高中自然科學探究與實作課程之設計與實踐

The Design and Implementation of Natural Science Inquiry and Practice Curriculum for Senior High Schools in 12-year Basic Education

10.6249/SE.202112_72(4).0031

陳美蓮(Mei-Lien Chen)

十二年國教 ； 自然科學 ； 探究與實作 ； 12-year basic education ； Natural Sciences ； Inquiry and Practice

中等教育

72卷4期（2021 / 12 / 01）

93 - 106

繁體中文

本文旨在探討十二年國民基本教育高中自然科學探究與實作課程之設計與實踐。以現行108課綱高中自然科學領域的探究與實作課程的實施歷程，透過分析教師設計自然科探究與實作課程的原則，及探討目前高中自然領域「自然科學探究與實作」課程的實踐情形，包括教材內容準備、探究教學模式、教學策略與評量方式，希冀藉此提供自然科探究與實作的高中教師在設計此課程或是在教學時有更明確的方向，以合乎108課綱的理念及宗旨。本文提供幾點建議：一、教師需要參加專業社群進行跨校跨科的觀摩，以提升教學之實務經驗與知能；二、教師需徵詢專家學者的意見，參與增能研習，以建立校本主題的課程設計與做法；三、教師社群需共同研擬具體的評量規準及命題示例，以供學生依循和參考；四、課程內容宜有彈性、設備材料儘量易取得、場地安排儘量以學校現有場館。

This study explored the design and implementation of the inquiry and practice curriculum in the field of natural science in senior high schools of the 12-year National Basic Education. Through analyzing the principles of teachers' design of the inquiry and practice curriculum in the area of natural science, and exploring the current implementation of the inquiry and practice curriculum in the area of natural science in senior high schools, including preparation of teaching materials, teaching models, teaching strategies and assessment methods, it is hoped that this will provide senior high school teachers with a clearer direction in designing and teaching the inquiry and practice curriculum in line with the philosophy and objectives of the new curriculum. This study offered some suggestions: 1) teachers may need more observations of cross-school and cross-subject practices to enhance their practical teaching experience; 2) teachers may need to seek advice from experts and academics and participate in enrichment studies to develop school-based curriculum design and practices; 3) teachers may need to develop specific assessment criteria and sample questions to follow and refer to; 4) the curriculum content should be flexible, the equipment and materials should be as easy to obtain as possible, and the venues should be arranged in available facilities on campus as possible.

1. 何宗穎,王敏男,謝佩妤,郭幸直,趙大衛,黃臺珠(2013)。大學普通生物學實驗課程應用探究鷹架自我評估策略對學生探究能力表現之影響。科學教育學刊，21(4)，401-429。
   連結：
2. 張珮珊,賴吉永,溫媺純(2017)。科學探究與實作課程的發展、實施與評量：以實驗室中的科學論證為核心之研究。科學教育學刊，25(4)，355-389。
   連結：
3. 陸健榮(2017)。高中科學課程之實作復興。中等教育，68(2)，43-60。
   連結：
4. Cairns, D.,Areepattamannil, S.(2019).Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries.Research in Science Education,49(1),1-23.
5. Driver, R.,Asoko, H.,Leach, J.,Mortimer, E.,Scott, P.(1994).Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom.Educational Researcher,23(7),5-12.
6. Erduran, S.(Ed.),Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.(Ed.)(2008).Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research.Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Springer.
7. Fitzgerald, M.,Danaia, L.,McKinnon, D. H.(2019).Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: Perceptions of positively inclined early adopters.Research in Science Education,49(2),543-566.
8. Jerrim, J.,Oliver, M.,Sims, S.(2020).The relationship between inquiry-based teaching and students’ achievement. New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in England.Learning and Instruction,101310.
9. Kind, P. M.,Kind, V.,Hofstein, A.,Wilson, J.(2011).Peer argumentation in the school science laboratory-Exploring effects of task features.International Journal of Science Education,33(18),2577-2558.
10. Osborne, J.(2010).Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse.Science,328(5977),463-466.
11. Palmer, D. H.(2009).Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson.Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,46(2),147-165.
12. Ramnarain, U.,Hlatswayo, M.(2018).Teacher beliefs and attitudes about inquiry-based learning in a rural school district in South Africa.South African Journal of Education,38(1)
13. Teig, N.,Scherer, R.,Nilsen, T.(2018).More isn’t always better: The curvilinear relationship between inquiry-based teaching and student achievement in science.Learning and Instruction,56,20-29.
14. Walker, J. P.,Sampson, V.(2013).Learning to argue and arguing to learn: Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate chemistry students learn how to construct arguments and engage in argumentation during a laboratory course.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,50(5),561-596.
15. Wellington, J.,Osborne, J.(2001).Language and literacy in science education.Philadelphia, PA:Open University Press.
16. 何興中,黃禎貞,盧政良,李麗偵(2020)。自然科學領域探究與實作素養命題與分析。師友雙月刊，623，56-69。
17. 林淑梤,段曉林,靳知勤(2020).素養導向系列叢書：中學自然科學探究與實作教材教法.臺北:教育部.
18. 邱美虹(2016)。科學模型與建模：科學素養中的模型認知與建模能力。臺灣化學教育，11
19. 國家教育研究院 (2020)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校自然科學領域。檢自https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/820/十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等校自然科學領域.pdf
20. 張仁壽(2016)。教師如何因應「探究與實作」課程－以美國推動NGSS實作為例。物理教育學刊，17(1)，56-58。
21. 張堯婷,陳宏銘,吳致娟,楊明仁(2017)。地科、化學與物理跨科合作之探究與實作課程規劃。科學教育月刊，400，44-50。
22. 教育部 (2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北：教育部。
23. 教育部 (2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要：自然科學領域。臺北：教育部。
24. 陳世文(2019)。,新北:國家教育研究院。
25. 蔡清田(2011).素養：課程改革的DNA：核心素養.臺北:高等教育.
26. 盧政良(2021)。中學自然科探究與實作課程設計與實施。師友雙月刊，627，35-42。

1. (2022)。協助一所技高發展專題導向特色課程：教學模式建構、試教與其學生學習成效評估。市北教育學刊，69，89-121。