考量彈性到達時段與成本差異下船席等候定價模式之研究

A STUDY ON THE BERTH QUEUING PRICING MODEL UNDER THE CONDITION OF FLEXIBLE ARRIVAL TIME AND COST DIFFERENCE

孫珮元(Pey-Yuan Sun)；賴禎秀(Chen-Hsiu Laih)

船席等候定價 ； 均衡成本 ； 零等候彈性收費 ； 階梯式彈性收費 ； Berth queuing pricing model ； Equilibrium cost ； Optimal time-varying flexible toll ； Step flexible toll

運輸計劃季刊

49卷1期（2020 / 03 / 30）

67 - 91

繁體中文

船席等候定價模式係透過以價制量的觀點，以收費來分散船舶密集的抵達狀態，進而舒緩船舶等候現象。在既有文獻之模式中，假設船舶之排隊等候時間成本均相同，且船舶報到時間為精準時刻。但該假設與海運實務現況下船舶因不同性質其排隊等候時間成本有所差異，以及船舶報到時間存在緩衝彈性時段有所不同。有鑑於此，本研究考量不同性質船舶對應不同的排隊等候時間成本，以及將船舶的固定報到時刻放寬為彈性到達時段下，重新建構船席等候定價模式。本模式首先計算出收費實施前之船舶均衡成本，據此推導出零等候彈性收費架構與階梯式彈性收費架構，最後以高雄港相關統計資料編寫程式進行數值分析，以模擬上述收費架構實施後之排隊等候消除效果。

The berth queuing pricing model is used to disperse the ship's over-intensive arrival status, and consequently relieve the ship queuing phenomenon. In the existing model, the value of the queuing time cost of the ship is the same, and the ship registration time requirement is the precise time spot. However, in the maritime practice status, the queuing time cost of the ship varies due to different types of properties, and the ship registration time also has a buffer flexible period. In view of this, this study considers the difference in the queuing time cost of ships, and relaxes the ship registration time to be a time period to reconstruct the berth queuing pricing model. This improved model first calculates the equilibrium cost of the ship before implementing the toll, then we can derive the optimal time-varying flexible toll scheme and step flexible toll scheme. Finally, using the relevant statistics of Kaohsiung Port to write a program for a numerical analysis of the effects of the above toll schemes on ship queuing reduction.

1. 賴禎秀(2001)。階梯式擁擠收費體制下最佳收費階段數之研究。運輸計劃季刊，30(2)，253-274。
   連結：
2. Arnott, R.,De Palma, A.,Lindsey, R.(1990).Economics of a Bottleneck.Journal of Urban Economics,27(1),111-130.
3. Laih, C. H.(2004).Effects of the Optimal Step Toll Scheme on Equilibrium Commuter Behaviour.Applied Economics,36(1),59-81.
4. Laih, C. H.(1994).Queueing at a Bottleneck with Single and Multi-Step Tolls.Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice,28(3),197-208.
5. Laih, C. H.,Chen, K. Y.(2009).Economics on the Optimal Port Queuing Pricing to Bulk Ships.Applied Economics,41,2817-2825.
6. Laih, C. H.,Chen, K. Y.(2008).Economics on the Optimal N-Step Toll Scheme for a Queuing Port.Applied Economics,40,209-228.
7. Laih, C. H.,Lin, B.,Chen, K. Y.(2007).Effects of the Optimal Port Queuing Pricing on Arrival Decisions for Container Ships.Applied Economics,39,1855-1865.
8. Laih, C. H.,Sun, P. Y.(2013).Effects of the Optimal N-Step Tolls on Bulk Vessels Queuing for Multiple Berths of a Busy Port.Transport Policy,28,42-50.
9. Laih, C. H.,Sun, P. Y.(2014).The Optimal Toll Scheme for Ships Queuing at the Entrance of Panama Canal.Maritime Economics and Logistics,16,20-32.
10. Laih, C. H.,Tsai, Y. C.,Chen, Z. B.(2015).Optimal Non-Queuing Pricing for the Suez Canal.Maritime Economics and Logistics,17,359-370.
11. Lindsey, C. R.,Van den Berg, V. A.,Verhoef, E. T.(2012).Step Tolling with Bottleneck Queuing Congestion.Journal of Urban Economics,72(1),46-59.
12. Sun, P. Y.,Laih, C. H.,Chen, C. L.(2016).Modeling the Optimal Pricing for Nonscheduled Trampers Queuing for Shared-Use Berths at a Busy Port.International Journal of Transport Economics,43(3),361-378.
13. Vickrey, W. S.(1969).Congestion Theory and Transport Investment.American Economic Review,59(2),251-260.
14. Vincent, A. C.,van den Berg, V. A. C.(2014).Coarse Tolling with Heterogeneous Preferences.Transportation Research-Part B,64(1),1-23.
15. 吳瑾麟(2013)。國立臺灣海洋大學商船學系。
16. 林晏如(2012)。國立臺灣海洋大學商船學系。
17. 謝佳璇(2015)。國立臺灣海洋大學商船學系。