car Sharing.Ecological Economics,28,443-453.
  49. Rogers, E. M.(2003).Diffusion of Innovations.Free Press:New York.
  50. Rotaris, L.,Danielis, R.(2014).The Impact of Transportation Demand Management Policies on Commuting to College Facilities: A Case Study at the University of Trieste, Italy.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,67,127-140.
  51. Ryan, R. M.,Connell, J. P.(1989).Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining Reasons for Acting in Two Domains.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57,749-761.
  52. Schaefers, T.(2013).Exploring Carsharing Usage Motives: A Hierarchical Means-End Chain Analysis.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,47,69-77.
  53. Shaheen, S. A.,Chan, N. D.,Micheaux, H.(2015).One-Way Carsharing's Evolution and Operator Perspectives from the Americas.Transportation,42,519-536.
  54. Shaheen, S. A.,Cohen, A. P.(2013).Carsharing and Personal Vehicle Services: Worldwide Market Developments and Emerging Trends.International Journal of Sustainable Transportation,7,5-34.
  55. Shaheen, S. A.,Mallery, M. A.,Kingsley, K. J.(2012).Personal Vehicle Sharing Services in North America.Research in Transportation Business & Management,3,71-81.
  56. Shaheen, S.,Cohen, A.(2007).Growth in Worldwide Carsharing: An International Comparison.Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board,1992,81-89.
  57. Shaheen, S.,Martin, E.,Cohen, A.(2013).Public Bikesharing and Modal Shift Behavior: A Comparative Study of Early Bikesharing Systems in North America.International Journal of Transportation,1,35-54.
  58. Shannon, T.,Giles-Corti, B.,Pikora, T.,Bulsara, M.,Shilton, T.,Bull, F.(2006).Active Commuting in a University Setting: Assessing Commuting Habits and Potential for Modal Change.Transport Policy,13,240-253.
  59. Snyder, M.(1992).Motivational Foundations of Behavioral Confirmation.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,25,67-114.
  60. Steininger, K.,Vogl, C.,Zettl, R.(1996).Car-Sharing Organizations: The Size of the Market Segment and Revealed Change in Mobility Behavior.Transport Policy,3,177-185.
  61. Tsai, T. H.(2017).Heterogeneous Analysis of Transportation Mode Choice at a Green Tourist Destination.Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies,12,18.
  62. Venkatesh, V.,Bala, H.(2008).Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions.Decision Sciences,39,273-315.
  63. Venkatesh, V.,Thong, J. Y. L.,Xu, X.(2016).Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead.Journal of the Association for Information Systems,17,328-376.
  64. Westaby, J. D.(2005).Comparing Attribute Importance and Reason Methods for Understanding Behavior: An Application to Internet Job Searching.Applied Psychology,54,568-583.
  65. Westaby, J. D.(2005).Behavioral Reasoning Theory: Identifying New Linkages Underlying Intentions and Behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,98,97-120.
  66. Westaby, J. D.,Fishbein, M.(1996).Factors Underlying Behavioral Choice: Testing a New Reasons Theory Approach1.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,26,1307-1323.
  67. Whalen, K. E.,Páez, A.,Carrasco, J. A.(2013).Mode Choice of University Students Commuting to School and the Role of Active Travel.Journal of Transport Geography,31,132-142.
  68. WHO(2015).WHO Global Status Report on Road Safety 2015.
  69. WHO(2013).WHO Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013.
  70. Winter, K.,Cats, O.,Martens, K.,van Arem, B.(2017).A Stated-Choice Experiment on Mode Choice in an Era of Free-Floating Carsharing and Shared Autonomous Vehicles.Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting
  71. Zhou, J.(2012).Sustainable Commute in a Car-Dominant City: Factors Affecting Alternative Mode Choices among University Students.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,46,1013-1029.
被引用次数
  1. 謝旭昇,陳葦丰(2022)。利己或者利他？整合品牌利益動機與利環境動機探討電動機車使用行為意圖。都市與計劃，49(4)，421-462。
  2. (2024)。以延伸型整合性科技接受模式探討共享機車使用意圖之影響因素及行為歷程。管理與系統，31(2)，275-305。
print cancel