空間認知與移動路徑之探討

Effects of Spatial Cognition on Route Choice Behavior

10.6128/CP.38.3.327

竇劭文(Shao-Wen Tou)；林晏州(Yann-Jou Lin)

空間意象 ； 空間移動策略 ； 移動距離 ； 步行者 ； Space image ； Moving strategy ； Travel distance ； Pedestrian

都市與計劃

38卷3期（2011 / 09 / 30）

327 - 344

繁體中文

本研究之目的在於建構出信義計畫商圈之重要空間意象結構，並進一步探討不同空間移動策略傾向受訪者在空間認知上的差異，以及受訪者空間認知程度對其移動路徑距離之影響。研究方法採用現地問卷調查，在空間移動策略對空間認知程度影響分析部份，結果顯示當參考應用之空間知識不同，受訪者對空間環境結構之理解亦具顯著差異，其中路徑型空間移動策略傾向之受訪者對空間認知程度明顯較高，地標型傾向受訪者次之，概觀型傾向受訪者則對空間認知程度最低。在受訪者移動距離分析部份，研究結果顯示當受訪者對空間認知程度越高時，其移動距離與實際最短距離間之差值越小，其中又以地標元素對受訪者選擇最短距離路徑之影響最爲重要，路徑型移動策略受訪者則在地標元素與通道元素變項上皆達顯著水準。

The purposes of This study constructs a space image of the Xinyi planned district, Taipei City, and investigates relationships among degree of spatial cognition, moving strategy and the difference between the travel distance and shortest travel distance of pedestrians walk. Analyses of the degree of spatial cognition, moving strategy and travel distance were performed using field surveys. Survey results demonstrate that significant differences existed among respondents in terms of moving strategy. Analytical results also show that respondents who travel by route-strategy had a higher degree of spatial cognition than other respondents. For degree of spatial cognition, survey results indicate that as respondent spatial cognition increases, differences between their actual travel distance and the shortest travel distance decline. The number of landmarks recognized by respondents significantly influenced their travel distance; and the ”path element” was significant only for respondents travel by route-strategy.

1. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men, Psychological Review, 55(4): 189-208.
2. Aragones, J. I.,Arredondo, J. M.(1985).Structure of urban cognitive maps.Journal of Environmental Psychology,5(2),197-212.
3. Bovy, P. H. L., Stern, E.(1990).Route Choice: Wayfinging in Transport Networks.Michigan:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Chen, J. L.,Stanney, K. M.(1999).A Theoretical Model of Wayfinding in Virtual Environments: Proposed Strategies for Navigational Aiding.Cambridge:M. I. T. Press.
5. Darken, R. P.,Sibert, J. L.(1996).Wayfinding Strategies and Behaviors in Large Virtual Worlds.New York:A. C. M..
6. Downs, R. M.,Stea, D.(1970).Image & Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior.New Jersey:Transaction Publishers.
7. Ellis, A. W.,Young, A. W.(1995).Human Cognition Neuropsychology: A Textbook with Readings.London:Psychology Press.
8. Elvins, T. T.(1997).Visfiles Virtually Lost in Virtual Worlds and Wayfinding Without a Cognitive Map.New York:A. C. M..
9. Hoogendoorn, S. P.,Bovy, P. H. L.(2004).Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models.Transportation Research B,38(2),169-190.
10. Kitchin, R. M.(1994).Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them.Journal of Environmental Psychology,14(1),1-19.
11. Lynch, K.(1960).The Image of the City.Cambridge:M. I. T. Press.
12. Marchand, B.(1974).Pedestrian traffic planning and the perception of the urban environment: A French example.Environment and Planning A,6(5),491-507.
13. Moore, M. G.,Cookson, P.,Donaldson, J.,Quiqley, B. A.(1990).Contemporary Issues in American Distance Education.New York:Pergamon Press.
14. Pazzaglia, F.,Beni, R. D.(2001).Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,13(4),493-508.
15. Seneviratne, P. N.,Morrall, J. F.(1985).Analysis of factors affecting the choice of route of pedestrians.Transportation Planning and Technology,10(2),147-159.
16. Timpf, S.,Rüetschi, U. J.(2004).Modeling Wayfinding in Public Transport: Network Space and Scene Space.Berlin:Springer.
17. Zacharias, J.(2001).Pedestrian behavior pedestrian behavior and perception in urban walking environments.Journal of Planning Literature,16(1),3-18.
18. 危芷芬譯(1995)。環境心理學。台北:五南出版社。
19. 林靜怡(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學地理環境資源學系。
20. 張錦桐(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所。
21. 聶筱秋譯、胡中凡譯、唐筱雯譯、葉冠伶譯(2003)。環境心理學。台北:桂冠圖書公司。

1. 賴志純,呂佳育(2019)。運用AR技術探討沿海文化雕塑造型建構。設計研究學報，12，47-64。