文化導向都市再生之策略模式：臺北市保安宮文化慶典與空間計畫的個案研究

Strategic Models of Culture-Led Urban Regeneration: A Case Study of Taipei Baoan Temple's Cultural Festival and Spatial Plan

10.6128/CP.36.3.231

林政逸(Cheng-Yi Lin)；辛晚教(Woan-Chiau Hsing)

文化慶典 ； 社群 ； 廟宇 ； 文化導向都市再生 ； Cultural festival ； Communities ； Temple ； Culture-led urban regeneration

都市與計劃

36卷3期（2009 / 09 / 01）

231 - 254

繁體中文

運用文化資源做都市再生之觸媒業成爲後工業都市之文化策略。既有文獻多關注大型文化設施及商業慶典所衍生之地區再生效果，甚少討論培育都市內無形文化資源之重要性，以及如何整合地方文化慶典及文化空間於都市再生計劃。本文目的係以臺北市保安宮地區的文化慶典及空間計劃爲個案，探究臺北市文化導向都市再生之策略模式。本文結論指出臺北市採取兩種不同策略取向以塑造地方獨特性。首先，運用象徵性文化空間及其文化慶典來活化地區，由保安宮動員民俗藝文網絡與地方社群參與文化慶典活動，此文化慶典機制構築地方制度能力，並整合地方文化與保安宮地區成爲一個傳統文化展演空間；再者，地方政府企圖以核心區空間改善計劃，創造實質再生效果，並呈現地方獨特之文化意象，以促銷地方獨特性。政策意涵方面，本文建議政府所執行之文化導向都市再生計劃不應簡化爲一種追求經濟效益與邁向全球都市的空間策略；相反地，政府需從地方角度瞭解地方文化慶典之時空特性與其動員網路，才能將地方文化獨特性整合到都市再生計劃。

Capitalizing on cultural resources as a catalyst of urban regeneration has become a crucial cultural strategy in the post-industrial context of urban development. Existing research has neglected to address the cultivation of intangible cultural resources within a city, and focuses on using physical cultural facilities and commercial events as the motors to drive the economic regeneration of an area. However, the means to integrate endogenous cultural festivals and localized cultural spaces into the particularities of regeneration projects are still poorly understood. This study explores the strategic models of Taipei's culture-led urban regeneration through the case study of the Baoan Temple Cultural Festival and spatial plan. In conclusion, this case shows two different approaches to culture-led regeneration of Taipei. First, local government treats a local temple as a symbolic space of revitalization project. Meanwhile, local folk culture is revitalized through Baoan Temple mobilized folk art network and local communities to engage in the cultural festival. The institutional capacity of the cultural festival, which stemmed from the collaborations of government and Baoan Temple, has increasingly transformed a folk cultural space in a regeneration project. Second, the local government launched an infrastructure-based project in order to enhance the quality of area, and to represent local particularities in the context of globalization. The policy implication of this article is that a cultural project should not be reduced to an economic-centred regeneration effect, nor be a spatial strategy of global city. Instead, local governments are advised to understand the time-space features of local cultural festivals, and the dynamics of network mobilization, in order to enliven communities and to reshape a positive regeneration effect in the context of Taipei. This understanding from a local perspective helps to integrate local uniqueness into a regeneration project.

1. 王志弘(2003)。臺北市文化治理的性質與轉變(1967-2002)。臺灣社會研究季刊，52，121-186。
   連結：
2. 林政逸、辛晚教(2001)。廟宇文化空間與社群互動之關係。都市與計劃，28(1)，107-125。
   連結：
3. 郭瑞坤、徐家楓(2008)。社區文化資產保存之影響因素研究：從社會資本觀點探討。都市與計劃，35(3)，253-268。
   連結：
4. 黃禮強、張長義(2008)。宗教勝地居民地方感之研究－以苗栗獅頭山為例。都市與計劃，35(3)，227-251。
   連結：
5. Bailey, C.,Miles, S.,Stark. P.(2004).Culture-led urban regeneration and the revitalization of identities in Newcastle, Gateshead and the north east of England.International Journal of Cultural Policy,10(1),47-65.
6. Bassett, K.(1993).Urban cultural strategies and urban regeneration: A case study and critique.Environment and Planning A,25(2),1773-1788.
7. Bassett, K.(1996).Partnerships, business elites and urban politics: New forms of governance in an English city?.Urban Studies,33(3),539-555.
8. Bassett, K.,Smith, I.,Banks, M.,O''Connor. J.,Buck, N.,Gordon, I.,Harding A.,Turok, I (ed.)(2005).Changing Cities: Rethinking Urban Competitiveness, Cohesion and Governance.New York:Palgrave.
9. Bianchini, F.,Bianchini, F.,Parkinson, M. (ed.)(1993).Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: The West European Experience.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
10. Bianchini, F.,Parkinson, M.(1993).Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: The West European Experience.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
11. Cars, G.,Healey, P.,Madanipour, A.,Magalhaes, C. D.(2002).Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux.Aldershot:Ashgate.
12. Chang, T. C.(2000).Renaissance revisited: Singapore as a 'global city for the arts'.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,24(4),818-831.
13. Council for Cultural Planning and Development(1994).National Festival of Culture and Arts.Taipei:Council for Cultural Planning and Development.
14. Dicks, B.(2003).Culture on Display: The Production of Contemporary Visibility.Buckingham:Open University Press.
15. Dziembowska-Kowalska, J.,Funck, R. H.(1999).Cultural activities: Source of competitiveness and prosperity in urban regions.Urban Studies,36(8),1381-1398.
16. Evans, G.(2005).Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture's contribution to regeneration.Urban Studies,42(5/6),959-983.
17. Florida, R.(2002).The Rise of the Creative Class.New York:Basic Books.
18. García, B.(2004).Cultural policy and urban regeneration in Western European cities: Lessons from experience, prospects for the future.Local Economy,19(4),312-326.
19. García, B.(2004).Urban regeneration, arts programming and major events.International Journal of Cultural policy,10(1),103-118.
20. Griffiths, R.(1993).The politics of cultural policy in urban regeneration strategies.Policy and Politics,21(1),39-46.
21. Griffiths, R.(1995).Cultural strategies and new modes of urban intervention.Cities,12(4),253-265.
22. Hall, T.,Hubbard, P.(1998).The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regimes and Representations.London:John Wiley.
23. Harvey, D.(1989).From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism.Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography,71(1),3-17.
24. Healey, P.(1998).Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning.Environment and Planning A,30(9),1531-1546.
25. Katz, P.(2003).Religion and the state in postwar Taiwan.The China Quarterly,177,395-412.
26. Kong, L.(2000).Culture, economy, policy: Trends and developments.Geoforum,31(4),385-390.
27. Lash, S.,Urry, J.(1994).Economics of Signs and Space.London:Routledge.
28. Miles, S.(2005).'Our Tyne': Iconic regeneration and the revitalisation of identity in Newcastle Gateshead.Urban Studies,42(5/6),913-926.
29. Miles, S.,Paddison, R.(2005).The rise and rise of cultural-led urban regeneration.Urban Studies,42(5/6),833-839.
30. Mommaas, H.(2004).Cultural clusters and the post-industrial city: Towards the remapping of urban cultural policy.Urban Studies,41(3),507-532.
31. Montgomery, J.(2004).Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration (Part 2): A review of four cultural quarters in the UK, Ireland and Australia.Planning Practice and Research,19(1),3-31.
32. Moss, L.(2002).Sheffield's Cultural Industry Quarter 20 years on: What can be learned from a pioneering example?.The International Journal of Cultural Policy,8(2),211-219.
33. Myerscough, J.(1988).The Economic Importance of the Arts in Britain.London:Policy Studies Institute.
34. The definition of 'cultural industries', Manchester Institute for Popular Culture
35. Peck, J.(2002).Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neo-liberal workfare.Economic Geography,78(3),331-360.
36. Peck, J.(2005).Struggling with the creative class.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,29(4),740-770.
37. Putnam, R. D.(1993).Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
38. Quinn, B.(2005).Arts festivals and the city.Urban Studies,42(5/6),927-943.
39. Sassen, S.(2001).The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo.New York:Princeton University Press.
40. Seo, J. K.(2002).Re-urbanisation in regenerated areas of Manchester and Glasgow: New residents and the problems of sustainability.Cities,19(2),113-121.
41. Smith, G.(2001).Religion as a source of social capital in the regeneration of East London.Rising East,4(3),125-153.
42. Strom, E.(2002).Converting pork into porcelain: Vultural institutions and downtown development.Urban Affairs Review,38(1),3-21.
43. Teo, P.(2003).The limits of imagineering: A case study of Penang.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,27(3),545-563.
44. UNESCO(2003).Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage.Paris:UNESCO..
45. Waterman, S.(1998).Carnivals for elites? The cultural politics of art festivals.Progress in Human Geography,22(1),54-74.
46. Whitt, J. A.(1987).Mozart in the metropolis: The arts coalition and the urban growth machine.Urban Affairs Quarterly,23(1),15-36.
47. Winckler, E. A.,Harrell, S.,Huang, C.C. (ed.)(1994).Cultural Change in Postwar Taiwan.Oxford:Westview Press.
48. Wynne, D.(1992).The Culture Industry: The Arts in Urban Regeneration.London:Avebury.
49. Yeoh, B. S. A.(2005).The global cultural city? Spatial imagineering and politics in the (multi) cultural marketplaces of south-east Asia.Urban Studies,42(5/6),945-958.
50. Zukin, S.(1998).Urban lifestyles: Diversity and standardisation in spaces of consumption.Urban Studies,35(5/6),825-839.
51. Zukin, S.(1995).The Cultures of Cities.London:Blackwell.
52. 申學庸(1993)。中國國民黨中央常務委員會專題報告中國國民黨中央常務委員會專題報告,臺北:中國國民黨中央常務委員會。
53. 聯合報(1996/09/23)
54. 池永歆(1999)。臺灣漢人傳統聚落空間性的構成與內涵。地理教育，25，55-72。
55. 吳昭怡(1990)。從經濟均富到文化均富。天下雜誌，110，98-101。
56. 李豐楙(1995)。臺灣慶成醮與民間廟會文化：一個非常觀狂文化的休閒論。寺廟與民間文化研討會論文集，臺北:
57. 辛晚教(2009)。臺北孔廟禮制空間與大龍峒文化環境專題研究。臺北:臺北市政府都市更新處。
58. 林美容(1996)。祭祀圈、信仰圈與民俗宗教文化活動的空間形構。地方文化與區域發展研討會論文集，臺北:
59. 民生報(1993/07/20)
60. 孫全文、邱肇輝(1992)。臺灣傳統都市空間之研究。臺北:詹氏書局。
61. 馬英九(2006)。臺北市市長就職七週年演講。
62. 張介人(1981)。臺北保安宮專誌。臺北:財團法人臺北保安宮。
63. 張珣(2002)。祭祀圈研究的反省與後祭祀圈時代的來臨。國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊，58，78-111。
64. 中國時報(1998/02/23)
65. 中國時報(2000/03/28)
66. 黃勝雄(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中興大學都市計劃研究所。
67. 黃麗玲(2003)。一九九0年代臺北市都市規劃中的社區參與：全球過程、地方政治以及鄰里回應。地理學報，34，61-78。
68. 廖武治(2002)。2002保生文化祭成果專輯。臺北:財團法人臺北保安宮。
69. 廖武治(2002)。大龍峒保安宮古蹟保存經驗。臺北:財團法人臺北保安宮。
70. 臺北市政府都市更新處(2006)。都市更新年刊。臺北:臺北市政府都市更新處。
71. 臺北市政府都市更新處(2005)。北大同文化園區專案推動小組專案推動小組第6次會議紀錄。臺北:臺北市政府都市更新處。
72. 臺北市政府都市更新處(2004)。北大同文化園區專案推動小組專案推動小組第1次會議紀錄。臺北:臺北市政府都市更新處。
73. 臺北市政府都市發展局(2002)。都市發展年刊。臺北:臺北市政府都市發展局。

1. 林坤誼、余昕晏、王雅慧(2010)。臺灣小麥故鄉的社區營造策略、困境與解決策略之研究。藝術學報，87，467-493。
2. 王美雅(2019)。節慶活動創新環境衡量之初探：以鶯歌陶瓷節為例。管理資訊計算，8(2)，34-47。
3. 王志弘(2014)。文化治理的內蘊衝突與政治折衝。思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌，52(4)，65-109。
4. 王志弘(2019)。臺灣都市與區域發展之文化策略批判研究回顧，1990s－2010s。文化研究，29，13-62。