STEAM體現於工藝教育

STEAM is Reflected in Industrial Arts Education

10.6249/SE.202003_71(1).0005

孔令文(Ling-Wen Kung)

STEAM ； 工藝教育 ； 陶瓷工程 ； 美術工藝 ； 核心素養 ； ceramic engineering ； art craft ； core competencies ； industrial arts education ； STEAM

中等教育

71卷1期（2020 / 03 / 01）

74 - 88

繁體中文

STEAM概念經常運用在科學、科技、工程等學科領域，但在傳統工藝教育與設計領域課程教學鮮少提及與應用。本研究以陶瓷傳統技藝之「茶席創作」茶器皿設計製作，及美術工藝專業實習「特色伴手禮茶器具設計」課程單元，以新北市立鶯歌高級工商職業學校為例，應用描述－詮釋研究法（descriptive-interpretive research method）分析工藝教育的STEAM應用，設計發展STEAM每個領域學科的專業知能評量，與學生最後完成作品之實作技能表現，完整運用到傳統工藝教育與設計領域之教學模式，以培育設計群科學生均能具備十二年國民基本教育之「核心素養」。本研究發現在STEAM導入陶瓷技藝與美術工藝專業知能評量，整體評量的Cronbach's α值為0.704，而評量表現皆以「藝術」領域之專業知能平均表現最好。

The STEAM concept is often applied in teaching design in science, technology, engineering, etc., and rarely mentioned and applied in the teaching of traditional craft education and design. This research studies on the traditional ceramic art, ＂tea mat creation＂ - tea utensil design and production, and ＂featured handicraft tea appliance design＂ - the course unite of arts and crafts professional practice. Taking the New Taipei Municipal Yingge Vocational High School as an example, the ＂descriptive-interpretive research method＂ analyzes the application of STEAM in craft education, designs and develops the professional knowledge assessments in each field of STEAM, and implements the students' skills to complete the final work, which is fully applied teaching model into traditional craft education and design in order to cultivate the design group students to have the ＂core competencies＂ of 12-year Basic Education. This study found that the performance of introducing STEAM to the ceramic technology and arts and crafts professional reached Cronbach's α value 0.704 in overall assessments. Among them, the professional knowledge in the field of ＂art＂ performed the best on average.

1. Bell, D.(2016).The reality of STEM education, design and technology teachers’ perceptions: A phenomenographic study.International Journal of Technology and Design Education,26(1),61-79.
2. Harrison, R. L.,Parks, B.(2017).How STEM can gain some STEAM: Crafting meaningful collaborations between STEM disciplines and inquiry-based writing programs.Writing program and writing center collaborations,New York, NY:
3. Herschbach, D. R.(2011).The stem initiative: Constraints and challenges.Journal of Stem Teacher Education,48(1),96-122.
4. Hong, J.-C.,Ye, J.-H.,Fan, J.-Y.(2019).STEM in fashion design: The roles of creative self-efficacy and epistemic curiosity in creative performance.EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,15(9),em1742.
5. McNew-Birren, J.,van den Kieboom, L. A.(2017).Exploring the development of core teaching practices in the context of inquiry-based science instruction: An interpretive case study.Teaching and Teacher Education,66,74-87.
6. Walther, J.,Sochacka, N. W.,Kellam, N. N.(2013).Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study.Journal of Engineering Education,102(4),626-659.
7. 李小濤,高海燕,鄒佳人,萬昆(2016)。「互聯網＋」背景下的 STEAM 教育到創客教育之變遷—從基于項目的學習到創新能力的培養。遠程教育雜誌，232，28-36。
8. 書天瑜（編）(2015).大資料時代的創意美術教育.上海:華東師範大學出版社.
9. 康自立（2000）。教育雲—教育大辭書。國家教育研究院辭書。取自 https://pedia.cloud.edu.tw/Entry/Detail/?title=%E5%B7%A5%E8%97%9D%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2
10. 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自 https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw。
11. 教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育技術型高級中等學校設計群課程綱要。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/67/108435708.pdf。
12. 陳一姍（2015 年 11 月）。新工藝教育拯救美國製造。天下雜誌。取自 https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5072492。
13. 陳瑩（2015）。STEAM 教育，玩的就是學科「跨界」。取自 https://read01.com/mQGokP.html#.WZp7x_gjGzc
14. 游奕晴(2019)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學設計學系。
15. 新南向政策資訊平臺（2019）。翻轉臺灣工藝臺灣工藝美術學校。取自 https://nspp.mofa.gov.tw/nspp/news.php?unit=406&post=153407
16. 趙慧臣,陸曉婷(2016)。開展 STEAM 教育，提高學生創新能力—訪美國 STEAM 教育知名學者格雷特．亞克門教授。開放教育研究，22(5)，4-10。
17. 親子天下（2019）。STEAM 新素養。取自 http://topic.parenting.com.tw/issue/2017/steamtoys100/knowsteam.html

1. 湯梓辰,陳嫚瑩(2021)。STEAM在臺灣教育市場之個案探究－以香港商酷比客國際有限公司為例。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，17(4)，441-458。