信任與都市更新參與意願之研究

The Influence of Trust in Willingness to Participate in Urban Renewal

10.6128/CP.40.1.1

邊泰明(Tai-Ming Ben)；黃泳涵(Yeong-Harn Huang)

都市更新 ； 信任 ； 集體行動 ； Urban renewal ； Trust ； Collective action

都市與計劃

40卷1期（2013 / 03 / 31）

1 - 29

繁體中文

都市更新是一種土地產權整合與開發利益分配的過程，也是需要集體行動才能完成的行為。本研究關注於都市更新中，集體行動困境如何破除，使都市更新參與意願整合工作順利推動。據此，本研究以集體行動理論及信任理論為研究立論基礎，選取台北市木柵地區「國立政治大學北側更新示範地區」作為案例地區，採問卷調查法以當地居民為抽樣調查之對象，並採用因素分析與結構方程模式作為資料分析方法，以更新認知、社會網絡、實施者信賴、都更整體信任程度與參與更新意願為五大潛在變項進行結構模式驗證，驗證結果發現都更整體信任程度對於參與更新意願具有正向直接影響，更新認知、社會網絡與實施者信賴三者對於都更整體信任程度亦有正向直接影響關係，其中又以實施者信賴為影響居民都更整體信任程度之最重要因素，並具有更新認知與都更整體信任程度間中介效果。

Urban renewal comprises the integration of land rights and the distribution of development benefits, which can only be accomplished through collective activity To promote the integration of Willingness to Participate in Urban Renewal, this study focuses on the problem of urban renewal resulting from collective action. Based on theories of collective action and trust, this study conducts a resident surveyof the designated urban renewal area adjoining the north of National Chengchi University in Taipei City to identify the relationships among five latent variables, namely cognition of urban renewal, social network, trustworthines and participation willingness. Factor analysis and Structural Equation Model (SEM) are used to examine the above issue. Validation results showed that level of trust positively and directly impacts local resident willingness to participate in the urban renewal project. Furthermore, cognition regarding urban renewal, social networks and trustworthiness can directly increase the level of trust, with trustworthiness being the most important factor and acting as a mediator between cognition regarding urban renewal and trustworthiness.

1. 林勝偉、顧忠華(2004)。社會資本的理論定位與經驗意義：以戰後台灣社會變遷為例。國立政治大學社會季報，37，113-66。
   連結：
2. Adger, W.(2003).Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change.Economic Geography,79(4),387-404.
3. Ahn, T. K.,Ostrom, E.(2002).Social capital and the second-generation theories of collective action: An analytical approach to the forms of social capital.The 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association,Boston:
4. Argyle, M.(1991).Co-operation: The Basis of Sociability.London:Routledge.
5. Boxmeer, B. V.,Beckhoven, E. V.(2005).Public-private partnership in urban regeneration: A comparison of dutch and spanish PPPs.European Journal of Housing Policy,5(1),1-16.
6. Buckner, J. C.(1988).The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion.American Journal of Community Psychology,16(6),771-791.
7. Clague, C.(ed.)(1997).Institutions and Economic Development: Growth and Governance in Less-Developed and Post-Socialist Countries.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Coleman, J. S.(1988).Social capital in the creation of human capital.American Journal of Sociology,94,95-121.
9. Doney, P. M.,Cannon, J. P.,Mullen, M. R.(1998).Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust.Academy of Management Review,23(3),601-620.
10. Fukuyama, F.(1995).Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity.New York:Free Press.
11. Granovetter, M.(1985).Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology,91,481-510.
12. Hardin, R.(2006).Trust.Malden:Polity Press.
13. Hosmer, L. T.(1995).Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics.Academy of Management Review,20(2),379-403.
14. Kramer, R. M.(ed.)Tyler, T.(ed.)(1996).Trust in Organizations.Newbury Park:Sage.
15. Lewis, J. D.,Weigert, A.(1985).Trust as a social reality.Social Force,63(4),967-985.
16. Lindskold, S.(1978).Trust development, the GRIT proposal, and the effects of conciliatory acts on conflict and cooperation.Psychological Bulletin,85(4),772-793.
17. Mayer, R. C.,Davis, J. H.,Schoorman, F. D.(1995).An integrative model of organizational trust.Academy of Management Review,20(3),709-734.
18. McAllister, D. H.(1995).Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations.Academy of Management Review,38(1),24-59.
19. Melucci, A.(1996).Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
20. Olson, M.(1971).The Logic of Collective Action.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
21. Olsson, P.,Folke, C.,Berkes, F.(2004).Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social ecological system.Environmental Management,34(1),75-90.
22. Ostrom, E.,Ahn, T. K.(2003).Foundations of Social Capital.Northampton:Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc..
23. Passy, F.(2003).Social networks matter: But how?.Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action,Oxford:
24. Putnam, R. D.(1993).Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy.New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
25. Putnam, R. D.(1993).The prosperous community: Social capital and public life.The American Prospect,4(13),35-42.
26. Rigdon, E. E.(1995).A necessary and sufficient identification rule for structural models estimated in practice.Multivariate Behavioral Research,30(3),359-383.
27. Rousseau, D. M.,Sitkin, S. B.,Burt, R. S.,Camerer, C.(1998).Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust.Academy of Management Review,23(3),393-404.
28. Sabadier, P. A.(ed.),Focht, W.(ed.),Lube, M.(ed.),Trachtenberg, Z.(ed.),Vedlitz, A.(ed.),Matlock, M.(ed.)(2005).Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management.Cambridge:MIT Press.
29. Shapiro, D.,Sheppard, B.,Cheraskin, L.(1992).Business on a handshake.The Negotiations Journal,8(4),356-377.
30. Torsvik, G.(2000).Social capital and economic development.Rationality and Society,12(4),451-476.
31. Wagner, C. L.,Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E.(2008).Does community-based collaborative resource management increase social capital?.Society and Natural Resources,21(4),324-344.
32. Zucker, L. G.(1986).Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure.Research in Organizational Behavior,8,53-111.
33. 江明修(2004)。,台北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
34. 李金桂(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學地政學系。
35. 陳恒鈞、劉逸雅(2009)。社會資本與都市再生計畫推動之關聯性─以大稻埕歷史風貌特定專用區再生計畫為例。台灣民主季刊，6(4)，49-99。
36. 陳欽春、王中天(2008)。,台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
37. 陳順宇(2005)。多變量分析。台北:華泰。
38. 劉麟書(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。銘傳大學管理科學研究所。
39. 鄭仁偉(2004)。,台北:行政院國家科學委員會。

1. 邊泰明、彭佩瑩、陳玉嬌(2017)。信任、互惠與都市更新合作意願相關性之研究。住宅學報，26(1)，1-29。
2. 蔡馨芳,郭昱瑩,余致力(2022)。2018年公務人員年金改革對我國文官態度之影響。行政暨政策學報，75，1-35。
3. 陳奉瑤、梁仁旭、沈文才(2016)。都市更新資訊透明度與報酬之關連。住宅學報，25(1)，77-97。
4. 胡海豐(2015)。都市更新、建築容積移轉與獎勵的經濟效率性。建築學報，93，105-124。
5. 胡海豐(2016)。從「都市治理」到「公司治理」：都市更新的可行性探討。都市與計劃，43(1)，31-57。
6. 柯于璋(2021)。我國都市更新之演進與後設治理。都市與計劃，48(3)，265-281。
7. 李婉鈺(2015)。社區居民自辦都市更新參與機制之擬議。土地問題研究季刊，14(3)，47-61。
8. 廖珮君、張金鶚、江穎慧(2017)。臺北市老屋健檢之政策分析。都市與計劃，44(1)，59-81。
9. 林伯威(2021)。都市計畫制度創新試驗之探討－以臺北市南港產業生活特定專用區推動都市更新為例。都市與計劃，48(3)，241-263。
10. 石振國(2014)。從方案評估理論反思《都市更新條例》。中華行政學報，15，7-25。
11. 張偉斌、張哲睿、吳韻吾(2016)。自力更新組織─參與都市更新意願影響因素之研究。物業管理學報，7(2)，17-28。
12. 鄭佳昆、周紓帆(2014)。以情境模擬討論地方改變對地方連結之影響：以臺大醉月湖為例。都市與計劃，41(4)，429-460。
13. (2024)。不動產估價的價格機率分布與稟賦效果。土地問題研究季刊，23(2)，58-77。