跨界生產網絡之在地鑲嵌與地方性制度之演化：以大東莞地區為例

The Local Embeddedness of the Trans-Border Production Networks and the Evolution of Local Institutions: A Case Study of Greater Dongguan Area's IT Cluster

10.6128/CP.32.3.277

楊友仁(You-Ren Yang)；夏鑄九(Chu-Joe Hsia)

跨界生產網絡 ； 在地鑲嵌 ； 制度 ； 資訊電子業台商 ； 區位優勢 ； 產業聚落 ； 區域發展 ； 全球化 ； Trans-border production networks ； Local embeddedness ； Institution ； Taiwanese IT companies ； Locational advantage ； Cluster ； Regional development ； Globalization

都市與計劃

32卷3期（2005 / 10 / 01）

277 - 301

繁體中文

本文主要透過重構的「在地鑲嵌」概來解析大東莞地區資訊電子產業聚落的發展特性，我們認為大東莞地區已從台商的外銷飛地逐漸轉化為內銷的橋頭堡，台商資訊電子業跨界生產網絡在大東莞地區呈現了「再鑲嵌」的現象，然而過去有利於出口貿易的若干地方性制度卻成為轉型的制度瓶頸。經由本文的經驗研究，我們認為本文重新梳理的「在地鑲嵌」概念可以更清楚地掌握跨界生產網絡與被投資地區更複雜而動態的互動形式，對於全球化下的區域發展較傳統的「區位優勢」概念有著更深刻的分析能力。

This article aims at investigating the characteristics of IT cluster in the Greater Dongguan Area (GDA) by reconstructing the concept of ”local embeddedness”. We argue that the GDA had transformed from an export-oriented enclave to the bridge -head for the Taiwanese IT companies to explore the Mainland's market. The Taiwanese IT production networks are 're-embedding' in the GDA, but local institutions that used to support export now become the bottleneck for the transformation. Finally, this study shows that the concept of ”local embeddedness” we reconstructed could capture the dynamics of interaction between the trans-border production networks and the host regions suitably, and the concept has more analytical potential than that of ”locational advantage” in exploring globalized regional development.

1. 蔡宏明(2002)。中國大陸加入WTO後對臺商投資之影響一兼論我政府之政策調整。遠景基金會季刊，3(3)，161-210。
   連結：
2. 鄭陸霖(1999)。一個半邊陸的浮現與隱藏:國際鞋類市場網絡重組下的生產外移。台灣社會研究季刊，35，1-46。
   連結：
3. Amin, A.,Thrift, N.,P. Healey (edited),S. Cametron,S. Davoudi(1995).In Managing Cities:the New Urban Context.Chichester:John Wiley & Sons.
4. Chen, H.,Chen, T. J.(1998).Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment.Journal of International Business Studies,29(3),445-467.
5. Dicken, P.(1992).The Global Shift:Transforming the World Economy.London:Sage.
6. Dicken, P.,Forsgren, M.,Malmberg, A.,Amin, A. (edited),Thrift, N.(1994).Institutions and Regional Development in Europe.Oxford:University Press.
7. Dicken, P.,Thrift, N.(1992).The organization of production and the production of organization:why business enterprises matter in the study of geographical.industrialization,Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS,17,279-291.
8. Dunning, J. H.(1997).Alliance Capitalism and Global Business.London:Routledge.
9. Dunning, J. H.(1995).Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism.Journal of International Business Studies,26(3),461-491.
10. Dunning, J. H.(1980).International Production and the Multinational Enterprise.London:UK:Allen & Unwin.
11. Dunning, J. H.(1980).Towards an eclectic theory of international production:Some empirical tests.Journal ofInternational Business Studies,19(1),9-31.
12. Gereffi, G.,Korzeniewicz, M. (eds.)(1994).Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism.NewYork:Praeger.
13. Gertler, M. S.(2001).Best practice?Geography,learning and the institutional limits to strong Convergence.Journal of Economic Geography,1(1),5-26.
14. Grabher, G.(1993).The Embedded Firm: on the social-Economics of Industrial Networks.London:Routledge.
15. Granovetter, M.(1985).Economic action and economic structure:the problem of embeddedness.American Journal ofSociology,91,481-510.
16. Hess, M.(2004).‘Spatial'relationship?Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness.Progress in Human Geography,28(2),165-186.
17. Hsing, Y. T.,G. Grabher (edited)(1998).Making Capitalism in China: The Taiwan Connection.New York:Oxford University Press.
18. Hymer, S. H.(1975).The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment.Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press.
19. Johanson, J.,Mattsson, L. G.,Hood, N. (edited),Vahlne, J. E.(1987).Strategies in Global Competition.London:Routledge.
20. Lovering, I.(1990).Fordism's unknown successor:a comment on Scott's theory of flexible accumulation and the re-emergence of regional economies.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,14(1),159-174.
21. Lovering, J.(1991).Theorizing postfordism:Why contingency matters (a further response to Scott).International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,15(2),298-301.
22. Martin, R.(2000).A Companion to Economic Geography.T.J.Oxford:Blackwell.
23. McKendrick, D .G.,Doner, R. F.,Haggard, S.(2000).From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
24. Murdoch, J.,Marsden, T.(1995).The spatialization of politics:local and national actor-spaces in environmental conflict.Transaction of Institute of British Geographers NS,20,368-380.
25. Nohria, N.,Carlos, G. P.(1991).Global strategic linkages and industrial structure.Strategic Management Journal,12,105-124.
26. Peck, J.(2005).Economic sociologies in space.Economic Geography.
27. Sabel, C.,Sheppard, E. (edited),Barnes(1989).Reversing Industrial Decline?.New York:St.Martin's press.
28. Scott, A. J.(1991).Flexible production systems: analytical tasks and theoretical horizons—a reply to Lovering.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,15(1),130-134.
29. Scott, A. J.(1988).Flexible production systems and regional development;the rise of new industrial spaces North America and Western Europe.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,12(2),171-186.
30. Smart, A.(2000).China's Regions, Polity, & Economy: a Study of Spatial Transformation in the Post-reform Era.Hong Kong:Chinese University Press.
31. Storper, M.(1997).The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy.NewYork:Guilford Press.
32. Yang, Y. R.,Hsia, C.-J.(2005).Spatial clustering and organizational dynamics of trans-border production networks: a case study of Taiwanese IT companies in the Greater Suzhou Area,China.Environment and Planning A.
33. Zukin, S.,DiMaggio, P.(1990).Structure ojCapital: the Social Organization of the Economy.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
34. 楊友仁(2005)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。
35. 楊友仁、夏鑄九(2004)。跨界生產網絡的在地化聚集與組織治理模式:以大蘇州地區資訊電子業台商為例。地理學報，36，23-54。

1. 柏蘭芝(2008)。空間規劃和區域整合的政治：對珠江三角洲城市化戰略的反思。臺灣社會研究季刊，70，121-164。
2. 邊泰明、林淑雯(2012)。兩岸區域環境對臺灣製造業廠商研發區位選擇影響之研究。臺灣土地研究，15(1)，95-125。
3. 陳均泓、金家禾(2008)。市場驅動之建築陶瓷材料產業跨兩岸生產網絡。台灣土地研究，11(1)，169-196。
4. 洪冬力(2015)。非互惠優惠貿易協定與廠商跨界制度互動年興紡織對美國 AGOA 法案的遊說。地理學報，77，83-105。
5. 彭立沛,巫宜庭(2021)。Assessing Multiple Stakeholders' Collaborative Network in Promoting Eco-agriculture。台灣水利，69(1)，20-41。
6. 蘇一志、楊友仁(2010)。不僅僅是模組化：台灣資訊電子業ODM製造商的研發地理學研究。臺灣社會研究季刊，79，51-89。
7. 閻永祺、孔憲法(2014)。產業水平空間群聚型態與其空間結構之辨識：以台灣製造業為例。都市與計劃，41(2)，117-148。
8. 閻永祺、王惠汝、孔憲法(2011)。產業空間群聚機制之解析─以楠梓加工出口區IC 封測群聚為例。亞太經濟管理評論，14(2)，1-30。
9. 楊友仁(2007)。產業網絡之領域化與組織治理的對話：以PC產業台商跨界生產網絡為例。建築與城鄉研究學報，14，15-30。
10. 楊友仁、王鴻楷(2006)。中國大陸地方土地產權體制的形構與演化：東莞地區案例。臺灣社會研究季刊，63，53-93。
11. (2006)。政治脈絡中的創意專案網絡兩岸跨界演唱會案例研究。地理學報，46，73-103。