中文摘要
|
When evaluating students' learning process, there are few studies on the roles of inquiry-based learning and the formative assessment in mathematics curriculum in Taiwan in the past. As an effort to understand the effects of these factors, the purpose of this study is to evaluate how Taiwan's mathematics teachers perform specific tasks associated with three domains of instructional practices, including teacher-directed instruction, Formative Assessment, and Teacher Support, based on the date from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in 2012. Firstly, this study investigates the relationship between students' assessment scores in mathematics and student-related factors that influence students' assessments of teachers in those skills. Then, this study specifically compares and analyzes the students' perceptions of their mathematics teachers' classroom supports in these three sections since Taiwanese pay more attentions on the education in Shanghai and Finland,. The results of the study indicate that: there is a significant and negative relationship between formative assessment and student mathematics achievements when controlling the variation of student characteristics; there is no meaningful relationship between teacher-directed instruction and student mathematics scores; teacher support is significantly and positively related to student mathematics achievements. Students in Taiwan and Shanghai-China are more likely to agree with the availability of teacher support in schools when compared with those in Finland.
|
参考文献
|
-
Chang, C.,Chen, C.,Fun, D.,Lin, J.(2012).The Development of Formative Assessment Practice through Teachers’ Professional Learning Community and Its Impact on Student Learning Achievement.Bulletin of Educational Psychology,43(3),717-734.
連結:
-
Guskey, T. R.(2002).Professional development and teacher change.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,8(3),381-391.
-
Minister of Education of Republic of China (Taiwan) (2016). Learner-Oriented Education: The Right to Learn is replacing the Right to an Education. Retrieved from http://english.moe.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15739&CtNode=11402&mp=1
-
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Executive Summary Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/PSSM_ExecutiveSummary.pdf
-
National Research Council(1996).National Science Education Standards.New York:National Academies Press.
-
National Research Council(2012).A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas.Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
-
National Research Council(2000).Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning.Washington, D. C.:National Academy Press.
-
OECD(2014).PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving: Students’ Skills in Tackling Real-Life Problems (Volume V).OECD Publishing.
-
OECD(2008).,OECD Publishing.
-
Piaget, J.,Tomlinson, J.(transl.),Tomlinson, A.(transl.)(1976).The child’s conception of the world.Totowa:Littlefield, Adams & Co..
-
Popham, W. J.(2008).Trans Formative Assessment.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
-
Sun, M. T.,Tsai, M. H.(2007).The relationship of socioeconomic status and academic achievement- a meta-analysis.Journal of Elementary Education,19,199-222.
-
Yuen-Yee, G. C.,Watkins, D.(1994).Classroom environment and approaches to learning: An investigation of the actual preferred perceptions of Hong Kong secondary school students.Instructional Science,22(3),233-246.
|