台北市主觀生活品質之衡量

Subjective Quality of Life Measurement in Taipei City

10.6128/CP.32.4.387

李永展(Yung-Jaan Lee)；吳孟芳(Meng-Fang Wu)

生活品質 ； 滿意度 ； 線性結構關係模式 ； 台北市 ； Quality of life ； Satisfaction ； LISREL ； Taipei city

都市與計劃

32卷4期（2005 / 12 / 01）

387 - 420

繁體中文

透過生活品質的衡量可為地區及城市進行生活環境診斷並檢討過去的施政策略，以提供未來空間及都市規劃制定生活品質相關政策之參考。本文首先回顧客觀及主觀衡量的生活品質之相關文獻，然後以美國進行五十多年並在世界各國城市進行跨國比較的「底特律地區研究」為基礎，針對台北市的人文社經及地理環境特性進行修改後，以台北市十二個行政區進行實證研究，調查331位台北市民實際生活品質之感受，並使用線性結構關係模式分析台北市主觀生活品質之間的因果關係。本文發現行政區別、婚姻、年齡、學歷、收入的個人特質會影響各領域的滿意程度；使用線性結構關係模式分析台北市生活品質關係模式，其驗證結果模式適合度良好，其中，主要影響滿意度的因素是安全評價、市政服務評價，其次為鄰里關係和社區評價；而鄰里環境評價和鄰里認同則影響力小或不具影響。由此可知，居民最關心的是自身的安全和市政服務，也是影響台北市生活品質最重要的因素。

Quality of Life (QOL) measurement can be applied as an environmental diagnosis of policy strategies and is the foundation for drafting future spatial and urban planning policies. This study first conducts a review of QOL literature. The extensively adopted Detroit Area Study (DAS), used as the basic theoretical structure in this study, is modified to meet Taipei's social, cultural and geographical contexts. A field survey of 331 Taipei residents is performed to determine residents' subjective measurements of their QOL. A Linear Structure Relation (LISREL) analysis is performed to investigate the causal relationships among QOL variables. Survey results indicate that districts, marriage, age, education, and income affect various satisfaction domains. The goodness of fit of the LISREL is acceptable. Survey results of the LISREL model suggest that the principal factors influencing satisfaction are safety evaluation, public service evaluation, neighborhood relationships and community evaluation. However, the influence of neighborhood environmental evaluation and neighborhood attachments is trivial, almost irrelevant. Restated, respondents are most concerned with personal safety and public services, which are also the principal factors affecting Taipei's QOL.

1. Andrews, F. M.,Inglehart, R.(1979).The structure of subjective well-being in nine western societies.Social Indicators Research,6,73-90.
2. Bonaiuto, M.,Fornara, F.,Bonnes, M.(2003).Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments: a confirmation study on the city of Rome.Landscape and Urban Planning,65,41-52.
3. Camagni, R.,Capello, R.,Nijkamp, P.(1997).Towards sustainable city policy: an economy-environment technology Nexus.Ecological Economics,24(1),103-118.
4. Campbell, A.,Converse, P.,Rodgers, W.(1976).Evaluations and Satisfactions.New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
5. Campbell, S.(1996).Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development.Journal of the American Planning Association,62(2),21-33.
6. Cheung, C.(1997).Toward a theoretically based measurement model of the good life.Journal of Genet Psychology,158(2),200-215.
7. Connerly, C.,Marans, R. W.(1985).Comparing global measures of perceived neighborhood quality.Social Indicators Research,17,29-47.
8. Connerly, C.,Marans, R. W.,E. Huttman(edited),W. van Vliet(1988).The U.S. Handbook on Housing and the Built Environment.Westwood, CO:Greenwood Press.
9. Couper, M.,Clemens, J.,Powers, K.(2002).Detroit Area Study: Celebrating 50 Years.Ann Arbor, MI:Department of Sociology, The University of Michigan.
10. Cummins, R. A.(1985).Objective and subjective quality of life: an interactive model.Social Indicators Research,52,55-72.
11. Dahmann, D. C.(1985).Assessments of neighborhood quality in Metropolitan America.Urban Affairs Quarterly,20(4),511-535.
12. de Hollander, A. E. M.,Staatsen, B. A. M.(2003).Health, environment and quality of life: an epidemiological perspective on urban development.Landscape and Urban Planning,65,53-62.
13. Fernandez, R. M.,Kulik, J. C.(1981).A multi level model of life satisfaction: effect of individual characteristic's and neighborhood composition.American Sociological Review,46,840-850.
14. Godschalk, D. R.(2004).Land use challenge: coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities.Journal of the American Planning Association,70(1),5-13.
15. Kahneman, D.,Deiner, D.,Schwarz, N. (eds.)(1999).Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology.New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
16. Lee, T.,Marans, R. W.(1980).Objective and subjective indicators: scale discordance on interrelationships.Social Indicators Research,6,47-64.
17. Lee, Y. -J.(1995).Antecedents of conservation behavior in the workplace.Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Build Environment,10,331-352.
18. Lee, Y. -J.,Young, R. D.,Marans, R. W.(1995).Factors influencing individual recycling behavior in office setting: a study of office workers in Taiwan.Environment and Behavior,27(3),380-430.
19. MacCallum, R. C.,Austin, J. T.(2000).Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.Annual Review ofPsychology,51,201-226.
20. Marans, R. W.(2003).Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators.Landscape and Urban Planning,65,73-83.
21. Marans, R. W.,Couper, M.(2000).Measuring the quality of community life: a program of longitudinal and comparative international research.Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Quality of Life in Cities
22. Marans, R. W.,Mohai, P.,B. L. (edited),Driver, P. Brown,G. L. Peterson(1991).Benefits of Leisure.State College, PA:Venture.
23. Marans, R. W.,Rodgers, W.,A. Hawley(edited),S. M. Mazie(1975).In Nonmetropolitan America in Transition.Chapel Hill, NC:University of North Carolina Press.
24. Mitchell, G.,Namdeo, A.,Kay, D.(2002).A new disease-burden method for estimating the impact of outdoor air quality on human health.The Science of The Total Environment,246(2-3),153-163.
25. Musschenga, A. W.(1997).The relation between concepts of quality-of-life, health and happiness.Journal of Medicine and Philosophy,22,11-29.
26. Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM)(2004).Skills for Sustainable Communities.London:ODPM.
27. Pacione, M.(1982).The use of objective and subjective measures of life quality in human geography.Progress in Human Geography,6,493-514.
28. Rogerson, R. J.(1999).Quality of life and city competitiveness.Urban Studies,36(5-6),969-985.
29. Schwarz, N.,track, F.,D. Kahneman (edited),D. Deiner,N. Schwarz(1999).Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology.New York:Russell Sage oundation.
30. Seik, F. T.(2000).Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapore (1997-1998).Habitat International,24,31-49.
31. Shafer, C. S.,Lee, B. K.,Turner, S.(2000).A tale of three green way trails: user perceptions related to quality of life.Landscape and Urban Planning,49,163-178.
32. Spain, D.(1988).The effect of changing household composition on neighborhood satisfaction.Urban Affairs Quarterly,23(4),581-600.
33. Szalai A.,A.Szalai (edited),F. Andrews(1980).The Quality of Life.CA:Sage Beverly Hills.
34. Ülengin, B.,Ülengin, F.,Guvenc, U.(2001).A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: the case of Istanbul.European Journal of Operational Research,130,361-374.
35. van Kamp, I.,Leidelmeijer, K.,Marsmana, G.,de Hollander, A. E. M.(2003).Urban environmental quality and human well-being towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: a literature study.Landscape and Urban Planning,65,5-18.
36. Warr, P. B.(1987).Unemployment, and Mental Health.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
37. Warr, P. B.,by D. Kahnernan(edited),E. Deiner,,N. Schwarz(1999).In Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology.New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
38. Wish, N. B.(1986).Are we really measuring the quality of life? Well-being has subjective dimensions, as well as objective ones.American Journal of Economics and Sociology,45(1),93-99.
39. World Health Organization (WHO)(1999).WHOQOL: Annotated Bibliography.Geneva:WHO.
40. Zhu, J.(2001).Multidimensional quality-of-life measure with an application to fortune's best cties.Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,35,263-284.
41. 伊慶春(1985)。都市社會網絡與地緣關係之研究一以台北市爲例，探討都會區社區發展方向與社區組織系統。台北:中華民國社區發展研究訓練中心。
42. 李永展。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告（計畫編號:NSC83-0301-H004-108）行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告（計畫編號:NSC83-0301-H004-108）,未出版
43. 林欣薇(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學地政學研究所。
44. 林素穗(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。立德管理學院地區發展及管理研究所。
45. 施敏雄、蕭新煌(1981)。我國社會指標的回顧與檢討。台灣經濟，50，36-44。
46. 紀素菁(1991)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中興大學都市計劃研究所。
47. 孫明爲(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學都市計劃系。
48. 張紹勳(2001)。研究方法。台中:滄海書局。
49. 陳宜音(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系。
50. 陳柏熹、王文中(1999)。生活品質量表的發展。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，46(1)，57-74。
51. 陸玓玲(1998)。台灣地區生活品質研究概況。中華公共衛生雜誌，17(6)，442-457。
52. 曾敏傑(2002)。台灣主客觀生活品質變遷的探索。輔仁學誌一法／管理學院之部，35，23-50。
53. 黃芳銘(2002)。結構方程模式理論與應用。台北:五南圖書。
54. 董娟鳴(2005)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立政治大學地政學系。
55. 熊瑞梅、章英華編、傅仰止編、盟海源編(1995)。社會調查與分析：社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻之一。中央研究院民族學研究所。
56. 蕭新煌(1997)。構築一個『好社會』的願景－綜合解讀1996台灣社會指標。中國統計通訊，8，24-30。
57. 薛立敏、錢玉蘭(1996)。生活品質與國家競爭力。經濟前瞻，48，20-63。
58. 簡宏懋(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所。
59. 羅浩杰(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究。

1. Su, Ying-Ming(2014).Sustainable Urban Development for Commercial and Residential Areas: A Case Study of Paradoxical Mixed Land Use in the Taipei Shida Area, Taiwan.建築學報,88(S),17-31.
2. 劉素珍、黃源協、莊俐晰(2015)。社區能力與社區生活品質之研究：對社區治理與社區發展的意涵。公共行政學報，49，1-35。
3. (2008)。優質都市品質診斷系統之研究。土地經濟年刊，19，135-159。
4. (2012)。從「成長」到「發展」─營造有感的幸福社區。社區發展季刊，138，21-33。
5. (2012)。都市居住環境品質認知與居民生活品質關係之研究。造園景觀學報，18(3)，63-90。
6. (2012)。綠地結構與居住環境品質對生活滿意度之影響。造園景觀學報，18(3)，21-41。
7. (2016)。社區發展對社區居民生活品質影響之研究─臺灣的實證研究分析。社區發展季刊，154，148-164。