题名

試乘民眾對於自動駕駛小巴的選擇行為與偏好分析－以國立故宮博物院南部院區為例

并列篇名

ANALYSIS OF PASSENGERS' CHOICE BEHAVIOR AND PREFERENCES FOR SELF-DRIVING SHUTTLE BUS-A CASE STUDY OF SOUTHERN BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL PALACE MUSEUM

作者

杜建宏(Chien-Hung Tu)；石豐宇(Feng-Yeu Shyr)；蘇祥愷(Hsiang-Kai Su)

关键词

自動駕駛小巴 ； 敘述性偏好 ； 羅吉特模式 ； 運具選擇 ； Self-Driving Shuttle Bus ； Stated Preference ； Logit Model ； Mode Choice

期刊名称

運輸計劃季刊

卷期/出版年月

52卷1期（2023 / 03 / 30）

页次

51 - 78

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

近年來世界各國致力於發展自動駕駛技術，目前自動駕駛小巴除歐美等國已於不同類型場域進行測試外，我國亦於部份封閉場域舉辦短期的試乘活動，然而由於發展初期，目前有關國人對於自動駕駛小巴態度的瞭解較少，因此本研究欲從需求面出發，藉由國立故宮博物院南部院區舉辦的試乘活動，探討自動駕駛小巴試乘民眾之需求偏好。本研究以敘述性偏好法，模擬未來自動駕駛小巴提供故宮南院園區內的接駁服務，並運用多項羅吉特模式及巢氏羅吉特模式進行參數校估，建立故宮南院園區接駁之運具選擇模型。研究結果顯示，路程時間和旅行成本對於試乘民眾的運具選擇具有顯著負向之影響，若未來自動駕駛小巴票價過高將導致其市占率大幅下滑。
英文摘要

Self-driving or autonomous vehicles are being developed throughout the world. Self-driving shuttle buses have been tested in different fields in Europe and the United States. Taiwan has also conducted brief test-ride activities in closed circuits. Taiwanese attitudes toward self-driving shuttle buses are unknown, and this study investigated passenger preferences regarding a self-driving shuttle bus during a test-ride activity at the Southern Branch of the National Palace Museum. The study used stated preference to simulate a self-driving shuttle bus service in the park and then used multinomial logit model and nested logit model to calibrate the parameters and establish the mode choice model. The results indicate that travel time and cost have a significant impact on mode choice. If the fare of a self-driving shuttle bus is too high, the market share of the bus will sharply decline.
主题分类 工程學 > 交通運輸工程
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 李恒綺,楊大輝,楊明德,巫妮蓉(2016)。公共腳踏車使用者特性及偏好分析－以高雄市C-Bike 為例。運輸計劃季刊，45(4)，331-356。
    連結：
  2. 沈怡如(2018)。智慧交通與車聯網發展趨勢。機械工業雜誌，418，70-75。
    連結：
  3. 陳學台,鍾惠存,李慧(2018)。臺北市智慧運輸之發展。土木水利，45(2)，55-59。
    連結：
  4. 7Starlake, 7Starlake_Press_ kit, https://7starlake.com/Market/EZ10/download, 擷取日期：2023 年 3 月。
  5. Alessandrini, A.,Mercier-Handisyde, P.(2016).CityMobil2 Final Publication: “Experience and Recommendations”.Brussels:European Commission.
  6. Alessandrini, A.,Site, P. D.,Gatta, V.,Marcucci, E.,Zhang, Q.(2016).Investigating Users' Attitudes Towards Conventional and Automated Buses in Twelve European Cities.International Journal of Transport Economics,43(4),413-436.
  7. Boersma, R.,van Arem, B.,Rieck, F.(2018).Application of Driverless Electric Automated Shuttles for Public Transport in Villages: The Case of Appelscha.World Electric Vehicle Journal,9(1)
  8. Bos, P.(2017).Nijmegen,Radboud University.
  9. Chen, C. F.(2019).Factors Affecting the Decision to Use Autonomous Shuttle Services: Evidence from a Scooter-Dominant Urban Context.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,67,195-204.
  10. Darwin Waterfront Corporation. & Northern Territory Government, “2017 Northern Territory Driverless Bus Trial Evaluation Summary”, https://www.aph.gov.au/ DocumentStore.ashx?id=998e8062-8eb9-491f-a39f-a3c26c4e032d&subId=673056, 擷取日期：2023 年 3 月。
  11. Dong, X.,DiScenna, M.,Guerra, E.(2019).Transit User Perceptions of Driverless Buses.Transportation,46,35-50.
  12. Garcia, A. D., “Denver’s Amazon Bid Included this Futuristic, Driverless Shuttle”, https://denverite.com/2017/11/14/denver-amazon-bid-driverless-shuttle/，2017/11/14。
  13. Guo, J.,Susilo, Y.,Antoniou, C.,Pernestål, A.(2021).When and Why do People Choose Automated Buses Over Conventional Buses? Results of a Context-Dependent Stated Choice Experiment.Sustainable Cities and Society,69
  14. Hausman, J.,McFadden, D.(1984).Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model.Econometrica,52(5),1219-1240.
  15. Herrenkind, B.,Brendel, A. B.,Nastjuk, I.,Greve, M.,Kolbe, L. M.(2019).Investigating end-User Acceptance of Autonomous Electric Buses to Accelerate Diffusion.Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,74,255-276.
  16. Madigan, R.,Louw, T.,Dziennus, M.,Graindorge, T.,Ortega, E.,Graindorge, M.,Merat, N.(2016).Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): An Adaptation of the UTAUT Model.Transportation Research Procedia,14,2217-2226.
  17. McFadden, D.(1978).Modeling the Choice of Residential Location.Transportation Research Record,672,72-77.
  18. Mouratidis, K.,Serrano, V. C.(2021).Autonomous Buses: Intentions to Use, Passenger Experiences, and Suggestions for Improvement.Transportation research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,76,321-335.
  19. Nesheli, M. M.,Li, L.,Palm, M.,Shalaby, A.(2021).Driverless Shuttle Pilots: Lessons for Automated Transit Technology Deployment.Case Studies on Transport Policy,9(2),723-742.
  20. Noebel, A., “California’s First Driverless Bus Hits the Road in San Ramon”, https://www.bishopranch.com/californias-first-driverless-bus-hits-the-road-in-san-ramon/, 2018/3/6。
  21. Nordhoff, S.,de Winter, J.,Madigan, R.,Merat, N.,van Arem, B.,Happee, R.(2018).User Acceptance of Automated Shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: A Questionnaire Study.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,58,843-854.
  22. Portouli, E.,Karaseitanidis, G.,Lytrivis, P.,Amditis, A.,Raptis, O.,Karaberi, C.(2017).Public Attitudes Towards Autonomous Mini Buses Operating in Real Conditions in a Hellenic City.IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Vol. IV
  23. Roche-Cerasi, I.(2019).Public Acceptance of Driverless Shuttles in Norway.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,66,162-183.
  24. Salonen, A. O.(2018).Passenger's Subjective Traffic Safety, In-Vehicle Security and Emergency Management in the Driverless Shuttle Bus in Finland.Transport Policy,61,106-110.
  25. Schoettle, B.,Sivak, M.(2014).,Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.:The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
  26. Schoettle, B.,Sivak, M.(2015).,Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.:The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
  27. The Boston Consulting Group(2015).Self-Driving Vehicles in an Urban Context.World Economic Forum
  28. United Nations(2019).Revision of World Urbanization Prospects.New York:
  29. 巴士之訊，「西九文化區引入自動巴士」，https://www.busfocus.info/public-transport/ west-kowloon-cultural-district-to-introduce-autonomous-buses/，2017/7/7。
  30. 交通部統計處，自用小客車使用狀況調查報告，民國 108 年 10 月。
  31. 交通部統計處，從性別看交通運具使用情形，民國 104 年。
  32. 交通部統計處，109 年民眾日常使用運具狀況調查摘要分析，民國 110 年 4 月。
  33. 李永展(2018)。智慧城市發展之芻議。經濟前瞻，176，48-51。
  34. 林信亨(2017)。全球智慧城市發展現況與趨勢。電工通訊季刊，2017(2)，42-49。
  35. 林欽榮(2017)。城市治理與智慧城市產業驅動臺北策略。國土及公共治理季刊，5(4)，82-91。
  36. 林露茵,金陽,Lipson, H.,Kurman, M.(2017).無人駕駛.上海:文匯出版社.
  37. 柴占祥,聶天心,Becker, J.(2017).自動駕駛改變未來.北京:機械工業出版社.
  38. 高雄市政府交通局，106 年度高雄市自動駕駛電動巴士系統試運行計畫委託服務案期末報告書，民國 107 年。
  39. 劉少山,唐潔,吳雙,李力耘(2018).無人駕駛真的來了：第一本從技術面深入的實作書.臺北:佳魁數位.
print cancel