景觀生態面指數分析汐止地區1990一2001年土地利用時空問鑲嵌特徵

APPLYLING LANDSCAPE ECOLOGICAL MATRICES TO CHARACTERIZE SPATIOTEMPORAL LAND USE MOSAIC IN HSICHIH AREA FROM 1990 TO 2001

10.6128/CP.31.3.239

林裕彬(Yu-Pin Lin)；吳振發(Wung-Po Teng)；鄧東波(Tung-Po Teng)

土地利用變遷 ； 景觀生態 ； 景觀生態指數 ； 遙測 ； 地理資訊系統 ； Land use change ； Landscape ecology ； landscape ecological metrics ； Remote sensing ； GIS

都市與計劃

31卷3期（2004 / 10 / 01）

239 - 268

繁體中文

土地利用是人類在土地上活動的表徵，其形態與狀態呈現多時空尺度特徵，因受到經濟、文化、政治、歷史和土地所有權因子等影響，而呈現出具某種程度的複雜性與不確定性，且時空間特徵產生變化的原因也是複雜與多樣。本研究以景觀生態學為基礎，應用衛星影像、地理資訊系統、景觀生態指數分析方法，以台北縣汐止市為研究地區，以1990至2001年衛星影像為材料運用，景觀生態結構指數評估土地利用型態、特徵與空間結構的變遷，以了解土地利用分布、組成與變化；並透過生態結構指數與土地利用之相關性，嘗試分析土地開發管理政策對土地利用變遷之影響，提出應用景觀生態指數於土地利用規劃與管理構想。研究結果顯示汐止市整體土地利用與高密度植生地於1998年以前空間特徵趨於零碎化，之後趨向規整化；低密度植生地1996年前後空間鑲嵌的特徵有顯著差異；建成地則是呈現1990－1995、1995－1997、1997－2001三階段變遷。整體而言，嵌塊體指標及空間結構指標較能反應出汐止地區高、低密度植生地與建成地之土地利用類別交互鑲嵌關係。另外，建成地的開發對高密度植生地的影響高於低密度植生地，且山坡地開發管制政策的嚴謹度不同，會顯著影響建成地、高密度與低密度植生地土地利用別間轉換關係及空間特徵的表現。在研究方法上，發現景觀生態指數是分析土地利用時空間特徵變化的有效工具，且可藉由景觀生態結構指數分析與解釋汐止地區1990－1993、1994－1997及1998－2001年三階段土地開發管制策略對整體土地利用、高密度植生地、低密度植生地、建成地空間發展之影響。

Land use is the human activity affecting by economical, cultural, political and historical factors and presents complex, uncertainty and spatiotemporal characteristics. This paper analyzes spatiotemporal land use mosaic in urban fringe, Hsichih city, and impacts of land use strategies on land use change. The process of this study is follows: First, we calculate the landscape index after classifying land use categories from SPOT satellite imageries form 1990 to 2001 in study area. Moreover, to analyze the land use area transition between high and low density vegetation areas and building areas. Thirdly, to analyze land use characterizes changed in landscape and class scale level from 1990 to 2001 according to the landscape index. Finally, the work presents relationship between policies of land use control and land use change. The findings reveal that spatial character of landscape and high density vegetation became fragmental before 1998 but aggregative after 1998. The turning point of the tremendous change in low density vegetation is 1996. Building area presented different trends in 1990-1995, 1995-1997 and 1997-2001 periods, respectively. Otherwise, patch and spatial metrics are suitable to response the land use mosaic between high and low density vegetation areas and building areas. Impact of building development on high density vegetation area is stronger than the low one. These differences of control strategies in hillside affect the transition relationship between different land uses and spatial distribution. Based on the conclusion in methodology, we find that landscape ecological metrics significantly characterize spatiotemporal land use mosaic in landscape and class scale. On the other hand, they illustrated land use control strategies affecting structural change in landscape, low and high density vegetation areas, and building areas in Hsichih city in three stages ,1990-1993, 1994-1997, 1998-2001, respectively.

1. 張靜貞、羅紀琼、林振輝(2003)。基隆河汐止、五堵地區居民參與洪災保險意願之研究。台灣經濟預測與政策，1(34)，39-61。
   連結：
2. 黃書禮、高文彥(2002)。天然災害損失之能值評估－以汐止地區象神颱風爲例。都市與計劃，1(29)，89-113。
   連結：
3. Andersen, O.,Crow, T. R.,Lietz, S. M.,Stearns, F.(1996).Transformation of a landscape in the upper mid-west, USA: The history of the lower St. Croix river vally, 1830 to present.Landscape and Urban Planning,35,247-267.
4. Apan, A. A.,Raine, S. R.,Paterson, M. S.(2002).Mapping and analysis of changes in the riparian landscape structure of the Lockyer Valley catchment, Queensland, Australia.Landscape and Urban Planning,59,43-57.
5. Baker, W. L.(1992).The landscape ecology of large disturbances in the design and management of nature reserves.Landscape Ecology,7(3),181-194.
6. Bell, S.(2001).Landscape pattern, perception and visualization, in the visual management of forests.Landscape and Urban Planning,54,201-211.
7. Berger, J.(1987).Guidelines for landscape synthesis: some directions- old and new.Landscape and Urban Planning,14,295-311.
8. Bjorklund, J.,Limburg, K. J.,Rydberg, T.(1999).Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: an example from Sweden.Ecological Economics,29(2),269-291.
9. Cook, E. A.(2002).Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological network.Landscape and Urban Planning,58,269-280.
10. Craig, M. R.(1999).Landscape Patterns along the Upper Mississippi River.Upper Mississippi River Long Term Resource Monitoring Program.
11. Dramstad, W. E.,Fhellstad, W. J.,Strand, G. H.,Mathiesen H. F.,Engan, G.,Stokland J. N.(2002).Development and implementation of the Norwegian monitoring programme for agricultural landscapes.Journal of Environmental Management,64(1),49-63.
12. Dramstard, W. E.,Olson J. D.,Forman R. T. T.(1996).Landscape Principles in Landscape Architecture and Land-use Planning.Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
13. Eldridge, D. J.,Koen T. B.(2003).Detecting environmental change in eastern Australia: rangeland health in the semi-arid woodlands.The Science of the Total Environment,310,211-219.
14. Forman, R. T. T.(1995).Land Mosaics: the Ecology of Landscapes and Regions.New York:Cambridge University Press.
15. Forman, R. T. T.,Godron, M.(1986).Landscape Ecology.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
16. Gustafson, E, J.,Parker, G. R.(1992).Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern.Landscape Ecology,17(2),102-103.
17. Hainesyoung, R.,Chopping, M.(1996).Quantifying landscape structure- A review of landscape indexes and their application to forest landscape.Process in Physical Geography,20(4),418-445.
18. Herold, M.,Goldstein, N. C.,Clarke, K. C.(2003).The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling.Remote Sensing of Environment,86,286-302.
19. Hessburg, P. G.,Smith, B. G.,Salter, R. B.,Ottmar, R. D.,Alvarado, E.(2000).Recent changes (1930s-1990s) in spatial patterns of interior Northwest forests, USA.Forest Ecology and Management,136,53-83.
20. Hietala-Koivu, R.(2000).Landscape and modernizing agriculture: a case study of three areas in Finland in 1954-1998.Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,91,273-281.
21. Kienast, F.(1993).Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information System-a methodological outline.Landscape Ecology,8(2),103-118.
22. Kuczenske, T. K.,Field, D. R.,Voss, P. R.,Raeloff, V. C.,Hagen, A. E.(2000).Integrating Demographic and Landsat (TM) Data ay a Watershed Scale.Journal of the American Water Resources Association,36(1),215-228.
23. Lausch, A.,Herzog, F.(2002).Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability.Ecological Indicators,2(1-2),3-15.
24. Leito, A. B.,Ahern, J.(2002).Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning.Landscape and Urban Planning,59,65-93.
25. Li, B. L.,Archer, S.(1997).Weighted mean patch size: a robust index for quantifying landscape structure.Ecological Modelling,102(2-3),353-361.
26. Lin, Y. P.,Teng, T. P.,Chang, T. K.(2002).Multivariate analysis of soil heavy metal pollution and landscape pattern in Changhua county in Taiwan.Landscape and Urban Planning,62,19-35.
27. Linehan, J.,Gross, M.,Finn, J.(1995).Greenway planning: developing a landscape ecological network approach.Landscape and Urban Planning,33,179-193.
28. Lucas, I. F. J.,Frans. J. M.,Wel, V. D.(1994).Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: A review.Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,60(4),410-432.
29. Luck, M.,Wu, J.(2002).A gradient analysis of the landscape pattern of urbanization in the Phoenix metropolitan area of USA.Landscape Ecology,17,327-339.
30. McGarigal, K.,Marks, B. J.(1995).FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure.USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tec. Rep. PNW-351
31. Mendoza, S. J. E.,Etter, R. A.(2002).Multitemporal analysis (1940-1996) of land cover changes in the southwestern Bogota highplain (Colombia).Landscape and Urban Planning,59,147-158.
32. Naveh, Z.,Lieberman, A. S.(1993).Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application.New York:Springer-Verlag Press.
33. Obeysekera, J.,Rutchey, K.(1997).Selection of scale for everglades landscape models.Landscape Ecology,12(1),7-18.
34. Ochoa-Gaona, S.(2001).Traditional Land-Use Systems and Patterns of Forest Fragmentation in the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico.Environmental Management,27(4),571-586.
35. Olsson, E. G. A.,Austrheim, G.,Grenne, S. N.(2000).Landscape change pattern in mountains, land use and environmental diversity, Mid-Norway 1960-1993.Landscape Ecology,15,115-170.
36. Reed, R. A.,Johnsonbarnard, J.,Baker, W. L.(1996).Fragmentation of a Forested Rock-Mountain Landscape.Biological Conservation,75(3),267-278.
37. Riitters, K. H.,O`Neill R. V.,Hunsaker, C. T.,Wickham, J. D.,Yankee, D. H.,Timmins, K. B.,Jackson, B. L.(1995).A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics.Landscape Ecology,10,23-29.
38. Ruuska, R.,Helenius, J.(1996).GIS analysis of change in an agricultural landscape in central Finland.Agriculture Food Science Finland,5,567-576.
39. Tjallingii, S. P.(2000).Ecology on the edge: Landscape and ecology between town and country.Landscape and Urban Planning,48,103-119.
40. Turner, B. L. II.,Meyer, W. B.(1994).Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective.New York:Melbourne.
41. Turner, B. L. II.,Skole, D.,Sanderson, D.,Fischer, G.,Fresco, G.,Leemans, R.(1995).IGBP Report No. 35 and HDP Report No. 7.Stochkolm:Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
42. Turner, B. L.,Moss, R. H.,Skole, eds. D. L.(1993).IGBP report No. 24 and the HDP report No. 5.Stochkolm:Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
43. Turner, M. G.,Gardner, R. H.(1991).Applied nonparametric statistical methods in landscape ecology.New York:Springer.
44. U.S. National Research Council(1997).Rediscovering Geography Committee.Washington, D.C.:National Academy Press.
45. Wickham, J. D.,Norton, D. J.(1994).Mapping and analyzing landscape patterns.Landscape Ecology,9(1),7-23.
46. 余烈(2000)。汐止淹水問題探討與防洪建議。營建天下，58，7-8。
47. 李天浩(1999)。瑞伯颱風汐止淹水原因探討與臺北防洪計畫之評析。土木水利，25，89-99。
48. 林裕彬、林怡君(1999)。以景觀生態觀點探討蘆竹鄉農田景觀結構。中國文化大學地理研究報告，12，107-130。
49. 林裕彬、柳文成(1999)。農田景觀生態結構與異質性探討－以桃園蘆竹鄉爲例。環境規劃與管理研討會
50. 林裕彬、曾正輝、鄧東波(2002)。景觀生態指數於集水區整體景觀時空間型態變遷探討。農業工程學報，1(48)，64-81。
51. 柯一青(2002)。汐止橫科地區淹水原因探討與應急排水改善工程計畫。北縣工務，13，29-31。
52. 洪賑基(2000)。汐止洪患與基隆河整治之省思。營建天下，58，4-6。
53. 張伯宇(2000)。汐止的地形、地質與水土災害。北縣文化，67，4-13。
54. 陳堯中、廖洪鈞、林宏達、陳志南(1998)。汐止林肯大郡災變原因探討。地工技術，68，29-40。
55. 華梅英(2000)。GIS應用於汐止地區人口變遷之研究。東南學報，23，175-188。
56. 台灣永續發展指標
57. 鄔建國(2003)。景觀生態學－格局、過程、尺度與等級。台北市:五南。
58. 廖朝軒、廖燿隆、陳弘、王文江(2003)。基隆河汐止地區減洪策略之規劃研究。中國土木水利工程季刊，3(15)，557-566。
59. 熊惠波、侯會喬、江源、耿侃(2002)。扎魯特旗土地利用變化及其驅動力分析。農村生態環境，3(18)，5-10。
60. 趙翊瑾(2002)。台灣大學森林學研究所。
61. 薛怡珍(2002)。地景生態過程與時空尺度之關係。台灣林業，4(28)，15-23。
62. 簡甫任(2001)。逢甲大學土地管理研究所。
63. 簡賢文、葉俊興、樓振宇(2003)。高樓建築物之防災問題與對策概念－以汐止東方科學園區火災爲例。現代消防，95，15-36。

1. 陳珮琦(2017)。氣候變遷與土地利用變遷對水文服務的影響-以大屯溪流域為例。國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系學位論文。2017。1-105。