國高中數學教學專業知能指標

Indicators of Professional Mathematics Teaching Competence at The Secondary School level

10.6249/SE.2012.63.3.03

謝豐瑞(Feng-Jui Hsieh)

數學教學知能 ； 教師專業發展 ； 教學師資培育 ； 數學教學內容知識 ； mathematics teaching competence ； teacher professional development ； mathematics teacher education ； MPCK

中等教育

63卷3期（2012 / 09 / 01）

30 - 47

繁體中文

本研究的主要目的在於發展中學教師數學教學專業知能結構、項目與指標。本研究乃一為期四年的發展性研究，研究方法主要採問卷調查法及焦點團體討論法，樣本包括75位中學數學教師、53位教學師資培育者、全國性隨機抽樣之2,077位國中生及2,437位高中生。本研究發展出一個包含數學教學元素、運算、核點的數學教學專業知能結構，其中共有20個元素，3個運算與3個核點，每一運算作用在一或多個元素上，搭配核點的選擇，可產生許多數學教學知能專業項目，數量龐大無法窮盡，以此結構可做出有系統的數學教學知能項目選擇，可供教師檢定、甄選、評鑑使用。除此，研究結果顯示不論國中或高中，從學生的觀點來看，數學教學最重要的專業指標是要能替學生解惑，而重視公式與性質的推導過程也是另一項重要的指標。

This study is a four-year study that aims at developing the structure, items and indicators of mathematics teaching competence (MTC) in the high school level. A total of 75 secondary school elite mathematics teachers and 53 mathematics teacher educators either participated in focus group sections or be surveyed with questionnaires. A national random sample of 2077 junior high school students and 2437 senior high school students were surveyed. This study develops a structure of MTC which is structured around three objects: element, operation, and kernel. With these, a total of twenty element s of mathematics teaching, three operation s, and three kernels are engaged. Any operation may act on any element with a certain kernel focus, and this process may generate unlimited MTC items. The structure of MTC may properly help classifying, organizing and selecting MTC items in the teacher recruitment, qualification assessment, and evaluation settings. This study also finds that from the student points of views at both junior and senior high school levels, the foremost indicator of MTC is being able to resolve students' doubts. Emphasizing how a formula or rule is derived is another important MTC indicator.

1. 李源順、林褔來、呂玉琴、陳美芳(2008)。小學教師數學教學發展標準之探究：學者的觀點。科學教育學刊，16(6)，627-650。
   連結：
2. 陳英娥、林褔來(2004)。行動研究促進初任數學教師的教學成長。科學教育學刊，12(1)，83-105。
   連結：
3. Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010, July). Interstate teacher assessment and support consortium (InTASC) Model Core Teaching Standards: A Resource for State Dialogue (Draft for Public Comment). Washington, DC: Author..
4. Aichele, D. B.(ed.),Coxford, A. F.(ed.)(1994).Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics: 1994 Year Book.Reston:NCTM.
5. Ball, D. L.,Thames, M. H.,Phelps, G.(2008).Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special?.Journal of Teacher Education,59(5),389-407.
6. Davis, P.,Hersh, R.(1981).The mathematical experience.Boston, MA:Birkhauser.
7. Gattuso, L.,Mailloux, N.(1994).Conceptions about mathematics teaching of preservice elementary and high-school teachers.Proceedings of the 18th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,Lisbon:
8. Grouws, D. A.(ed.)(1992).Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning.New York:Macmillan.
9. Hill, H. C.,Ball, D. L.,Schilling, S. G.(2008).Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge of students.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,39(4),372-400.
10. Hill, H. C.,Schilling, S. G.,Ball, D. L.(2004).Developing measures of teachers' mathematics knowledge for teaching.Elementary School Journal,105(1),11-30.
11. Lin, F. L.(ed.),Coony, T. J.(ed.)(2001).Making sense of mathematics education.Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards(2001).NBPTS early childhood generalist standards: Second edition.Arlington, VA:Author.
13. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000).Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA:Author.
14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1991).Professional standards for teaching mathematics.Reston, VA:Author.
15. Niss, M. A.(2003).Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: the Danish KOM project.3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education,Athen:
16. Schön, D. A.(1983).The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action.USA:Basic Books.
17. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-22.
18. Stepanek, J.(2000).,Portland:Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
19. Stepanek, J.,Jarrett, D.(1997).ERIC Document Reproduction ServiceERIC Document Reproduction Service,Portland:Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
20. Wilson, P. S.,Cooney, T. J.,Stinson, D. W.(2005).What constitutes good mathematics teaching and how it develops: nine high school teachers' perspectives.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,8(2),83-111.
21. 宋玉如(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學數學系。
22. 柳賢(1994)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,高雄市:國立高雄師範大學。
23. 高薰芳(2006)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,新北市:私立淡江大學。
24. 陳昭地、顏啟麟(1991)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
25. 謝豐瑞(2006)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
26. 謝豐瑞(2002)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
27. 謝豐瑞(2008)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。

1. 廖本煌(Pen-Hwang Liau);陳欣民(Hisn-Min Chen)(2023)。中學數學實習師資生教學知能指標之建構：改良式德懷術之應用。教育科學研究期刊。68(1)。73-108。