國中實施審議式教學學習成效之初探研究

A Study of the Effect of the Application of Deliberative Teaching in Junior High Schools

10.6249/SE.2012.63.2.08

胡淑華(Shu-Hua Hu)

審議式教學 ； 互為主體 ； 民主教育 ； deliberative teaching ； inter-subjectivity ； democratic education

中等教育

63卷2期（2012 / 06 / 01）

143 - 156

繁體中文

審議民主觀已從政治領域轉向教育層面之應用，目的在於開拓學生民主參與的能力。基此，如何將審議民主理論轉化於課程教學質踐即成關鍵。本研究旨在透過審議式教學瞭解學生學習成效及推動問題。本研究以國中八年級學生為研究對象，進行五週的課程教學，以質性研究方式進行資料蒐集分析，包括：學生綜合回饋表、訪談與教學省思札記等，藉以了解學生學習表現與教學實施的過程。本研究結論歸納如下：（一）學生自述審議式教學對其有助於提昇理性慎思與溝通能力，並學會尊重與欣賞，不同意見；（二）透過師生互為主體的審議式教學，提供民主教育創新教學策略。

Adopt the concept of deliberative democracy from political domain to educational one aims to promote students' ability to participate in democracy. Basing on above, how to transform the theory of deliberative democracy into practice on teaching is an essential factor. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of deliberative teaching on students' learning effects and obstacles while implementing. The subjects were consisted of 28 eighth graders. Students were received a five-week instruction with the deliberative teaching concerning civic education. Qualitative data including forms of students' feedback, interviews and the instructor's teaching journals were collected for data analyses. Results indicated that deliberative teaching is helpful to (1) enhance students' ability of rational thinking, communicating and respecting different viewpoints; (2) provide teachers an innovative teaching strategy about democratic education through deliberative teaching of inter-subjectivity between teachers and students.

1. 林火旺(2005)。審議民主與公民養成。國立臺灣大學哲學論評，29，99-143。
   連結：
2. 林純雯(2010)。審議式公民教育的圖像：從教師審議素養之探究論起。人文社會科學研究，4，132-160。
   連結：
3. 范雲(2010)。說故事與民主討論─一個公民社會內部族群對話論壇的分析。臺灣民主季刊，7，65-105。
   連結：
4. 董秀蘭(2006)。臺灣北部三縣市八年級學生社會學習領域課堂討論經驗與影響因素之調查。公民訓育學報，18，65-89。
   連結：
5. Connolly, B.,Smith, M. W.(2002).Teachers and students talk about : Class discussion and the way it should be.Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy,46(1),16-26.
6. Englund, T.(2006).Deliberative communication: a pragmatist proposal.Journal of Curriculum Studies,38(5),503-520.
7. Englund, T.(2000).Rethinking democracy and education-towards an education of deliberative citizens.Journal of Curriculum Studies,32(2),305-313.
8. Enslin, P.,Pendlebury, S.,Tjiattas, M.(2001).Deliberative democracy, diversity and the challenges of citizenship education.Journal of Philosophy of Education,35,115-130.
9. Fonseca, C.,Bujanda, M. E.(2011).Promoting children's capacities for active and deliberative citizenship with digital technologies: The CADE Project in Costa Rica.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,633(1),243-262.
10. Gastil, J.,Dillard, J. P.(1999).The aims, methods, and effects of deliberative civic education through the National Issues Forums.Communication Education,48,179-182.
11. Gutmann, A.,Thompson, D.(1996).Democracy and disagreement.London:Harvard University Press.
12. Howe, K.,Ashcraft, C.(2005).Deliberative democratic evaluation: Successes and limitations of an evaluation of school choice.Teachers College Record,107(10),2274-2297.
13. Lefrançois, D.,Éthier, M.-A.(2010).Translating the ideal of deliberative democracy into democratic education: Pure utopia?.Educational Philosophy and Theory,42(3),271-292.
14. McCoy, M. L.,Scully, P. L.(2002).Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need?.National Civic Review,91(2),117-135.
15. Murphy, T. A.(2004).Deliberative civic education and civil society: A consideration of ideals and actualities in democracy and communication education.Communication Education,53,74-91.
16. Nelson, J.,Lott, L.,Glenn, H.(2000).Positive discipline in the classroom.New York:Three Rivers Press.
17. Peterson, A.(2009).Civic republicanism and contestatory deliberation: Framing pupil discourse within citizenship education.British Journal of Educational Studies,57,55-69.
18. Reich, W.(2007).Deliberative democracy in the classroom: A sociological view.Educational Theory,57(2),187-197.
19. Rossi, J. A.(1995).In-depth study in an issues-oriented social studies classroom.Theory and research in Social Education,23(2),88-120.
20. Roth, K.(2003).Freedom of choice, community and deliberation.Journal of Philosophy of Education,37(3),393-413.
21. Roth, K.(2006).Deliberation in national and post-national education.Journal of Curriculum Studies,38(5),569-589.
22. Soltis, J.(1990).A critical theory of education.New York:Teachers College Press.
23. Weithman, P.(2005).Deliberative character.The journal of political philosophy,13(3),263-283.
24. 林火旺(2008)。審議式民主在公民養成中的重要意義。「審議式民主與公民養成研討會」論文集，臺北市:
25. 陳素秋(2005)。哈伯馬斯之審議式民主觀對於公民教育的啟發。人文及社會學科教學通訊，15，6-21。
26. 劉美慧、董秀蘭(2009)。我國公民教育革新之反思─國際公民教育與素養調查計畫之研究與啟示。教育資料與研究，87，145-162。
27. 潘文福(2010)。建構互為主體性的教室觀察指標─詮釋的觀點。教育資料與研究雙月刊，96，95-116。

1. 周維萱(2018)。以世界咖啡館討論模式提升大專學生公民參與態度及教學成效之研究。教育科學研究期刊，63(3)，37-67。