上班者平日之交通/活動關連分析：以台南都會區為實證

Travel-Activity Analysis of Workers on a Weekday : a Case Study of Metropolis Tainan

葉光毅(Kuang-Yih Yeh)；黃幹忠(Kan-Chung Huang)；夏皓清(Hao-Ching Hsia)

時空限制條件 ； 交通/活動日程表 ； 活動日誌調查法 ； 場所選擇 ； 交通/活動類型選擇 ； time-space constraints ； travel-activity schedule ； activity diary survey ； locations choices ； travel-activity patterns choice

都市與計劃

31卷1期（2004 / 03 / 01）

25 - 45

繁體中文

都市內發生的交通需求，可被視為活動者(人)在時空限制之下，為了實施在不同地點發生的活動而衍生的結果。若政策分析過程中未納入此重要觀念，則一旦時空限制條件有所變化時，交通/活動行為相對改變的關係即無從得知，故亦無法有效地支援政策的擬定與實施。因此本研究乃針對台南都會區之上班者，以「活動日誌調查法」記錄其於平日之一日完整行程，並將上班者在實施活動時所遭遇之時空限制條件納入模式之中，建構出以「交通/活動日程表」為基礎的二階段交通/活動選擇模式。研究結果顯示，在場所選擇模式方面，不論是「上班前」或「下班後」，「交通時間變數」及「活動持續時間」皆對上班者選擇活動場所有顯著的影響。在交通/活動類型選擇模式方面，上班前的「可利用時間」會明顯影響上班者對交通/活動類型的選擇，而且其會偏好「總交通時間」短的類型。在下班後，可利用時間亦會明顯影響上班者對交通/活動類型的選擇，且其為了實施較多的活動，相對也必須要花費較多的交通時間。

The travel demands within a city can be regarded as the result of people trying to hold activities in different places under the constraints of time and space. This idea must be included in the analytical process, or the influences to individuals’ decisions and travel behavior due to time-space constraints could not be accounted for and could not support effective policy analysis when activity patterns change. This study sampled workers in metropolis Tainan and recorded a weekday travel-activity schedule by using an “activity diary survey”. Furthermore, the constraints of time and space were taken into account, and a two stage choice model based on travel-activity schedule was constructed. The result of the location choice models show it is the same that both “before work” and “after work”, “travel time” and “duration” both had significant effect on workers. “Available time” and “total travel time” also have significant effect on workers’ travel-activity pattern choice. After work, Workers also preferred travel-activity patterns with short “total travel time”.

1. Ben-Akiva , M. E.,Bowman, J. L.(1998).Integration of an activity-based model system and a residential location model.Urban Studies,25(7),1131-1153.
2. Bhat, C. R.(1996).A hazard-based duration model of shopping activity with nonparametric baseline specification and nonparametric control for unobserved heterogeneity.Transportation Research Part,30,189-207.
3. Bowman, J. L.,Ben-Akiva, M. E.(2000).Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules.Transportation Research Part,35,1-28.
4. Bruzelius, N.(1979).The Value of Travel Time: Theory and Measurement.London:Croom Helm.
5. Clarke, M. I.,Dix, M. C.,Jones, P. M.(1981).Error and uncertainty in travel surveys.Transportation,10,105-126.
6. Damm, D.(1982).Parameters of activity behavior for use in travel analysis.Transportation Research Part A,16,135-148.
7. Damm, D.,Lerman, S. R.(1981).A theory of activity scheduling behavior.Enviroment and Planning A,13,703-818.
8. De Serpa, A. C.(1971).A theory of the economics of time.Economic Journa,81(324),828-846.
9. De Serpa, A. C.(1973).Microeconomics theory and the valuation of travel time: some clarification.Regional and Urban Economics,12(4),411-412.
10. Golob, T. F.,Kitamura, R.,Lula, C.(1994).Modeling the effects of commuting time on activity duration and non-work travel.Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board.
11. Hägerstrand, T.(1970).What about people in regional science？.Papers of the Regional Science Association,24,7-21.
12. Hamed, M. M.,Mannering, F. L.(1993).Modeling travelers' postwork activity involvement: toward a new methodology.Transportation Science,27(4),381-394.
13. Jones, P. M.,Koppelmann, F. S.,Orfuil, J. P.(1988).Activity analysis: state-of-the art and future directions.Oxrord conference on travel and transportation.
14. Kitamura, R.(1984).A model of diary time allocation to discretionary out-of-home activities and trips.Transportation Research Part B,18,225-266.
15. Kitamura, R.,Chen, C.,Pendyala, R. M.(1997).Generation of synthetic daily activity-travel patterns.Transportation Research Record,1607,154-162.
16. Kitamura, R.,Kermanshah, M.(1984).Sequential model of interdependent activity and destination choices.Transportation Research Record,987,81-89.
17. Kitamura, R.,Kermanshah, M.(1983).Identifying time and history dependencies of activity choice.Transportation Research Record,944,67-81.
18. Kitamura, R.,Robinson, J. R.,Golob, T. F.,Bradly, M. A.,Leonard, J.,van der Hoorn, T.(1992).A comparative analysis of time use data in the Netherlands and California.in proceedings of the 20th PTRC Summer Annual Meeting: Transportation Planning Methods.
19. Kurani, K. S.,Lee-Gosselin, M. E. H.(1996).Synthesis of past activity analysis applications.presented at the TMIP Conference on Activity-Based Travel Forecasting, and published in these proceedings.
20. Kwan, M. P.(2000).Interactive geovisualization of activity-travel patterns using three imensional geographical information systems: a methodological exploration with a large data set.Transportation Research Part C,8,185-203.
21. Pas, E. I.(1984).The effect of selected sociodemographic characteristic on daily travel-activity behavior.Environment and Planning A,16,571-581.
22. Pendyala, R. M.,Kitamura, R.,Presuna, Reddy D. V. G.(1998).Application of an activity-based travel-demand model incorporating a rule-based algorithm.Environment and Planning B,25,753-772.
23. 中華民國行政院主計處
24. 磯部友彥(1990)。名古屋大學名古屋大學,未出版

1. 戴大雄、葉光毅、黃幹忠(2006)。台南市居民之假日旅運／活動行為選擇模式建構。都市與計劃，33(2)，69-91。