使用6E教學策略教導國小學生製作「電磁車」專題以培養STEAM素養

A Project on Cultivating STEAM Literacy: Using 6E Teaching Strategy to Teach Elementary Students to Make ＂Simplest Electric Train＂

10.6249/SE.202003_71(1).0002

盧秀琴(Chow-Chin Lu)；賴淑菁(Shu-Ching Lai)

6E教學策略 ； STEAM素養 ； STEAM專題研究 ； 協同教學 ； 電磁車 ； 6E teaching strategy ； STEAM literacy ； STEAM project research ； collaborative teaching ； simplest electric train

中等教育

71卷1期（2020 / 03 / 01）

10 - 28

繁體中文

STEAM課程的專題研究能培養國小學生的STEAM素養，本研究採專題導向學習法，以國小六年級一個班級共28位學生為研究對象，由三位不同領域的協同教師使用6E教學策略引導學生進行「電磁車」的專題研究，包含：認識電磁車、選擇製作電磁車的材料、製作電磁車並參加競賽、設計電磁車專題等。本研究蒐集「電磁車」專題學習單、設計藍圖、專題作品、學生晤談、教師省思札記等質性資料，進行編碼、分類與詮釋。研究結果顯示：一、各組學生探索「電磁車」中，了解驅動電磁車的科學原理為鹼性電池、釹磁鐵和銅線圈產生電流磁效應。二、各組學生選擇材料製作電磁車並參加競賽中，學習跨領域的整合能力和如何制定一個操縱變因。三、各組學生製作STEAM專題，能設計藍圖並完成「電磁車」專題作品，富有創意。

The project research on the STEAM course could cultivate the STEAM literacy of elementary students. This study adopted a project-based learning in a class of six grade in an elementary school with 28 students as research subjects. Three collaborative teachers in different fields using 6E teaching strategy to guide students carry out project research on ＂simplest electric train (s-e-train)＂, including knowing s-e-train, choosing materials to make s-e-train, s-e-train competitions, designing project with s-e-train, etc. The collected data included the learning sheets, design blueprints, project works, student' interviews, teachers' reflections, etc., for encoding, classification and interpretation. The results indicated that: 1) each group of students explored the s-e-train and understood the scientific principle of driving the s-e-train, which produced the magnetic effect of electric current from alkaline batteries, neodymium magnets and copper coils. 2) Each group of students chose materials to make s-e-train and participated in competitions, learned the cross-disciplinary ability and how to control manipulated variables as factors. 3) Each group of students conducted STEAM projects, blueprints and completed s-e-train projects, which were creative.

1. 周惠柔,林弘昌(2018)。應用虛擬實境技術與 6E 教學模式於高中生活科技課程之結構教學單元設計。科技與人力教育季刊，4(3)，67-89。
   連結：
2. 范斯淳,游光昭(2016)。科技教育融入 STEM 課程的核心價值與實踐。教育科學研究期刊，61(2)，153-183。
   連結：
3. 張玉山,楊雅茹(2014)。STEM 教學設計之探討：以液壓手臂單元為例。科技與人力教育季刊，1(1)，2-17。
   連結：
4. 盧秀琴,馬士茵(2019)。設計 STEAM 課程培養國小學生的 STEAM 素養──以「動物模仿獸」為例。教育科學研究期刊，64(3)，85-118。
   連結：
5. 盧秀琴,黃麗燕(2007)。國中「細胞課程」概念改變教學之發展研究。科學教育學刊，15(3)，295-316。
   連結：
6. 簡佑宏,朱柏穎,簡爾君(2017)。STEAM 取向之 Maker 教學。中等教育，68(2)，12-28。
   連結：
7. 簡佑宏,張玉山,簡爾君(2016)。STEM 取向準工程課程設計：以二氧化碳賽車單元為例。科技與人力教育季刊，3(1)，32-52。
   連結：
8. 顏佩如,溫羚勻(2016)。業師協同教學之教學策略與學習成效之研究。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊，8，3-40。
   連結：
9. Allan, F., Mort, S., & Brian, A. (2008). NSTA presentation-STEM RAYS franklin county STEM research academies for young scientists. Retrieved from http://umassk12.net/rays/about.php
10. Baeten, M.,Simons, M.(2016).Student teachers’ team teaching: how do learners in the classroom experience team-taught lessons by student teachers?.Journal of Education for Teaching,42(1),93-105.
11. Barry, N.(2014).The ITEEA 6E learning by DeSIGN™ Model.The Technology and Engineering Teacher,73(6)
12. Bybee, R. (2009), The BSCS 5E Instructional Model and 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org.
13. Bybee, R. W.(2013).The case for STEM education: Challenges and Opportunities.NSTA Science Store.
14. Fang, N.(2013).Increasing high school students’ interest in STEM education through collaborative brainstorming with Yo-Yos.Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research,14(4),8-14.
15. Herschbach, D. R.(2011).The STEM initiative: Constraints and challenges.Journal of STEM Teacher Education,48(1),96-122.
16. Jacobs, J. A.,Frickel, S.(2009).Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment.Annual Review of Sociology,35,43-65.
17. Kaniawati, D. S.,Suryadi, S.(2016).Integration of STEM education in learning cycle 6E to improve problem solving skills on direct current electricity.International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education,1,106-109.
18. Long, R. L., II.,Davis, S. S.(2017).Using STEAM to increase engagement and literacy across disciplines.The STEAM Journal,3(1),1-11.
19. Lou, S. J.,Liu, Y. H.,Shih, R. C.,Tseng, K. H.(2011).The senior high school students' learning behavioral model of STEM in PBL.International Journal of Technology and Design Education,21(2),161-183.
20. Maeda, J.(2013).STEM+Art=STEAM.The STEAM Journal,1(1)
21. National Research Council(2012).Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing?.Washington DC:The National Academies Press.
22. Olds, S. A.,Patel, C. D.,Yalvac, B.,Kanter, D. E.,Goel, N.(2004).Developing a standards-based K-12 engineering curricula through partnerships with university students and industry.ASEE annual conference proceedings,Salt Lake City, UT:
23. Tang, K. S.,Williams, P. J.(2018).STEM literacy or literacies? Examining the empirical basis of these constructs.Review of Education
24. Watters, J. J.,Diezmann, C. M.(2013).Models of community partnerships for fostering student interest and engagement in STEM.Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research,14(2),47-55.
25. Wilhelmsson, M.,Pelling, S.,Uhlin, L.,Dahlgren, L. O.,Faresjö, T.,Forslund, K.(2012).How to think about inter professional competence: A metacognitive model.Journal of Inter professional Care,26(2),85-91.
26. Zollman, A.(2012).Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning.School Science and Mathematics,112(1),12-19.
27. 林坤誼(2014)。STEM 科際整合教育培養整合理論與實務的科技人才。科技與人力教育季刊，1(1)，1。
28. 教育部(2019).十二年基本教育課程綱要—自然科學領域課程手冊.臺北:作者.
29. 許瑛玿(2016)。面對教育改革的教師專業精進。科學研習，55(11)，41-47。
30. 盧秀琴,洪榮昭,陳芬芳(2019)。設計 STEAM 課程的協同教學—以「感控式綠建築」為例。教育學報，47(1)，113-133。
31. 盧秀琴,張儷瓊(2019)。培育在職教師應用 6E 教學法設計 STEAM課程與協同教學。2019 臺灣教育學術研討會「跨域、跨界的教育新契機」，高雄:

1. 羅藝方,楊淑晴,林佳弘,周坤億(2022)。永續發展教育架構下STREAM跨領域教育之探究。課程與教學，25(2)，87-127。
2. 湯梓辰,陳嫚瑩(2021)。STEAM在臺灣教育市場之個案探究－以香港商酷比客國際有限公司為例。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，17(4)，441-458。