地域權力的空間化：以南韓區域發展為例

Influence of Territorialized Party Politics on Uneven Regional Development in South Korea

10.6128/CP.39.2.177

王綺年(Chi-Nien Wang)

區域發展 ； 地域主義 ； 地方政府 ； 發展政策 ； Regional development ； Localism ； Local government ； Developmental policy

都市與計劃

39卷2期（2012 / 06 / 01）

177 - 198

繁體中文

南韓城鄉發展嚴重失衡，特別是表現在基礎建設以及人均所得等方面，始終是韓國政府亟思解決的問題。由於相對程度的經濟、政治甚至文化資源皆較集中於首爾都會圈（包含首爾特別市、仁川廣域市與京畿道），故吸引大量的人口聚集在此一範圍內，目前人口數已達2360多萬人左右，約佔韓國總人口數的五成，對於資源的吸納與消耗都不利於南韓國家整體的發展。在經歷1960年代以來諸多區域發展政策的擬定與執行，似乎也未見成效。然而，不可諱言，南韓區域或城鄉發展差距現狀不僅受限於資源分配不均的問題，也受到在政黨政治發展過程中，頗為濃厚地域主義的影響甚鉅。基於此，本文嘗試透過南韓政府在韓戰後所進行一系列的區域平衡發展政策，及其所產生之實際經濟發展結果，來凸顯政策本身的矛盾性，以及此一矛盾之地域主義的根源性，以釐清韓國在整體區域平衡發展上未能產生效果的主要因素。

The marked imbalance between urban and rural development in South Korea, especially in infrastructure and per capita, is a problem that the South Korean government intends to solve. The relative degree of economic, political, and cultural resources concentrated in the Seoul metropolitan area, including Seoul Special City, Incheon Metropolitan City, and Gyeonggi-Do, has led to a population currently exceeding 23 million. About the half of the entire population in the Seoul metropolitan area, in terms of absorption and consumption of resources, is disadvantageous to national development policies of South Korea. Nevertheless, in addition to the influence of the imbalance in how resources are distributed, the influence from deep-rooted localism during the development of political parties plays an essential role in differences in urban and rural development. This study highlights the contradiction between policies and resources, namely, localism, which leads to contradictions by examining a series of area-balanced developmental policies implemented by the South Korean government after the Korean War. Consequences related to actual economic development are analyzed to clarify the reasons accounting for failed policies in balancing urban and rural development.

1. 謝宏昌(2007)。規劃「都會區域」：一個概念的考察。都市與計劃，34(3)，273-291。
   連結：
2. Bae, Y.,Sellers, J. M.(2007).Globalization, the developmental state and the politics of urban growth in Korea: A multilevel analysis.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,31(3),543-560.
3. Burmeister, L. L.(1990).South Korea's rural development dilemma trade pressures and agricultural sector adjustment.Asian Survey,30(7),711-723.
4. Chang, Y. S.,Seok, H. H.,Baker, D. L.(2009).Korea Confronts Globalization.London:Routledge.
5. Hassink, R.(2001).Towards regionally embedded innovation support systems in South Korea? Case studies from Kyongbuk-Taegu and Kyonggi.Urban Studies,38(8),1373-1395.
6. Ho, S. P. S.(1979).Rural-urban imbalance in South Korea in the 1970s.Asian Survey,19(7),645-659.
7. Horiuchi, Y.,Lee, S. J.(2008).The presidency, regionalism, and distributive politics in South Korea.Comparative political Studies,41(6),861-882.
8. Kang, M. G.(1998).Understanding urban problems in Korea: Continuity and change.Development and Society,27(1),99-120.
9. Kim, H.(2004).Policy for balanced national development in Korea.KIET Industrial Economic Review,9(3),4-18.
10. Kwon, K.(2004).Regionalism in South Korea: Its origins and role in her democratization.Politics and Society,32(4),545-574.
11. Lee, Y. S.(2009).Balanced development in globalizing regional development? Unpacking the new regional policy of South Korea.Regional Studies,43(3),353-367.
12. Markusen, A.,Park, S. O.(1994).The state as industrial locator and district builder: The case of Changwon, South Korea.Economic Geography,70(2),157-181.
13. Moon, W.(2005).Decomposition of regional voting in South Korea.Party Politics,11(5),579-599.
14. Park, B. G.(2003).Territorialized party politics and the politics of local economic development: State-led industrialization and political regionalism in South Korea.Political Geography,22(8),811-839.
15. Park, H. J.(2007).Small business place in the South Korean state-society relations.Asian Journal ot Political Science,15(2),195-218.
16. Park, H. J.(2004).Between development and the state: Recasting South Korean dirigisme.Asian Journal of Political Science,12(1),95-115.
17. Park, M. K.(1987).Interest representation in South Korea: The limits of corporatist control.Asian Survey,27(8),903-917.
18. Richardson, H. W.,Hwang, M. C.(1987).Urban and Regional Policy in Korea and International Experiences.Seoal:Kon-Kuk University Press.
19. Schätzl, L.,Karin W.,Lee, Y. W.(1997).Regional Development and Decentralization Policy in South Korea.Pasir Panjang:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
20. Shin, D. H.(2001).An alternative approach to development science parks: A case study from Korea.Regional Science,80,103-111.
21. Yu, E. Y.(1990).Regionalism in the South Korean job market: An analysis of regional-origin inequality among migrants in Seoul.Pacific Affairs,63(1),24-39.
22. 全相京、葉克林(2008)。韓國地方政府財政決定機制研究（譯著）。學海，2008(2)，80-89。
23. 李輝、劉春豔(2008)。日本與韓國城市化及發展模式分析。現代日本經濟，2008(4)，46-50。
24. 杜依芳(2008)。亞洲主要國家各具特色之區域創新體系。台灣經濟研究月刊，31(9)，60-67。
25. 服部民夫(1994)。韓國─人脈與政治文化。台北:月旦出版社。
26. 金榮枰、徐海港(2007)。韓國的新村運動及其政府角色。學海，2007(4)，96-101。
27. 金鍾范(2005)。韓國區域發展政策。上海:上海財經大學出版社。
28. 施鴻志、解鴻年、胡太山(1992)。台灣地區科技園區與區域發展策略。都市與計劃，19(1)，75-92。
29. 馬東亮(2008)。韓國國會政治中的地域主義及對中國的啟示。人大研究，2008(4)，38-40。
30. 陳剛華(2008)。韓國“新村運動”起因研究。安徽農業科學，36(18)，7939-7945。
31. 蔡增家(2005)。1993-2003 南韓轉型政黨輪替與政經體制的轉變。台北:巨流圖書公司。
32. 鄭繼永(2008)。韓國政黨體系。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。

1. 高郁婷、王志弘(2017)。暗黑記憶的文化轉生：韓國光州與台灣高雄的人權紀念地景。臺灣社會研究季刊，107，47-95。
2. 王綺年(2016)。南韓永續農業發展中的國家角色與社會制衡。遠景基金會季刊，17(2)，113-148。