都市資訊系統發展計畫執行成效檢核方法之研究

A Study on the Evaluation Method of Executive Effectiveness for the Urban Information System Planning

鄒克萬(Ko-Wan Tzou)；蔡博淵(Po-Yuang Tsai)；張學聖(Hsueh-Sheng Chang)

都市資訊系統 ； 國土資訊系統 ； 模糊理論 ； 差異量測法 ； Urban Information System ； National Geographic Information System ； Fuzzy Theory ； Variation Measure Method

都市與計劃

25卷1期（1998 / 03 / 01）

1 - 22

繁體中文

都市資訊系統正隨著國土資訊系統政策之推動，而在各單位間陸續的規劃與建置之中。然而此類資訊系統一般具有投資費用龐大、系統建置時間長、系統技術較新、使用者認知程度不一致等特性。再加上資訊科技日新月異、環境條件變化較大等因素，使得此類系統除了在研擬發展計畫時應加強各項系統評估工作外，於系統發展計畫執行時，更有必要配合執行時程，追蹤檢核系統發展成效，以掌握系統未來進一步發展之方向，並確保系統之投資效益。 為有效檢核都市資訊系統發展計畫之執行成效，本文乃以模糊理論與差異量測法為基礎，發展出一套新的檢核方法。文中並將以嘉義縣綜合發展計畫資訊系統為例，進行實証研究。經實証結果可得知，此種研究方法，的確能提供系統執行效益檢核之資訊。研究內容包括：一、前言；二、系統評估方法之回顧；三、系統成效檢核之架構與方法；四、實証分析；五、結論。

Under the national policy of building Taiwan's National Geographical Information System, different government departments are planning and installing their own Urban Information Systems recently. However, this kind of information system are generally characterised with high capital investment, long construction time, frequent technical innovations and inconsistent recognition among different system users. These characteristics, when combined with the effects from the rapid change of information techniques as well as the great variation of the environment, have prompted a fact. The fact is that in order to have better knowledge of future development and to secure benefits from the system investment, except for the emphasis on the system evaluation process in the executing stage, close monitoring and system evaluation during the system running period should also receive considerable attentions. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of a urban information systems, a new evaluation method is proposed in this study on the basis of the fuzzy theory and variation measuring. Technical analysis is carried out under the Chiayi County Comprehensive Plan Information System. It was revealed that the new method is capable of providing information about the effectiveness evaluation of the system. This study consists of five parts: preface, followed by a review of system evaluation methods, a description of the framework and method of the system effectiveness evaluation, these leads to the technical analye, and some conclusions are made upon the results of technical analyses.

1. Aronoff, S.(1989).Geographic Information System: A Management Perspective.Ottawa, Canada:WDL Publication.
2. Clapp, J. L.(1989).Toward a Method for the Evaluation of Multipurpose Land Information System.Journal of URISA,1
3. Cross, B. A.(1990).Estimating and Comparing Tangible and Intangible Benefits to the Costs of Geographic Information System.Proceedings of the 1990 URISA Conference
4. Davis, F. D.(1989).Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems,13(3)
5. Dickinson, H. J., Calkins, H. W.(1988).The Economic Evaluation of Implementing a GIS.International Journal of Geographical Information Systems,2(4)
6. Ginzberg, M. J.(1981).Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions.Management Science,27(4)
7. Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., Segars, A. H.(1996).Information System Effectiveness: The Construct Space and Patterns of Application.Information ＆ Management,31
8. Ives, B., Olson, M. H.(1984).User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research.Management Science,30(5)
9. Jackson, J.(1994).Methods for Quantifying Application Development Costs.URISA 1994 Annual Conference Proceedings
10. Kim, K. K.(1989).User Satisfaction: A Synthesis of Three Different Perspectives.The Journal of Information System,4
11. Kishor, P.(1990).Evaluating GIS/ LIS: Lessons from CONSOIL.1990 GIS/ LIS Conference Proceedings
12. Lerner, N. B.(1994).Quantifying GIS Benefits: A Bottom-Up Approach that Builds Management Confidence.URISA 1994 Annual Conference Proceedings
13. Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., Kavan, C. B.(1995).Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness.MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems,19(2)
14. Seddon, P., Yip, S. K.(1992).An Empirical Evaluation of User Information Satisfaction (UIS) Measures for Use with General Ledger Accounting Software.Journal of Information Systems,6(1)
15. Smith, D. A., Tomlinson, R. F.(1992).Assessing Costs and Benefits of GIS: Methodological and Implementation issues.International Journal Geographical Information Systems,6(3)
16. 白裕雄(1987)。國立交通大學管理科學研究所。
17. 朱子豪 Chu, Tzu-How(1994)。都市地理資訊系統整體規劃－以高雄市為例。國立臺灣大學理學院地理學系地理學報 National Taiwan University Department of Geography Journal of Geographical Sience，17
18. 林建元 Lin, Chien-Yuan、 蘇振綱 、 白仁德 Pai, Jen-Te(1994)。公共地理資訊系統之價值估計。中華民國區域科學學會第五屆年會論文研討會
19. 林峰田 Lin, Feng-Tyan(1995)。區域及都市計畫資料庫示範計畫。內政部營建署。
20. 林峰田 Lin, Feng-Tyan(1996)。縣市綜合發展計畫資訊系統（第五期）第二次期中報告。臺灣省政府住宅及都市發展局。
21. 林峰田 Lin, Feng-Tyan、 陳亮全(1991)。縣市地理資訊系統基本模式規劃設計之研究。內政部資訊中心。
22. 柯文浩(1995)。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。
23. 財團法人資訊工業策進會(1993)。整合式地理資訊系統本土化軟體可行性研究。內政部。
24. 國立臺灣大學地理學研究所(1993)。高雄市地理資訊系統整體規劃第二階段期末報告第一冊。高雄市政府地政處土地測量大隊。
25. 張有恆 Chang, Yu-Hern、 蔡欽同(1993)。模糊理論應用於公車系統營運服務績效評估之研究。運輸計劃 Transportation Planning Journal，22(1)
26. 馮德益 、 樓世博(1988)。模糊數學－方法與應用。臺北:科技圖書有限公司。
27. 黃昌意(1994)。資訊技術之效益評估與經營管理。財團法人資訊工業策進會。
28. 鄒克萬 Tsou, Ko-Wan、 蔡博淵 Tsai, Po-Yuang(1996)。應用模糊理論於縣市綜合發展計畫資訊系統建置計畫評估方法之研究。國立成功大學都市計劃研究所資訊研究室。
29. 闕頌廉(1994)。應用模糊數學。台北:科技圖書股份有限公司。
30. 藎壚(1991)。實用模糊數學。台北:亞東書局。
31. 蘇振綱(1993)。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。

1. 鄒克萬、張學聖、李薇(2008)。運用模糊綜合評估方法進行資訊城市發展計畫評估之研究—台北市網路新都爲例。建築學報，65，139-156。