高中動畫藝術教材選擇之評定標準研究

Assessment Criteria Research about How to Choose Animation for Art Instructional Materials in Senior High Schools

10.6249/SE.2014.65.1.07

謝攸青(Yu-Ching Hsieh)

動畫 ； 藝術教材 ； 評定規準 ； 創造性思維 ； 後現代藝術 ； animation ； art material ； criteria ； creative thinking ； postmodern art

中等教育

65卷1期（2014 / 03 / 01）

112 - 133

繁體中文

在多元媒體科技發達的時代裡，選擇動畫做為培養學生創造性思維的藝術教材，應該可以是藝術教材中的一個重要選項。然而藝術教師運用何種標準來選擇這類教材，亦直接影響學生學習，本研究目的以培養學生創造性思維為核心，發展藝術教師判斷評定動畫藝術教材等級之標準，並設定評定的規準與方向，期能作為高中藝術教師選擇動畫藝術教材之參考。本研究針對高中階段，從動畫藝術教材的媒體表達、美感形式，以及人文內涵三個藝術教學範疇的特質分析評估教材，基於後現代藝術教育理論，探討培養學生創造性思維與藝術創作之構念，訂定具體的教材評定方向與規準，最後依據此規準，透過一實例小敘述的詮釋判斷分析，評定其動畫藝術教材之品質。

In the contemporary multi-media techno-age, choosing animation as art curriculum materials is a rational approach for cultivating students' creative thinking. However, the standards applied by teachers for choosing their materials will affect students' learning. This essay will explore the criteria for assessing the quality of animation art material for the purpose of cultivating students' creative thinking.For senior high schools, this essay suggests a series of rubrics in a frame of media expression, aesthetic form, and humanities meaning, to give art teachers concrete orientation about judging the quality of art animation when they consider it for art material. At the same time, the elements of creative thinking and art creation are probed by the theories of postmodernism and art education. Moreover, we also assess the art material by the approach of narrative interpretation following these rubrics in the frame of the above three areas.

1. 陳瓊花(2012)。創造力的載體：從創意表現探討創造力具體化的圖像類型、表現策略及其意涵。資優教育論壇，11(1)，43-72。
   連結：
2. Freedman, K. (2012). Assessment of K-12 student learning rubrics. Unpublished data.Goodman(1968)..
3. Wikipedia (2013, January 18). Howl's moving castle (film)〔The free encyclopedia〕. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howl%27s_Moving_Castle_(film)
4. 維基百科（民102年1月18日）。霍爾的移動城堡（自由的百科全書）。取自http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%93%88%E7%88%BE%E7%A7%BB%E5%8B%95%E5%9F%8E%E5%A0%A1
5. Adams, L. S.(1996).The methodologies of art: An introduction.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
6. Adams, L. S.(2006).The making and meaning of art.London:Laurence King Publishing Ltd.
7. Chalumeau, J.-L.,Wang, Yu-Ling(Trans.),Huang, Hai-Ming(Trans.)(1996).Lectures de L' art.Taipei:Yuan-Liou Publishing Co., Ltd..
8. Craft, A.(2003).The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator.British Journal of Educational Studies,51(2),113-127.
9. Deleuze, G.,Guattari, F.,Massumi, Brian(Trans.)(1987).A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
10. Eisner, E. W.(Ed.),Day, M. D.(Ed.)(2004).Handbook of research and policy in art education.Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
11. EL-Murad, J.,West, D.C.(2004).The definition and measurement of creativity: What do we know?.J. Advertising Res.,44(2),188-201.
12. Gadamer, H. G.,Walker, N.(Trans.)(1986).The relevance of the beautiful and other essays,New York:
13. Gadamer, H. G.,Weinsheimer, J.(Trans.),Marshall, D. G.(Trans.)(1989).Truth and method.New York:Seabury Press.
14. Goodman, N.(1968).Language of art-An approach to a theory of symbols.New York:Bobbs-Merrill.
15. Hassan, I.(1987).The postmodern turn: essays in postmodern theory and culture,Columbus:
16. King, R.G.(1988).Computer graphics and animation as agents of personal evolution in the arts.Leonardo, Electronic Art,1,43-46.
17. National Advisory committee on creative and cultural education=NACCCE(1999).All our futures: Creativity, culture and education.London:Department for education and employment.
18. Parsons, M.(2010).Boxes and corrals: Creativity and art education revisited.The International Journal of Arts Education,8(2),31-50.
19. Ripple, R. E.(1989).Ordinary creativity.Contemporary Educational Psychology,14,189-202.
20. Sternberg, R. J.(Ed.)(1988).The nature of creativity.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
21. Wallace, D.B.(Ed.),Gruber, H.E.(Ed.)(1989).Creative people at work: Twelve cognitive case studies.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
22. 李幼蒸譯、Barthes, Roland(1991)。寫作的零度：結構主義文學理論文選。臺北市:久大。
23. 李顯立譯、Kawin, Bruce F.(1996)。解讀電影。臺北市:遠流出版社。
24. 林珮淳、陳緯倫(2005)。實驗動畫創作觀念與媒材之探討。藝術學報，76，99-112。
25. 陳瑞文(2011)。德勒茲的電影系譜：電影與哲學互為的來攏去脈。現代美術學報，21，105-136。
26. 陳瑞文(2009)。以問題性為核心的美學經驗：德勒茲的圖表思想。現代美術學報，17，11-44。
27. 陳瓊花(2005)。,臺北市:教育部。
28. 黃玉珊編、于為政編(1997)。動畫電影探索。臺北市:遠流出版社。
29. 黃道琳譯、Leach, Edmund Ronald(1994)。結構主義之父─李維史陀。臺北市:桂冠圖書。
30. 劉象愚譯、Hassan, Ihab(1993)。後現代的轉向：後現代理論與文化論文集，臺北:
31. 謝攸青(2006)。後現代藝術教育：理論建構與實例設計。嘉義市:濤石文化。