题名

住宅次市場定義合理性之探討:因素分析法之應用

并列篇名

Analysis of a Reasonable Definition of Housing Submarkets: An Application of Factor Analysis

DOI

10.6128/CP.36.2.133

作者

林祖嘉(Chu-Chia Lin);林素菁(Sue-Jing Lin)

关键词

住宅次市場 ; 因素分析 ; 集群分析 ; 單因子多變量變異數分析 ; 命中率 ; Housing submarkets ; Factor analysis ; Cluster analysis ; One-way MANOVA ; Hit rate

期刊名称

都市與計劃

卷期/出版年月

36卷2期(2009 / 06 / 30)

页次

133 - 153

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

在傳統實證分析中,最常被採用的次市場定義,是依先驗主觀認定的方式加以區隔,如以行政地理疆界或住宅特質來界定住宅次市場的範圍。雖然以先驗的主觀看法來定義次市場是蠻重要的,但是,如果以住宅代替性高低來定義次市場範圍模式,則實際住宅次市場可能有其他更合理定義方式。有鑑於此,本文以因素分析法,以大台北都會區爲例,探討住宅次市場定義之合理性。實證結果發現,依據2004年內政部地政司「房地產交易價格簡訊」資料庫,可將大台北地區住宅市場篩選出三個共同因素,分別爲住宅結構因素、總價坪數因素、與單價街寬因素,而且利用這三個共同因素,可將大台北都會區市場區隔爲三個次市場,且這三個次市場在統計上均具有顯著的差異。特別是在住宅結構因素上,與傳統行政區域劃分方式相較,新的統計方法的確能降低區域內的差異;亦即當此種方式至新定義次市場,可以使房價得到更好的估計結果。若我們再把台北市與台北縣的資料,利用因素分析法的個別市場方式,區分成三個次市場,來估計個別的房價,結果我們發現平均絕對估計誤差變小與命中率上升。換言之,新的統計方法不但可以當成另外一種次市場的定義,也可以當成傳統次市場的補充方法,此種互補的結果可以使我們對房價的估計準確度提高。

英文摘要

Previously, submarkets were defined based on the geographical boundaries or physical characteristics of the dwellings using a prior decision or predefined. Recently, there has been generally agreement that housing submarkets should be defined statistically to optimize the accuracy of hedonic predictions. This study first applies multivariate methods to define housing submarkets, and then explores the alternative definitions of submarkets on prediction accuracy. The empirical analysis employs an actual transaction data set from Taipei Metropolitan in 2004. This study found that the housing market of the Taipei Metropolitan area can be divided into three submarkets, with three common latent factors: housing construction, total housing price and floor space, and housing unit price and street width, respectively. Statistics differ significantly among the three submarkets. Compared with the traditional method by an administrative area, the inter-area difference of the housing construction factor is reduced. On the other hand, this study applies factor analysis using data for Taipei City and Taipei County, respectively. This study found that, when the separated data set was divided for both Taipei City and Taipei County, the hit rates were considerably higher while the MAPEs were significantly lower. The empirical results demonstrate that the three submarkets among city (or county) could be a good compliment for improving the prediction accuracy.

主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. 林祖嘉、林素菁(1993)。台灣地區環境品質與公共設施對房價與房租影響之分析。住宅學報,1,21-45。
    連結:
  2. 花敬群、張金鶚(1999)。住宅空間次市場價格比例與市場規模之關係。都市與計劃,26(1),79-94。
    連結:
  3. Adair, A. S.,Berry, J. N.,McGreal, W. S.(1996).Hedonic modeling, housing submarkets and residential valuation.Journal of Property Research,13(1),67-83.
  4. Allen, M. T.,Springer, T. M.,Waller, N. G.(1995).Implicit pricing across residential submarkets.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,11(2),137-151.
  5. Bajic, V.(1985).Housing-Market segmentation and demand for housing attributes: Some empirical findings.American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association,13(1),58-75.
  6. Basu, A.,Thibodeau, T. G.(1998).Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in house prices.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,17(1),61-85.
  7. Bourassa, S. C.,Cantoni, E.,Hoesli, M.(2007).Spatial dependence, housing submarkets, and house price prediction.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,35(2),143-160.
  8. Bourassa, S. C.,Hamelink, F.,Hoesli, M.,MacGregor, B. D.(1999).Defining housing submarkets.Journal of Housing Economics,8(2),160-183.
  9. Bourassa, S. C.,Hoesli, M.,Peng, V. S.(2003).Do housing submarkets really matter?.Journal of Housing Economics,12(1),12-28.
  10. Clapp, J.,Wang, Y.(2006).Defining neighborhood boundaries: Are census tracts obsolete?.Journal of Urban Economics,59(2),259-284.
  11. Dale-Johnson, D.(1982).An alternative approach to housing market segmentation using hedonic price data.Journal of Urban Economics,11(3),311-332.
  12. Dunse, N.,Leishman, C.,Watkins, C.(2001).Classifying office submarkets.Journal of Property Investment and Finance,19(3),236-250.
  13. Dunse, N.,Leishman, C.,Watkins, C.(2002).Testing for the existence of office sub-markets: A comparison of evidence from two cities.Urban Studies,39(3),483-506.
  14. Gabriel, S.(1984).A note on housing market segmentation in an israeli development town.Urban Studies,21(2),1989-1994.
  15. Galster, G.. C.(1987).Residential segregation and interracial economic disparities: A simultaneous-equations approach.Journal of Urban Economics,21(1),22-44.
  16. Goodman, A. C.(1978).Hedonic prices, price indexes and housing markets.Journal of Urban Economics,5(4),471-484.
  17. Goodman, A. C.(1981).Housing submarkets within urban areas: Definitions and evidence.Journal of Regional Science,21(2),175-185.
  18. Goodman, A. C.,Kawai, M.(1982).Permanent income, hedonic prices, and demand for housing: New evidence.Journal of Urban Economics,12(2),214-237.
  19. Goodman, A. C.,Thibodeau, T. G.(2003).Housing market segmentation and hedonic prediction accuracy.Journal of Housing Economics,12(3),181-201.
  20. Goodman, A. C.,Thibodeau, T. G.(1998).Housing market segmentation.Journal of Housing Economics,7(2),121-143.
  21. Grigsby, W.,Baratz, M.,Galster, G.,Maclennan, D.(1987).The dynamic of neighborhood change and decline.progress in planning,28(1),1-76.
  22. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1995).Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  23. Harsman, B.,Quigley, J. M.(1995).The spatial segregation of ethnic and demographic groups: Comparative evidence from Stockholm and san francisco.Journal of Urban Economics,37(1),1-16.
  24. Johnson, D. E.(1998).Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysts.Pacific Grove, CA:Duxbury Press.
  25. Lin, C. C.(1993).The relationship between rents and prices of owner-occupied housing in Taiwan.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,6(1),25-54.
  26. MacLennan, D.,Tu, Y.(1996).Economic perspectives on the structure of local housing systems.Housing Study,11(3),387-406.
  27. Michaels, R. G.,Smith, V. K.(1990).Market segmentation and valuing amenities with hedonic models: The case of hazardous waste sites.Journal of Urban Economics,28(2),223-242.
  28. Pace, R. K.,Gilley, O. W.(1998).Generalizing the OLS and grid estimators.Real Estate Economics,26(2),331-347.
  29. Palm, R.(1978).Spatial segmentation of the urban housing market.Economics Geography,54,210-221.
  30. Rosen, S.(1974).Hedonic price and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition.Journal of Political Economics,82(1),34-55.
  31. Rothenberg, J.,Galster, G. C.,Butler, R. V.,Pitkin, J. R.(1991).The Maze of Urban Housing Markets.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  32. Schnare, A.(1980).Trends in residential segregation by race: 1960-1970.Journal of Urban Economics,7(3),293-301.
  33. Schnare, A.,Struyk, R.(1976).Segmentation in urban housing markets.Journal of Urban Economics,3(2),146-166.
  34. Sonselie, J. C.,Portney, P. R.(1980).Gross rents and market values: Testing the implications of Tiebout's hypothesis.Journal of Urban Economics,7(1),102-118.
  35. Straszheim, M.(1973).Estimation of the demand for urban housing services from household interview data.Review of Economics and Statistics,55(1),1-8.
  36. Tu, Y.,Sun, H.,Yu, S. M.(2007).Spatial autocorrelations and urban housing market segmentation.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,34(3),385-406.
  37. 周文賢(2002)。多變量統計分析SAS/STAT使用方法。台北:智勝文化事業。
  38. 許佑全、陳彥仲(2003)。中華民國住宅學會第十二屆年會論文集。新竹:
  39. 陳心怡、陳彥仲(2002)。中華民國住宅學會第十一屆年會論文集。南投:
  40. 陳彥仲、張雅慧(2002)。中華民國住宅學會第十一屆年會論文集。南投:
  41. 楊宗憲(2004)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立政治大學地政研究所。
  42. 劉祥熹、黃日鉦(2003)。資料挖掘技術應用於市場區隔分析之研究。電子商務與數位生活研討會論文集,台北:
  43. 謝博明、林致慶(2004)。中華民國住宅學會第十三屆年會論文集。台北:
被引用次数
  1. 陳國華、林子欽、李汪穎(2011)。公寓建物之折舊估算與房屋稅負。都市與計劃,38(1),31-46。
  2. 黃苡筑、林怡芯、田政哲(2016)。影響台中市居民對大樓型預售屋購買意願影響因素之研究。國立虎尾科技大學學報,33(2),45-56。
  3. 馬毓駿,林祖嘉(2012)。貝氏多層次模型在台灣不動產市場估價之應用─以台北市住宅建物為例。住宅學報,21(1),1-18。
  4. 謝博明(2015)。住宅次市場界定及住宅價格空間分析: 以新升格之台南市為例。住宅學報,24(1),29-54。