台北都會區空間蔓延與緊密發展型態趨勢之研究

Spatial Sprawl and Compact Development Patterns and Trends in the Taipei Metropolitan Area

10.6128/CP.37.3.281

徐國城(Kuo-Cheng Hsu)；賴宗裕(Tsung-Yu Lai)；詹士樑(Shih-Liang Chan)

空間發展型態 ； 蔓延衡量指標 ； 蔓延指數 ； 地景生態指標 ； Spatial development pattern ； Sprawl evaluation indicator ； Sprawl indices ； Landscape ecological indices

都市與計劃

37卷3期（2010 / 09 / 30）

281 - 303

繁體中文

在都市蔓延發展將對城鄉環境產生地景、土地利用、交通、財政、公共設施機能與環境上的負面衝擊，此種發展型態乃聚合眾多都市發展特性所產生之動態現象，難以採單一指標觀察，爰此，本研究透過衛星影像、地理資訊系統與地景生態指標分析方法，建立蔓延衡量指標，並推算1991年與2001年之台北都會區蔓延指數，藉以釐清其發展型態與變化趨勢。研究發現台北都會區在十年間，計有11個行政區趨向蔓延發展的情況顯著，14個行政區則呈現顯著的緊密發展趨勢。由空間分布情況觀之，台北都會區之蔓延發展趨勢主要分爲兩個路徑方向，其一，由台北市東側邊緣之內湖區與南港區往東擴張至汐止市、基隆市與瑞芳鎮，另一路徑係自台北市南側邊緣之文山區往南擴張至新店市；呈現緊密發展趨勢之地區則多位屬台北市西側與北側邊緣，西側由鶯歌鎮、樹林市、泰山鄉、林口鄉等地區與桃園縣相接連，另一方向則由士林區、北投區往北側至八里鄉、淡水鎮、金山鄉及萬里鄉等地區，究其形成原因，乃此等地區十年間之人口成長速度大於建成地區擴張速度，加以土地開發區位，多集中於建成地區周邊或原聚集範圍內之剩餘空地，故隨著建成地區面積比率增加，而讓建成嵌塊體形狀零散的程度降低，在地表覆蓋呈現緊密發展之情況。

Sprawling development has exacerbated the financial burden on governments and environmental pollution. This development pattern is a dynamic phenomenon of a combination of many development features and is difficult to observe with a single indicator. This study establishes the evaluation indicators of urban sprawl using analytical techniques that utilize satellite images, geographic information system and the landscape ecological indices. It computes Taipei metropolitan area indices for 1991 and 2001 in an effort to characterize the area's development patterns and trends. Analytical results indicate that 11 districts in the metropolitan area have a trend toward sprawling development, while 14 districts have trends favoring compact development. In terms of spatial distributions, the Taipei metropolitan area is expanding in two directions-from the eastern edge of Taipei City (Neihu and Nangang districts) eastward toward Xizhi, Keelung and Ruifang, and from the southern edge (Wenshan District) southward toward Xindian. The areas with a trend toward high-density development are located west and north of Taipei City, particularly in Yingge, Wugu, Tucheng, Bali, Shulin, Luzhou and Tamshui. The cause of this high-density development is that the population increased at a rate faster than built districts in these areas during 1991-2001. Additionally, land development is concentrated on remaining vacant land surrounding built districts or where the population density was high. As the surface area of the built districts increased, the scattering degree of patch shape within these areas decreased, demonstrating a compact development of land use pattern.

1. 徐國城(2006)。緊密都市形態之正負面效益論述—兼論對台灣城鄉空間發展之參考觀點。土地問題研究季刊，5(4)，32-46。
   連結：
2. 台北縣政府(2000)，「修訂台北縣綜合發展計畫 — 第一篇：台北縣整體發展計畫」，台北：台北縣政府。
3. Knaap, G. J., Song, Y., Ewing, R., and Clifton, K. (2005). Seeing the elephant: Multi-disciplinary measures of urban sprawl, National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, http://www.smartgrowth.umd.edu/research/pdf/KnaapSongEwingEtAl_Elephant_022305.pdf, (Oct. 14, 2007).
4. Benfield, F. K.,Matthew, D. R.,Chen, D. D. T.(1999).Once There Were Greenfields: How Urban Sprawl is Undermining America's Environment, Economy and Social Fabric.Washington, DC:Natural Resources Defense Council.
5. Breheny, M.(1997).Urban compaction: Feasible and acceptable?.Cities,14(4),209-217.
6. Brueckner, J. K.(2000).Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies.International Regional Science Review,23(2),160-171.
7. Burchell, R. W.,Shad, N. A.,Listokin, D.,Phillips, H.,Downs, A.,Seskin, S.,Davis, J.S.,Moore, T.,Helton, D.,Gall, M.(1998).The Cost of Sprawl: Revisited.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
8. Burton, E.(2000).The compact city: Just or just compact？ A preliminary analysis.Urban Studies,37(11),1969-2001.
9. European Environment Agency(2006).Urban Sprawl in Europe: The Ignored Challenge.Copenhagen:European Environment Agency.
10. Ewing, R. H.(1994).Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: A literature review.Environmental and Urban Issues,21(2),1-15.
11. Freeman, L.(2001).The effects of sprawl on neighborhood social ties.Journal of the American Planning Association,67(1),69-77.
12. Frenkel, A.(2004).A land-consumption model its application to Israel's future spatial development.Journal of the American Planning Association,70(4),453-470.
13. Frenkel, A.,Ashkenazi, M.(2008).Measuring urban sprawl: How can we deal with it?.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,35(1),56-79.
14. Fulton, W.,Pendall, R.,Nguyen, M.,Harrison, A.(2001).Who sprawls most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S..The Brookings Institution Survey Series,July,1-23.
15. Galster, G.,Hanson, R.,Ratcliffe, M. R.,Wolman, H.,Coleman, S.,Freihage, J.(2001).Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept.Housing Policy Debate,12(4),681-717.
16. Gordon, P.,Richardson, H. W.(1997).Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?.Journal of the American Planning Association,63(1),95-106.
17. Hasse, J. E.,Lathrop, R. G.(2003).Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl.Applied Geography,23(2-3),159-175.
18. Herold, M.,Goldstein, N. C.,Clarke, K. C.(2003).The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling.Remote Sensing of Environment,86(3),286-302.
19. Jenks, M.,Burton, E.,Williams, K.(1996).The Compact City A Sustainable Urban Form?.London:Oxford.
20. Johnson, M. P.(2001).Environment impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda.Environment and Planning A,33(4),717-735.
21. Knaap, G.,Talen, E.,Olshansky, R.,Forrest, C.(2001).Report Prepared for Illinois Department of Natural ResourcesReport Prepared for Illinois Department of Natural Resources,未出版
22. Kolankiewicz, L.,Beck, R.(2001).Weighting Sprawl Factor in Large U.S. Cities.Arlington:NumbersUSA.
23. Lee, J.,Tian, L.(1998).Analyzing growth: Management policies with geographical information systems.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,25(6),865-879.
24. Lopez, R.,Hynes, H. P.(2003).Sprawl in the 1990s: Measurement, distribution and trends.Urban Affairs Reviews,38(3),325-355.
25. Luck, M.,Wu, J.(2002).A gradient analysis of the landscape pattern of urbanization in the Phoenix metropolitan area of USA.Landscape Ecology,17(4),327-339.
26. Martinuzzi, S.,Gould, W. A.,Gonzalez, O. M. R.(2007).Land development, land use, and urban sprawl in Puerto Rico integrating remote sensing and population census data.Landscape and Urban Planning,79(3-4),288-297.
27. Mieszkowski, P.,Mills, E. S.(1993).The causes of metropolitan suburbanization.The Journal of Economic Perspectives,7(3),135-147.
28. Nelson, A. C.(1992).Characterizing exurbia.Journal of Planning Literature,6(4),350-368.
29. Schneider, A.,Woodcock, C. E.(2008).Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metric and census information.Urban Studies,45(3),659-692.
30. Sierra Club(1998).The Dark Side of the American Dream: The Costs and Consequences of Suburban Sprawl.College Park:Sierra Club.
31. Sierra Club(1998).What is Sprawl?.College Park:Sierra Club.
32. Song, Y.,Knaap, G. J.(2004).Measuring urban form: Is Portland winning the war on sprawl?.Journal of the American Planning Association,70(2),210-224.
33. Soule, D. C.(2006).Historical framework: Cities and their regions, suburbanization, and federal policies.Urban Sprawl: A Comprehensive Reference Guide,Westport:
34. Staley, S. R.(1999).The sprawling of America: In defense of the dynamic city.
35. Tsai, Y. H.(2005).Quantifying urban form: Compactness versus sprawl.Urban Studies,42(1),248-275.
36. USHUD.(1999).The State of the Cities 1999: Third Annual Report.Washington, DC:US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
37. Wassmer, R.(2000).,Sacramento:Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
38. Weiler, S.(2003).Pioneers of rural sprawl in the Rocky Mountain West.The Review of Regional Studies,33(3),264-283.
39. Williams, D. C.(2000).Urban Sprawl: A Reference Handbook.Santa Barbara:ABC-CLIO.
40. Wolman, H.,Galster, G.,Hanson, R.,Ratcliffe, M.,Furdell, K.,Sarzynski, A.(2005).The fundamental challenge in measuring sprawl: With land should be considered?.The Professional Geographer,57(1),94-105.
41. Yeh, A. G. O.,Li, X.(2001).Measurement and monitoring of urban sprawl in a rapidly growing region using entropy.Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,67(1),83-90.
42. 李承嘉(1999)。1990年以後台灣土地政策與問題—社經結構變遷的觀點。現代地政理論：殷教授章甫七秩華誕祝壽論文集，台北:
43. 李承嘉(1998)。台灣戰後（1949-1997）土地政策分析。台北:正揚。
44. 張紹勳、張紹評、林秀娟(2000)。SPSS For Windows 多變量統計分析第2版。台北:松崗。
45. 詹士樑(2007)。,台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
46. 蔡勇美編、章英華編(1997)。台灣的都市社會。台北:巨流。
47. 賴宗裕(2008)。成長管理與規劃經濟。台北:國立政治大學地政學系。

1. 黃若慈、李涵茹、王志弘(2013)。縉紳化或便利城市升級？新北市三重區都市生活支持系統再結構。國家發展研究，12(2)，179-230。
2. 龍世俊、李崇睿、吳治達(2013)。乾淨空氣何處尋？空氣污染暴險之人口及地理不均等分佈。人口學刊，47，1-33。
3. 蘇娟儀、黃宗煌、彭開瓊、傅孟臺(2013)。五都能源效率、指標與不均度比較：以家庭用電為例。都市與計劃，40(2)，135-156。
4. (2010)。都會區空間發展樣貌之探討—發展密度與地景生態指數的整合評估途徑—。土地經濟年刊，21，97-124。