大專都市規劃與工程領域教師選用地理資訊系統行為特性分析

Behavioral Analysis of GIS Adoption for College Teachers in Urban Planning and Engineering

10.6128/CP.35.4.291

張學聖(Hsueh-Sheng Chang)；黃惠愉(Hui-Yu Huang)

地理資訊系統 ； 地理空間技術 ； 技術接受模式 ； 結構方程模式 ； Geographic information system ； Geospatial technology ； Technology acceptance model ； Structural equation modeling

都市與計劃

35卷4期（2008 / 12 / 01）

291 - 311

繁體中文

地理資訊系統乃不同領域地理空間技術整合應用之重要工具，其亦爲空間規劃等相關領域教師進行規劃與研究之重要利器。然而教師在實際使用此系統工具時，卻亦可能受限於數值資料、電腦技術等原因，而導致此工具使用之限制。如何找出影響使用者是否選擇使用此工具的主要原因，以提高其更普遍性之應用，爲本文主要關注的焦點。本文嘗試使用技術接受模式爲分析基礎，運用感覺有用性與感覺易用性等構面，提出一個整合性系統分析架構。研究中以空間規劃相關學系的大專教師爲對象進行抽樣調查，並透過結構方程模式進行資料處理與分析，來探究影響教師採用地理資訊系統之行爲特性。研究結果顯示，「感覺有用性」與「感覺易用性」影響效果相近，同樣主導教師採用之行爲。而「外部控制感知」則是影響因素中最重要者，此說明大專教師個人主觀認知其對地理資訊系統之使用能力，對其採用行爲影響最大。而對教師而言，電腦操作焦慮則對採用行爲影響並不顯著。

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is an important tool geospatial technology for instructors teaching in spatial planning-related fields. However, GIS can be adversely affected by factors associated with digital data and computer technology. The focus of this study is to identify the main factors influencing whether teachers use GIS. This study employs the technology acceptance model as its analytical foundation and applies the dimensions of ”perceived usefulness” and ”perceived ease of use” in proposing an analytical framework for an integrated system. This study surveys college instructors teaching in spatial planning-related departments to explore the behavioral characteristics that influence teacher use of GIS via structural equation modeling for data processing and analysis. The results have shown that ”perceived usefulness” and ”perceived ease of use” have similar effects on the adoption behavior of teachers, and ”system practicability” has the greatest effect. It indicates that recognition by college teachers of the capability of GIS has the largest influence on adoption behavior. For college teachers, computer operational anxiety has little impact on adoption behavior.

1. Adams, D. A.,Nelson, R. R.,Todd, P. A.(1992).Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology, a replication.MIS Quarterly,16(2),227-247.
2. Ajzen, I.,Fishbein, M.(1980).Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior.New York:Prentice-Hall.
3. Ajzen, I.,Kuhl, J.,Beckman, J. (ed.)(1985).Action Control: From Congnitions to Behaviour.New York:Springer-Verlan.
4. Bajaj, A.,Nidumolu, S. R.(1998).A feedback model to understand information system usage.Information & Management,33(4),213-224.
5. Batty, M.(1994).A chronicle of scientific planning: The anglo-american modeling experience.Journal of the American Planning Association,60(1),7-16.
6. Bracken, I.(1993).An extensive surface model database for population-related information: Concept and application.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,20(1),13-27.
7. Campagna, M.,Deplano, G.(2004).Evaluating geographic information provision within public administration websites.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,31(1),21-37.
8. Cheng, J. M. S.,Sheen G. J.,Lou, G. C.(2006).Consumer acceptance of the internet as a channel of distribution in Taiwan-a channel function perspective.Technovation,26(7),856-864.
9. Compeau, D. R.,Higgins, C. A.(1995).Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test.MIS Quarterly,19(2),189-211.
10. Davis, F. D.(1989).Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.MIS Quarterly,13(3),319-340.
11. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R. P.,Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User acceptance of computertechnology-A comparison of 2 theretical-models.Management Science,35(8),982-1003.
12. Davis, G. B.,Olson, M. H.(1985).Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development.Singapore:McGraw-Hall.
13. Elias, G. C.,Eric, T.(2006).Innovation diffusion and technology acceptance: The case of PKI technology.Technovation,26,847-855.
14. Geertman, S.(2002).Participatory planning and GIS: A PSS to bridge the gap.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,29(1),21-35.
15. Geertman, S.,Stillwell, J. E.(2003).Planning Support Systems in Practice.Berlin:Springer Verlag.
16. Heinssen, R. K. J.,Glass, C. R.,Knight, L. A.(1987).Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale.Computers in human behavior,3(1),49-59.
17. Igbaria, M.,Guimaraes, T.,Davis G. B.(1995).Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model.Journal of Management Information Systems,11(4),87-114.
18. Igbaria, M.,Zinatelli, N.,Cragg, P.,Cavage, A. L. M.(1997).Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model.MIS Quarterly,21(3),179-305.
19. Jackson, C. M.,Chow S.,Leitch R. A.(1997).Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system.Decision Sciences,28(2),357-389.
20. Karahanna, E.,Straub, D. W.(1999).The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use.Information & Management,35(4),237-250.
21. Klosterman, E. R.,Brail, R. K.,Bossard, E. G.(1994).Spreadsheet Models for Urban and Regional Analysis, Rutges.New Brunswick, Rutges:the state University of New Jersey Center for Urban Policy Research.
22. Klosterman, R. E.(2001).Planning Support Systems, Integrating Geographical Information Systems Models and Visualization Tools.Redlands:ESRI Press.
23. Lederer, L. A.,Maupin, J. D.,Sena, P. M.,Zhuang Y.(2000).The technology acceptance model and the world wide web.Decision Support Systems,29(2),269-282.
24. Lin J. C. C.,Lu, H.(2000).Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a web site.International Journal of Information Management,20(2),197-208.
25. Luarn, P.,Lin, H. H.(2005).Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking.Computer in Human Behavior,21(2),873-891.
26. Mathieson, K.(1991).Predicting user intention: comparing the technology acceptance model with theory of planned behavior.Information Systems Research,2(3),173-191.
27. Methieson, K.,Peacock E.,Chin, W.(2001).Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources.DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems,32(3),86-112.
28. Morris, M. G.,Dillon, A.(1997).How user perceptions influence software use.IEEE Software,14(4),58-65.
29. Mun, Y. Y.,Jackson, J. D.,Park, J. S.,Probst, J. C.(2006).Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view.Information & Management,43(3),350-363.
30. Paul, J. H.,Theodore, H. K.(2003).Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study.Information & Management,41(2),227-241.
31. Shen, Q.(1994).An application of GIS to the measurement of spatial autocorrelation.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,18(3),167-191.
32. Shih, H. P.(2004).Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior.Information & Management,41(6),719-729.
33. Straub, D.,Limayem, M.,Karahanna, E. E.(1995).Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing.Management Science,41(8),1328-1342.
34. Subramanian, G. H.(1994).A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of measurement.Decision Sciences,25(5/6),863-874.
35. Szajna, B.(1996).Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model.Management Science,42(1),85-92.
36. Taylor, S.,Todd, P. A.(1995).Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience.Management Information Systems Quarterly,19(4),561-570.
37. Venkatesh, V.(2000).Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model.Information Systems Research,11(4),342-365.
38. Venkatesh, V.(1999).Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation.MIS Quarterly,23(2),239-260.
39. Venkatesh, V.,Davis, F. D.(1996).A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test.Decision Sciences,27(3),451-481.
40. Wang, Y. S.(2002).The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: An empirical study.Government Information Quarterly,20(4),333-352.
41. Webster, J.,Martocchio, J. J.(1992).Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications.MIS Quarterly,16(2),201-226.
42. Wycliffe, L.,Jostein, R.(1999).Predicting intended condom use among Tanzanian students using the theory of planned behavior.Journal of Health Psychology,4(4),497-506.
43. 林俊強、張長義、蔡博文、李建堂、丁志堅、李玉亭(2005)。運用公眾參與地理資訊系統於原住民族傳統領域之研究。地理學報，41，65-82。
44. 邱皓政(2004)。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。
45. 覃業明(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學資訊管理研究所。
46. 劉書蘭(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。雲林科技大學資訊管理系。
47. 蘇宏松(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。淡江大學資訊管理學系。