题名

高中化學科差異化教學課程設計與實踐

并列篇名

Differentiated Instruction in Chemistry: Curriculum Design and Practice in High School

DOI

10.6249/SE.2016.67.4.08

作者

張堯卿(Yao-Ching Chang)

关键词

化學科 ; 差異化教學 ; 學習類型 ; 課程設計 ; chemistry ; differentiated instruction ; learning style ; curriculum design

期刊名称

中等教育

卷期/出版年月

67卷4期(2016 / 12 / 01)

页次

131 - 145

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究針對高中化學科差異化教學課程設計,以高一基礎化學其中之一個單元進行課程設計規劃與實施,探究經過單元課程設計教案的改變對學生學習成效的影響,並且分析實驗組與對照組學生的學習類型,探討兩組學生在學習類型與學習成效上之關係,研究單元課程設計教案以多媒體簡報與實作方式呈現,在教學中以分組討論進行。研究結果發現,視覺型學生與觸覺型學生在教學課程內容與呈現方面,實驗組學生成績都優於對照組學生,且達顯著性。而研究過程中研究者對於未來實施差異化教學,提出四項建議:1.分析班級學生學習型態組成、2.重新規劃單元課程設計、3.選擇適當的教學方法、4.適當安排差異化教學時間。以供教師未來進行差異化教學做參考。

英文摘要

In this study, differentiated curriculum was designed in one chemistry unit to explore how the differentiated curriculum impacts students' learning outcomes. The correlation between students' learning types and learning outcomes was also discussed in this research. As the result shows, taking students' visual and kinesthetic learning style with in curriculum content and presentation aspects into account, the experimental group's performance is significantly better than the control group's. For the implementation of differentiated teaching, there are four recommendations: first, analyze students' learning styles, second, redesign the curriculum, third, select appropriate teaching methods, and finally, arrange the implementation of differentiated teaching. We expect that this result can help teachers with better curriculum design.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 周梅雀(2006)。教師課程意識覺醒的社會解放潛力。課程與教學季刊,9(4),67-78。
    連結:
  2. 洪振方(2010)。思考導向的探究式學習對國二學生科學探究能力的影響。科學教育學刊,18(5),389-415。
    連結:
  3. Bennett, C.(1979).Teaching students as they would be taught: The importance of cultural perspective.Educational Leadership,36,259-268.
  4. Buxeda, R. J.,More, D. A.(2000).Using learning-styles data to design a microbiology course.Journal of College Science Teaching,29(3),159-160.
  5. Davidson-Shivers, G. V.,Nowlin, B.,Lanouette, M.(2002).Do multimedia lesson structure and learning styles influence undergraduate writing performance?.College Student Journal,36(1),20-32.
  6. Dunn, R.,Dunn, K.(1978).Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach.Reston, VA:Reston.
  7. Entwistle, N. J.(1981).Styles of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers.Chichester:Wiley.
  8. Fischer, B.,Fischer, L.(1979).Styles in teaching and learning.Educational Leadership,36,245-254.
  9. Fleming, N.D.,Mills, C.(1992).Helping Students Understand How They Learn.The Teaching Professor,7(4),44-63.
  10. Hofstein, A.,Lunetta, V. N.(2004).The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century.Science Education,88(1),28-54.
  11. Keefe, J. W.(Ed.)(1982).Student learning styles and brain behavior.Reston, VA:National Association of Secondary School Principals.
  12. Pask, G.(1976).Styles and strategies of learning.British Journal of Educational Psychology,46,128-148.
  13. Schmeck, R. R.(1982).Inventory of learning processes.Reston, VA:National Association of Secondary School Principals.
  14. Smithenry, D. W.(2010).Integrating guided inquiry into a traditional chemistry curricular framework.International Journal of Science Education,32(13),1689-1714.
  15. Tomlinson, C. A.(2001).How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  16. Wahl, B. N.(2003).George Mason University.
  17. Wiggins, G.,McTighe, J.(2005).Understand by design.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  18. 王全興(2007)。九年一貫課程改革實施困難之研究:以臺南縣市國小教師為例。中等教育,58(4),72-93。
  19. 王佩蓮、林碧楨(1990)。國小自然科學教學研究。臺北:五南。
  20. 王昌傑(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮市,慈濟大學。
  21. 王雅伶、段曉林(2003)。學習風格理論融入國二理化教學之個案研究。科學教育,14,105-124。
  22. 李雨蒔(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  23. 研究者(2014)。高中老師,您準備好了嗎?談如何提升教師實施學習共同體之準備度。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(11),75-82。
  24. 唐淑華(2013)。差異化教學,是「新」的教學思維嗎?!。教師天地,190,3-9。
  25. 莊煥銘、陳虹眞、沈家成(2007)。學習路徑、學習風格與數位學習績效之研究─以國中數學科為例。第十八屆國際資訊管理學術研討會
  26. 賴麗珍編譯、Wiggins, Grant、McTighe, Jay(2008)。重理解的課程設計。臺北:心理。