服務學習－士林高商應外科「口語訓練」之課程設計與學生學習成效

Service-Learning: Course Design and Student Learning Outcome in Oral Training Courses of Shilin High School of Commerce

10.6249/SE.2015.66.4.07

莊念青(Nien-Ching Chuang)

服務學習 ； 課程設計 ； 學生學習成效 ； Service-learning ； Course design ； Student learning outcome

中等教育

66卷4期（2015 / 12 / 01）

135 - 155

繁體中文

本教學專題旨在探討士林高商應外科之口語訓練課程之課程設計，並提供該課程之學生學習成效。為了提倡應外科學生能夠務實地使用外語，提升語言學習能力，英語教師在課程中融入「服務學習」元素，讓高職應外科學生能夠在正規課堂時間，走出校園，結合鄰近社區，帶給社區內國小學童難忘的「英文繪本故事」時間。同時，這樣的繪本時間也讓語言的使用成為真實的情境，如同Billig（2002）所示，「服務學習應本於課程之設計」。學生之學習成效將以多元方式呈現其成果，包含學習歷程檔案（portfolio）、學習單、課堂觀察與發表。透過多元的評量與學習成效呈現方式，讓評量更為貼近課程之學習目標。最後，透過學生實際投入服務學習的過程，參與此課程之高二學生表示，在歷經創意激盪、反思與成長後，所投入的利他的展現，將自身之心力化為成就與感動，是本課程最大之收穫。

The teaching project aims to describe one oral training course in Shilin High School of Commerce and also provides the student learning outcome of the course. In order to help students of Applied Foreign Languages use the language in a realworld setting and sharpen their language learning ability, English teachers introduced the notion of “service learning” into the course curriculum, which plans to lead the vocational high school students out of the school during class hours, promoting a closer bondwith the neighboring community, and giving elementary school students an unforgettable story-telling lesson and experience, as Billig (2002) indicated that “service-learning is driven by curriculum.” Two classes of Applied Foreign Language department took part in the study and the students showed positive feedback and gained more confidence after they completed the project. The student learning outcomes were assessed by the means of portfolio, feedback sheets, observation and performance. Many high school participants claimed to have learnt a lot from the oral training course where service-learning was embedded. They expressed that their sense of achievement was strengthened after they made all the efforts, such as brainstorming and constant reflection on their project. Also, they felt highly moved after devoting themselves to the altruistic, helpful activities.

1. 莊念青（2010）。透過任務導向教學法淺談英文寫作教學。高職外語群科中心學校電子報，45
2. The Partnership for 21st Century Skill. http://www.p21.org/
3. Ainley, M. D.(1993).Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,85,395-405.
4. Billig, S. H.(2000).Research on K-12 school based service-learning: The evidence builds.Phi Delta Kappan,81(9),658-664.
5. Billig, S. H.(2011).Making the most of your time: Implementation of K-12 service learning standards for quality practice.Prevention Researcher,18(1),8-13.
6. Billig, S. H.(2002).Support for K-12 service learning practice: A brief view of the research.Educational Horizons,80,184-189.
7. Billig, S. H.,Conrad, J.(1997).Annual Report: K-12 Service-Learning and Educational Reform in New Hampshire.Denver:RMC Research Corporation.
8. Bringle, R. G.,Hatcher, J. A.(1996).Implementing service learning in higher education.TheJournal of Higher Education,67(2),221-239.
9. Giles, D. E.,Eyler, J.(1994).The theoretical roots of service-learning in John Dewey: Toward a theory of service-learning.Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,1(1),77-85.
10. Hermon, P.(Ed.),Dugan, R. E.(Ed.)(2004).Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education.Westport:Libraries unlimited.
11. Inozu, J.(2011).The role of non-classroom faculty in student learning outcomes in higher education context.International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,23(3),292-302.
12. Lichtenstein, G.,Thorme, T.,Cutforth, N.,Tombari, M.(2011).Development of a national survey to assess student learning outcomes of community-based research.Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement,15(2),7-29.
13. Middle States Commission on Higher Education(2007).Student Learning Assessment: Options and Resources.Philadelphia:MSCHE.
14. Nunan, D.(2004).Task-Based Language Teaching.Cambridge, UK:CambridgeUniversity Press.
15. Prentice, M.,Robinson, G.(2010).Improving student learning outcomes with service learning.Community College Journal,10(1),1-16.
16. Wallen, J.(2012).Does service-learning increase student learning?: A meta-analysis.Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,18(2),56-61.
17. 施玉惠(2001)。溝通式教學法：針對九年一貫英語新課程。英語教學，25(3)，5-21。
18. 張春興(1996)。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
19. 郭重吉(2009)。從新世紀的挑戰談中小學教育的革新。國民教育，50(1)，7-16。