题名
|
教師轉化與實踐十二年國教課綱之個案研究:以一所技術型高中家政群為例
|
并列篇名
|
Transformation and Practice of the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education: A Case Study of Home Economics Group in a Vocational High School
|
DOI
|
10.6249/SE.202303_74(1).0002
|
作者
|
王穎珍(Ying-Zhen Wang);李懿芳(Yi-Fang Lee)
|
关键词
|
十二年國民基本教育課程綱要 ; 課程轉化與實踐 ; 技術型高級中等學校家政群 ; 12-year basic education curriculum guidelines ; curriculum transformation and implementation ; home economics group in a vocational high school
|
期刊名称
|
中等教育
|
卷期/出版年月
|
74卷1期(2023 / 03 / 01)
|
页次
|
12
-
34
|
内容语文
|
繁體中文;英文
|
中文摘要
|
本研究旨在探究技高教師於十二年國教課程綱要的轉化與實踐歷程,包括心理轉變、遭遇困難與因應策略,並從慎思、反省、批判、行動與解放等歷程,分析教師的轉化經驗。採個案研究,以一所技高的四位家政群教師為個案,於新課綱實施第一學期間進行深度訪談與教學觀察。研究發現:一、個案教師轉化新課綱經歷初期憂慮、體認變革需要、逐漸調整思維等心理歷程;二、個案教師依循課綱規範進行課程轉化,已達表層改變,但信念與態度尚未全然轉變;三、個案教師轉化課綱為課程教學,遇到素養導向及跨域教學能力不足及新增專業科目教學準備不夠等困難;四、個案教師透過專業社群與研習、尋求行政支援及傾聽學生內在聲音等途徑來因應困境;五、個案教師在課程實踐過程中,大致達到慎思與反省程度,惟在批判、行動與解放上仍待深化。據此提出建議作為後續技高教師實踐新課綱之參據。
|
英文摘要
|
This study explored the transformation and practice of the 12-year basic education curriculum guidelines in the case school. The scope included the transition of teachers' attitudes, the challenges, and the process of deliberation, introspection, criticism, action and liberation. The study adopted in-depth interviews and observation as the major research methods. The data was collected from four teachers in the home economics group in a vocational high school. The results included: 1. The case teachers transformed the curriculum through the stages- initial anxiety, recognizing the needs for change, and gradually adapting and accepting. 2. The case teachers transformed curriculum on the surface, but actually their beliefs and attitudes had not changed yet. 3. The main difficulties were the lack of competence-based and transdisciplinary teaching ability, and insufficient preparation for new subjects. 4. The case teachers coped with the difficulties by participating in teachers' professional communities, seeking administrative support, and listening to students' inner voices. 5. They had generally reached the level of deliberation and reflection, but the practice of criticism, action and liberation needed to be deepened. According to the findings, the study provided several suggestions for vocational high school's teachers to practice the new curriculum guidelines.
|
主题分类
|
社會科學 >
教育學
|
参考文献
|
-
李懿芳,胡茹萍,田振榮(2017)。技術型高級中等學校技能領域課綱理念、發展方式及其轉換為教科書之挑戰。教科書研究,10(3),69-99。
連結:
-
張芬芬,陳麗華,楊國揚(2010)。臺灣九年一貫課程轉化之議題與因應。教科書研究,3(1),1-40。
連結:
-
甄曉蘭(2003)。教師的課程意識與教學實踐。教育研究集刊,49(1),63-94。
連結:
-
簡梅瑩(2008)。促進反思教學發展與實施之行動研究。中等教育,59(1),22-35。
連結:
-
Bridges, W.,Mitchell, S.(2000).Leading transition: A new model for change.Leader to Leader,16,30-36.
-
Goodlad, J.(Ed.)(1979).Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice.McGraw-Hill.
-
Grundy, S.(1987).Curriculum: Products or praxis.The Falmer Press.
-
Jackson, P. W.(Ed.)(1992).Handbook of research on curriculum.Macmillan.
-
Johnston, S. E.(1990).Understanding curriculum decision-making through teacher images.Journal of Curriculum Studies,22(5),463-471.
-
Norcross, J. C.,Krebs, P. M.,Prochaska, J. O.(2011).Stages of change.Journal of Clinical Psychology,67(2),1-12.
-
Pinar, W. F.(1978).The reconceptualization of curriculum studies.Journal of Curriculum Studies,10,205-214.
-
Schon, D.(1987).Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions.Jossey Bass.
-
Shulman, L.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-22.
-
Speark, A.(1990).Curriculum change and physical education: Towards a micropolitical understanding.Deakin University Press.
-
Wittrock, M. C.(Ed.)(1986).Handbook of Research on Teaching.Macmillan.
-
尹弘飈,李子建(2008).課程變革:理論與實踐.高等教育.
-
吳清山,林天祐(2011)。課程轉化。教育資料與研究雙月刊,102,203-204。
-
教育部(2022)。十二年國民基本教育技術型高級中等學校群科課程手冊─家政群。https://reurl.cc/lvorjY
-
教育部(2021b)。十二年國民基本教育技術型高級中等學校群科課程綱要─家政群。https://reurl.cc/WDrQo9
-
教育部(2021a)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/Website/11/WebContent/35922/RFile/35922/96144.pdf
-
許雅涓(2000)。臺北,國立臺北師範學院。
-
黃政傑(2005).課程改革新論─教育現場虛實探究.冠學.
-
歐用生(2003)。誰能不在乎課程理論?教師課程理論的覺醒。教育資料集刊,28,373-387。
-
歐用生(2000).課程改革:九年一貫課程的獨白與對話.師大書苑.
|