促進高職校務評鑑使用的途徑

Pathways to Promoting the Use of Vocational School Evaluation

10.6249/SE.2014.65.2.04

曾淑惠(Shu-Hui Tseng)；周士琦(Shih-Chi Chou)

評鑑使用 ； 評鑑效用 ； 高職校務評鑑 ； evaluation use ； evaluation utilization ； vocational school evaluation

中等教育

65卷2期（2014 / 06 / 01）

45 - 62

繁體中文

高職校務評鑑是提昇高職教育品質、促進高職教育發展的重要方式之一，然而許多評鑑結果或被束諸高閣，或未能與教育決策建立牢固的制度性連結，以致失去評鑑之意義。本文旨在探究學者對促進高職校務評鑑使用的途徑，首先以評鑑使用概念的發展、評鑑使用與評鑑效用的區辨、及評鑑使用的類型說明對評鑑使用之倡議；其次，從評鑑實施類別、決策或政策制定及利益關係人參與等三項，說明影響評鑑使用之因素，再者，剖析當前高職校務評鑑的用途與困境，並提出促進評鑑使用必要途徑的十二項具體建議，期使能落實高職校務評鑑之正確使用。

Vocational school evaluation is one of the methods to improve the quality of vocational school education and the development of it. However, many results of evaluations are either nonuse or unable to be firmly connected to the educational policy decision making; therefore, lose the meaning of vocational school evaluation. This essay is aimed to explore a scholar's pathways to promote the evaluation use of vocational school evaluation. It first illustrates the promotion of evaluation use by depicting the development of concepts of evaluation use, the differentiation of evaluation use and evaluation utilization, and the types of evaluation use. Second, it illustrates the factors that influence the use of evaluation from three aspects: evaluation implementation, decision or policy setting, stakeholder involvement. Third, it analyzes recent uses and dilemmas of vocational school evaluation in order to provide twelves concrete suggestions about pathways to promote the evaluation use of vocational school evaluation, which is expected to be put into practice in a correct way.

1. 張嘉育、曾淑惠(2012)。技職教育課程後設評鑑之必要性及其實施途徑。課程與教學季刊，15(3)，27-52。
   連結：
2. 黃嘉雄(2012)。影響小學對課程與教學評鑑發現利用之因素研究。課程與教學季刊，15(3)，1-16。
   連結：
3. 鄭淑惠(2009)。教育評鑑的效用性：促進組織學習的觀點。新竹教育大學教育學報，26(2)，57-88。
   連結：
4. 教育部（2007）。教育基本法。中華民國94年11月30日總統華總一義字第09400192961號令修正公布。
5. 教育部中部辦公室（2011）。101年度高職學校評鑑實施計畫。臺灣省：作者。
6. Alkin, M. C.(1985).A guide for evaluation decision makers.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
7. Alkin, M. C.(2003).Evaluation theory and practice: Insights and new directions.New Directions for Evaluation,97,81-89.
8. Alkin, M. C.,Daillak, R.,White, P.(1979).Using evaluations: Does evaluation make a difference?.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
9. Alkin, M. C.,Taut, S.(2003).Unbundling evaluation use.Studies in Educational Evaluation,29,1-12.
10. Amo, C.,Cousins, J. B.(2007).Going through the process: An examination of the operationalization of process use in empirical research on evaluation.New Directions for Evaluation,116,5-26.
11. Baptiste, L.(2010).Kent State University College and Graduate School of Education, Health, and Human Services.
12. Christie, C. A.(2007).Reported influence of evaluation data on decision makers' actions: An empirical examination.American Journal of Evaluation,28,8-25.
13. Cousins, J. B.,Leithwood, K. A.(1986).Current empirical research on evaluation utilization.Review of Educational Research,56,331-364.
14. Fitzpatrick, J.,Christie, C.,Mark, M. M.(2009).Evaluation in action: Interviews with expert evaluators.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
15. Forss, K.,Rebien, C.,Carlson, J.(2002).Process use of evaluations: Types of use that precede lessons learned and feedback.Evaluation,8(1),29-45.
16. Greene, J. C.(1988).Stakeholder utilization and participation in program evaluation.Evaluation Review,18,574-591.
17. Henry, G. T.(2000).Why not use?.New Directions for evaluation,88,85-98.
18. Johnson, K.,Greenseid, L. O.,Toal, S. A.,King, J. A.,Lawrenz, F.,Volkov, B.(2009).Research on evaluation use: A review of the empirical literature from 1986 to 2005.American Journal of Evaluation,30(3),377-410.
19. Keleghan, T.(Ed.),Stufflebeam, D.L.(Ed.)(2003).International Handbook of Educational Evaluation.Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Kellaghan, T.(Ed.),Stufflebeam, D. L.(Ed.),Wingate, L.(Ed.)(2003).International handbook of education evaluation.Boston, MA:Kluwer.
21. Kirkhart, K.(2000).Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence.New Directions for Evaluation,88,55-23.
22. Leviton, L.C.,Hughes, E.F.X.(1981).Research on the utilization of evaluations: A review and synthesis.Evaluation Review,5,525-549.
23. Patton, M. Q.(1997).Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context.Evaluation Practice,18(2),147-163.
24. Patton, M. Q.(2008).Utilization-focused evaluation.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
25. Preskill, H.,Zuckerman, B.,Matthews, B.(2003).An exploratory study of process use: Findings and implications for future research.American Journal of Evaluation,24,423-442.
26. Rebora, G.,Turri, M.(2011).Critical factors in the use of evaluation in Italian universities.Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning,61(5),531-544.
27. Rich, R. F.(1977).Uses of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action versus knowledge for understanding.Using social research in public policy making,Lexington, MA:
28. Saunders, M.(2012).The use and usability of evaluation outputs: a social practice approach.Evaluation,18(4),421-436.
29. Scriven, M.(1991).Evaluation thesaurus.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
30. Shulha, L. M.,Cousins, J. B.(1997).Evaluation use: theory, research and practice since 1986.American Journal of Evaluation,18,195-208.
31. Stevens, C. J.(1994).Evaluation misuse from a user's perspective.New Directions for Program Evaluation,64,79-84.
32. Weiss, C. H.(1980).Knowledge creep and decision accretion.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization,1(3),381-404.
33. Weiss, C. H.(1979).The many meanings of research utilization.Public Administration Review,39(5),426-431.
34. Weiss, C. H.(1998).Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation?.American Journal of Evaluation,19,21-33.
35. Wells-Marshall, J. A.(2012).Auburn University.
36. Yarbrough, D. B.,Shulha, L. M.,Hopson, R. K.,Caruthers, F. A.(2011).The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
37. 張炳煌(2012)。高中學校評鑑與優質高中認證。臺灣教育評論月刊，1(10)，8-9。
38. 張素真(2001)。校務評鑑制度實施之探析─以臺北縣政府為例：專訪臺北縣教育局張素貞督學。教育研究，91，22-29。
39. 教育部中部辦公室(2005)。臺灣省暨金馬地區九十四年度高級職業學校評鑑自我評鑑手冊。臺灣省:作者。
40. 郭昭佑(2000)。學校本位評鑑。臺北市:五南。
41. 陳漢強(1997)。大學評鑑。臺北市:五南。
42. 曾淑惠(2006)。高職學校評鑑阻礙之研究。教育政策論壇，9(3)，73-98。
43. 黃宏文(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所。
44. 潘慧玲(2006)。彰權益能評鑑之探析。當代教育研究，14(1)，1-23。
45. 潘慧玲(2004)。邁向下一代的教育評鑑：回顧與前瞻。「教育評鑑：回顧與前瞻」學術研討會，臺北市:

1. 鄭淑惠(2016)。地方教育行政機關校務評鑑運用之研究。當代教育研究季刊，24(4)，33-69。
2. (2022)。臺灣高級中學學校評鑑利用之研究：理論分析、本土指標研發及實務應用。教育政策論壇，25(2)，1-42。