地方連結、國際接軌：真實事件參與、校際競爭合作、與跨國互動學習的規劃教育實驗與初步實踐

Local Connection and International Participation: A Teaching Experiment and Preliminary Practice on Real-World Problem-Solving, Intercollegiate Competition and Collaboration, and Transnational Interac

10.6128/CP.34.4.363

劉立偉(Li-Wei Liu)

規劃教育 ； 核心課程 ； 科目設計 ； 都市計畫實習 ； 問題導向的學習 ； 真實事件參與 ； 校際競爭合作 ； 跨國互動學習 ； 規劃實踐再生產 ； Planning education ； Core curriculum ； Course design ； Urban planning lab./workshop ； Problem-based learning ； Real-world problem-solving ； Intercollegiate competition and collaboration ； Transnational interactive

都市與計劃

34卷4期（2007 / 12 / 01）

363 - 383

繁體中文

具有百年歷史的現代規劃教育正面臨一個範型移轉且需要再評估的挑戰，但就國內的規劃教育發展而言，規劃科目設計的不足而非僅是整體核心課程的調整應被視為重要的議題。本文描述作者於逢甲大學都市計畫學系針對大學部「都市計畫實習（四）、（五）」、「建築計畫與設計」、「城鄉風貌設計與模擬」以及研究所「都市發展比較分析」等科目所進行大約五個學期的教學實驗，試圖將問題導向的學習、真實事件參與、校際競爭合作、與跨國互動學習的操作模式導入教學。實驗的成效透過參與學生問卷調查的分析評估進行調整，並從95學年度起陸續將實驗的規劃科目導向常態性的教學。在教學實驗與初步實踐過程中，真實事件的參與有效激發學生學習動機以及與地方的連結，跨國互動學習則有助開啟學生與世界接軌的契機；此外亦發現學校師生教與學的成果轉化為規劃實務的「中間產品」，具有規劃實踐再生產的功能。

Modern planning education with a history of nearly 100 years is now in a condition of reappraisal and calls for a paradigm shift. As regards to planning education in Taiwan, not only the review of comprehensive core curricula but also the insufficiency in the course design deserves our attention. This paper documents a five-semester teaching experiment conducted by the author in the Department of Urban Planning at Feng Chia University, which includes four undergraduate courses and one graduate course. They are Urban Planning Lab. (4), Urban Planning Lab. (5), Architectural Design and Planning, Townscape Design and Simulation, and Comparative Analysis of Urban Development. Pedagogical approaches of problem-based learning, real-world problem-solving, intercollegiate competition and collaboration, and transnational interactive learning are introduced into these courses. Beginning in School Year 2006, the questionnaire survey resulted in the evaluation of the above-mentioned experiments, putting the experimental pedagogy into practice. The experiments have also showed that the real-world problem-solving mode of planning education promoted students' learning incentives and local connection, and the transnational interactive learning provided students with vital global connection. In addition, this research creates a reproduction process transforming the course work into the intermediate product in planning practice.

1. 周志龍(2004)。台灣新都市主義與都市規劃的挑戰。都市與計劃，31(3)，195-213。
   連結：
2. 徐進鈺、鄭陸霖(2001)。全球在地化的地理學：跨界組織場域的統理。都市與計劃，28(4)，391-411。
   連結：
3. Abbott, J.(2005).Understanding and managing the unknown: The nature of uncertainty in planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research,24(3),237-251.
4. Alterman, R.(1992).A transatlantic view of planning education and professional practice.Journal of Planning Education and Research,12(1),39-54.
5. Amirahmadi, H.(1993).Globalization and planning education.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,20(5),537-555.
6. Amirahmadi, H.,Sanyal B. (ed.)(1990).Breaking the Boundaries: A One-World Approach to Planning Education.New York:Plenum Press.
7. Chang, I. C.(1999).A multimedia world wide web based conference minute system for group collaboration.Multimedia Tools and Applications,9(3),199-226.
8. Feldman, M. M .A.(1994).Perloff revisited: Reassessing planning education in postmodern times.Journal of Planning Education and Research,13(2),89-103.
9. Fowler IV, T.,Muller, B.(2004).Establishing a physical-digital media framework using Bauhaus principles for integrating building technology into studio design projects.Chaoyang Journal of Design,5,77-88.
10. Friedmann, J.(1994).The utility of non-euclidean planning.Journal of the American Planning Association,60(3),377-379.
11. Friedmann, J.(1996).The core curriculum in planning revisited.Journal of Planning Education and Research,15(2),89-104.
12. 100 years of planning education in North America
13. Friedmann, J.(1993).Toward a non-euclidian mode of planning.Journal of the American Planning Association,59(4),482-485.
14. Galloway, T.(1992).Threatened schools, imperiled practice: A case for collaboration.Journal of the American Planning Association,58(2),229-234.
15. Garcia, R. B.(1993).Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.University of Pennsylvania.
16. Goldstein, H. A.,Bollens, S.,Feser, E.,Silver, C.(2006).An experiment in the internationalization of planning education: The NEURUS program.Journal of Planning Education and Research,25(4),349-363.
17. Hall, P.(2002).Cities of Tomorrow.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
18. Lang, J.(1983).Teaching planning to city planning students: An argument for the studio/workshop approach.Journal of Planning Education and Research,2(2),122-129.
19. Lim, G. C.(1993).Reforming education toward the global century.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,20(5),567-576.
20. Liu, L. W.(2007).From Hardship to Pleasant Hardship: A Case Study of Competitive, Collaborative, and Real-World Approaches to Urban Planning Lab.paper presented in The 4th International Conference on Planning and Design,Tainan:
21. Marris, P.(1987).Meaning and Action: Community Planning and Conceptions of Change.London, UK:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
22. Navarro, P.(2000).Economics in the cyberclassroom.Journal of Economic Perspectives,14(2),119-132.
23. Orlick, S. C.(1993).Justifying the value of a formal planning education.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,20(5),499-510.
24. Perloff, H. S.(1957).Education for Planning: City, State, and Regional.Baltimore, Maryland:The John Hopkins University Press.
25. Poxon, J.(2001).Shaping the planning profession of the future: The role of planning education.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,28(4),563-580.
26. Rodriguez, S.(1993).Schools for today, graduates for tomorrow.Journal of the American Planning Association,59(2),152-155.
27. Shepherd, A.,Cosgriff, B.(1998).Problem-based learning: A bridge between planning education and planning practice.Journal of Planning Education and Research,17(4),348-357.
28. Teitz, M.(1988).Planning education as a vocation.Journal of Planning Education and Research,7(1),79-83.
29. Violich, F.(2001).Intellectual Evolution in the Field of City and Regional Planning: A Personal Perspective Toward Holistic Planning Education 1937-2010.Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
30. Zinn, F. D.,Lyons, T. S.,Hinojosa, R. C.(1993).Bringing a global approach to education: The case of urban planning.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,20(5),557-565.
31. 王紀鯤(1998)。建築教育中的設計工作室－以淡江大學建築系為例。Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering，1，39-48。
32. 王聖銘、鄭承昌、謝昆霖(2004)。以寬頻學術網路視訊會議開設國際通識講座的發展與應用。通識教育年刊，4，71-98。
33. 王濟昌(1986)。台灣地區都市計畫教育發展與人力運用。光復四十年來台灣地區都市計畫之回顧與展望－中華民國都市計劃學會第十二次會員大會研討論文集，台北:
34. 江日順(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。逢甲大學建築及都市計畫研究所。
35. 李瑞麟(1990)。都市計劃教育目標與課程的檢討研究。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
36. 李瑞麟(1986)。都市計畫專業人才培育方向－美英規劃教育經驗與發展方向。都市計畫專業制度建立研討會論文集，台南:
37. 李瑞麟(1987)。都市計劃專業性質的調查研究。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
38. 周志龍(1997)。英國現代城鄉規劃思潮與專業教育的再結構。歐美研究，27(3)，179-228。
39. 周崇琦(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。
40. 傅約翰、黃肇新譯(1998)。新的規劃政治經濟學，市民社會之崛起。城市與設計學報，4，1-20。
41. 趙美聲(1999)。即時群播遠距教學所面臨的瓶頸與因應策略初探。隔空教育論叢，11，33-62。
42. 劉曜華(1998)。台灣都市計畫教育的未來：以美國都市計畫教育思潮演變的經驗為例。逢甲學報，34，19-34。
43. 蔡勳雄、施鴻志(1986)。都市計畫之學校教育方向。都市計畫專業制度建立研討會論文集，台南:
44. 賴美蓉(2003)。都市計劃教育改革起步走—2003年都市計劃教育論壇實錄。台北: