應用融入性規劃理論於國際村社區規劃：中部科學工業園區台中基地之國際村社區規劃案例分析

Inclusiveness in International Community Planning: A Case Study of the Taichung Base of the Central Taiwan Science Based Industry Park

10.6128/CP.33.4.261

王大立(Dah-Lih Wang)；劉曜華(Thomas Yaw-Hwa Liou)；蔡育新(Yu-Hsin Tsai)；邱景升(Ching-Sheng Chiu)

融入性 ； 國際村社區規劃 ； 中部科學工業園區台中基地 ； Inclusiveness ； International community planning ； The central Taiwan science based industry park-Taichung base

都市與計劃

33卷4期（2006 / 12 / 01）

261 - 276

繁體中文

全球化不單是資金和資訊的流通，也是人才和勞動人力的跨國流通。然而，面對人才的流通和居留課題，多數在地性的都市計劃實務都沒有相對應的整體策略。觀察近年來台灣地區科學工業園區的開發，引進大量國外高科技人才，由於文化、語言和生活習慣等差異外，國際人士因未具有公民身分，並無法納入現行的都市計畫體制。此外，爲提供國際人士的良好的生活環境，政府也提出建構國際村社區的政策。因此，針對科學工業園區所具有的多元文化特質，並配合政府的國際村社區政策，本研究提出應用「融入性」作為規劃的理論基礎，並以中部科學工業園區台中基地為例，說明從事國際村社區規劃時應有的做法，預期中部科學工業園區台中基地國際村社區的設置，不但能提供在園區工作的國際人士良好的生活環境，並能作為台中都會區與國際接軌的窗口。

Globalization implies the free flow of capital, information and professional workers and their families across national boundaries. The rapid development of science based industry parks in Taiwan requires large numbers of overseas hi-tech experts. Owing to these experts lacking citizenship, as well as their differences from Taiwanese in terms of cultural background, language and lifestyle, their needs are generally not well catered for by the current urban planning practice. To make Taiwan more attractive to overseas experts, the Taiwanese government has proposed of establishing so-called international communities to accommodate them. Therefore, it is planned to create such an international community in the Taichung Base of the Central Taiwan Science Based Industry Park. By applying inclusiveness planning to its international community planning, the intentions of this community are to provide a suitable living environment for foreign experts and to establish a gateway for the Taichung Metropolitan Area to connect to the global city network.

1. Ameyaw, S.,M. A. Burayidi(edited)(2000).Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society.Westport, CT:Praeger.
2. Au, W.(2000).Planning amidst diversity: multicultural challenges and strategies in Vancouver.Plan Canada,404,21-22.
3. Bernstein, S.(1997).Community-based regionalism key for sustainable future.The Neighborhood Works,20,10.
4. Bernstein, S.(1999).Learning to do it together.paper prepared for Bridging the Divide-Making Regions Work for Everyone Conference,Washington, DC:
5. Burayidi, M.(ed.)(2000).Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society.Westport, CT:Praeger.
6. Castles, S.,Miller, M. J.(1998).The Age of Migration.New York:The Guilford Press.
7. de Souza Briggs, X.(2002).Community Building: The New (and Old) Politics of Urban Problem-Solving.KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series, No: RWPOZ003.
8. Dickout, L.(2004).The Quest to Negotiate Equitable Civic Engagement.RIIM Working Paper Series No. 04-17.
9. Diken, B.,P. Seeberg(edited)(1997).The Multicultural Neighborhood.Copenhagen:NAVNET FOR ETNISK LIGESTILLING.
10. Dodge, W.(1996).Regional Excellence: Governing Together to Compete Globally and Flourish Locally.Washington, DC:National League of Cities.
11. Dreier, P.(1996).Community empowerment strategies: the limits and potential of community organizing in urban neighborhoods.Cityscape,2,121-159.
12. Foster-Bey, J.(1997).Bridging communities: making the link between regional economies and local community economic development.Stanford Law and Policy Review,8,25-45.
13. Friedmann, J.(1995).The right to the city, Society and Nature,1,71-84.
14. Friedmann, J.(2002).The Prospect of Cities.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
15. Guo, S.(2004).Responding to the Changing Needs of the Chinese Community in Vancouver: The Contribution of SUCCESS (1973-1998).RIIM Working Paper Series No. 04-08.
16. Han, S. M.(2004).From the communitarian ideal to the public sphere: the making of foreigners' assemblies in Kawasaki and Kanagawa prefecture.Social Science Japan Journal,7,41-60.
17. Holston, J.,L. Sandercock(edited)(1998).Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History.Berkeley:University of California Press.
18. Honig, B.(2001).Democracy and the Foreigner.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
19. Isin, E.,E. Isin(edited)(2000).Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City.New York:Rougledge.
20. Jacobs, J. M.(1996).Edge of Empire: Postcolonialism and the City.London:Routledge.
21. Jargowsky, P. A.(1997).Metropolitan restructuring and urban policy.Stanford Law and Policy Review,8,47-60.
22. King. A. D.(1976).Colonial Urban Development: Culture, Social Power, and Environment.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
23. Lefebvre, H.(1996).Writings on Cities.Cambridge, MA:Blackwell.
24. Lepofsky, J.,Fraser, J. C.(2003).Building community citizens: claiming the right to place-making in the city.Urban Studies,40,127-142.
25. Luria, D. D.,Rogers, J.(1999).Metro Futures.Boston:Beacon Press.
26. MacDougall, T.(2001).Towards Political Inclusiveness: The Changing Role of Local Government in Japan.Washington, DC:World Bank Institute.
27. Nowak, J.(1997).Neighborhood initiative and the regional economy.Economic Development Quarterly,11,3-10.
28. Pastor, M.,Benner, C.,Rosner, R.,Matsuoka, M.,Jacobs, J.(2004).Community Based Regionalism.Santa Cruz:Center for Justice, Tolerance, and Community University of California.
29. Pastor, M.,Grigsby III, J. E.,Dreier, P.,López-Garza, M.(1997).Growing Together: Linking Regional and Community Development in a Changing Economy.Los Angles:Occidental College.
30. PolicyLink(2000).Community-based Regionalism: California Convening.Okland, CA:Policy Link.
31. Qadeer, M. A.(2000).Urban planning and multiculturalism: beyond sensitivity.Plan Canada,403,437.
32. Qadeer, M. A.(1997).Urban planning for multicultural cities.Journal of the American Planning Association,63,481-494.
33. Rose, N.,E. F. Isin(edited)(2000).Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City.London:Routledge.
34. Rusk, D.(1995).Cities Without Suburbs.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
35. Rusk, D.(1999).Inside Game, Outside Game: Winning Strategies for Saving Urban America.Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press.
36. Sandercock, L.(2003).Rethinking Multiculturalism for the 21st Century.RIIM Working Paper Series No. 03-14.
37. Sandercock, L.(2003).Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities in the Twenty-first Century.London:Continuum.
38. Sandercock, L.(2000).When strangers become neighbours: managing cities of difference.Planning Theory and Practice,1,13-30.
39. Sandercock, L.(1998).Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities.London:John Wiley & Sons.
40. Saxenian, A.(2002).Transnational communities and the evolution of global production networks: the cases of Taiwan, China and India.Industry and Innovation,9,183-202.
41. Saxenian, A.,Hsu, J. Y.(2001).The silicon valley-Hsinchu connection: technical communities and industrial upgrading.Industrial and Corporate Change,10,893-920.
42. Scott, A. J.,Agnew, J.,Soja, E. W.,Storper, M.,A. J. Scott(edited)(2001).Global city-regions, in Global City-Regions.London:Oxford University Press.
43. Scotti, R.(2000).Access, equity, civic participation and municipal government: a Toronto perspective.paper presented at 4th National Metropolis Conference,Toronto:
44. Soja, E.(2000).Postmetropolis.Malden, MA:Blackwell.
45. 台美加科技簡訊
46. 台中市政府(2004)。台中市政府委託研究計畫台中市政府委託研究計畫,未出版
47. 交通部觀光局(2003)。觀光年報。台北:觀光局。
48. 行政院國家科學委員會(2002)。中部科學工業園區台中基地籌設計畫書。
49. 行政院經濟建設委員會(2003)。推動國際村社區方案。
50. 警政統計年報
51. 監察院(2002)。監察院調查報告。