城市遺產與城市發展之衝突：以新加坡咖啡山為例

Conflict Urban Heritage and Urban Development: A Case Study in Singapore's Bukit Nanas

10.6128/CP.41.4.329

張碧君(Pi-Chun Chang)

文化遺產地景 ； 咖啡山 ； 全球城市 ； 墓葬空間 ； 土地利用 ； Heritage landscape ； Bukit Brown ； Global city ； Deathscape ； Land use

都市與計劃

41卷4期（2014 / 12 / 31）

329 - 355

繁體中文

自新加坡市區重建局於2011年9月宣佈，為了擴建道路與未來可能興建組屋的需求，咖啡山墳場將有部分被移作公用。由於咖啡山被認為是極具歷史意義的華人墳場，為了發展的理由而被移除，引發了一連串來自民間的質疑與挑戰，其中最大的呼籲是將咖啡山視為是國家性的遺產地景，並應予以保護。本文以此案例，探討在都市發展的思維下，墳場土地實用性與墓葬空間神聖性在新加坡的社會脈絡下產生何種對話與對立。本文首先回顧文化遺產地景與認同之相關理論，再來探討新加坡官方規劃下的文化遺產地景，來給予咖啡山爭議一個更大的脈絡，之後進行咖啡山案例分析。最後，本文對此案例歸納出四點意義：一、咖啡山代表了新加坡作為移民社會的歷史性，應能反映歷史記憶與國家認同；二、它代表了對過去遺產空間規劃政策的反思，更重要的是認為遺產空間應與生活經驗結合；三、此案例也對綠地空間的人工營造提出省思；四、對「公共利益」的界定提出質疑。

Taking Singapore's ＂Bukit Brown Cemetery＂ disputes as an example, this study examines the conflict between sacred and secular views of deathscapes in Singapore. In September 2011, the Singapore government announced that Bukit Brown Cemetery had been embarked for road construction to ease traffic congestion along the existing outer ring-road. In response, protests emerged with their focus being on sharing knowledge about the history and heritage value of Bukit Brown Cemetery. This study examines the debate regarding preserving the cemetery for its heritage value versus meeting the pragmatic needs of Singaporeans in the context of urban planning. Furthermore, as the government refuses to view the cemetery as national heritage, this study attempts to analyze the impractibility of Bukit Brown Cemetery becoming a nationalized preservation area in state discourses by providing a broader context of cultural heritage landscapes. Since this is a case in which the process of heritage site making is more a ground-up initiative than a state-sponsored enterprise, this debate on the heritage value of a cemetery suggests a shift in Singapore public discourse, whereby the sole pursuit of ＂national development＂ issues has become insufficient.

1. Hui, Y. F. (2012). Debating Bukit Brown: Bringing a cemetery to life in Singapore, International Institute for Asian Studies (IIAS) Newsletter, http://www. iias.nl/sites/default/files/IIAS-NL62-424344.pdf, (Apr. 12, 2012).
2. Hui, Y. F. (2012b). Recording for posterity, The Peranakan Association, http://www.peranakan.org.sg/2012/08/recording-for-posterity/, (Oct. 12, 2013).
3. The Committee on Heritage (1988).The Committee on Heritage Report, Singapore: Committee on Heritage.The Committee on Heritage (1988).The Committee on Heritage Report, Singapore: Committee on Heritage.,未出版
4. Altman, I.(ed.),Werner, C.(ed.)(1985).Home Environment.New York:Plenum.
5. Castells, M.(1975).The Urban Question.London:Edward Arnold.
6. Chang, T. C.(2000).Theming cities, taming places: Insights from Singapore.Geografiska Annaler,82 B(1),35-54.
7. Cheng, L. K.(1990).Reflections on the changing roles of Chinese clan associations.Asian Culture,14(April),57-71.
8. Chia, L.S.(ed.),Rahman, A.(ed.),Tay, D.(ed.)(1991).The Biophysical Environment of Singapore.Singapore:Singapore University Press.
9. Chua, B. H.(1995).Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore.London:Routledge.
10. Easthope, H.(2009).Fixed identities in a mobile world? The relationship between mobility, place, and identity.Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power,16(1),61-82.
11. Easthope, H.(2004).A place called home.Housing, Theory and Society,21(3),128-138.
12. Gieryn, T.(2000).A space for place in sociology.Annual Reviews of Sociology,26(1),463-496.
13. Gillies, J. R.(ed.)(1994).Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
14. Goh, C. T.(1988).Our national ethic.Speeches: A Bimonthly Selection of Ministerial Speeches,12(5),12-15.
15. Government of Singapore(1991).Singapore: The Next Lap.Singapore:Times Editions.
16. Gruffudd, P.(1994).Back to the land: Historiography, rurality, and the nation in interwar Wales.Transactions, Institute of British Geographer,19(1),61-77.
17. Hardy, D.(1988).Historical geography and heritage studies.Area,20(4),333-338.
18. Harvey, D.(1977).Social Justice and the City.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. Hebbert, M.(2005).The street as locus of collective memory.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,23(4),581-596.
20. Henderson, J.(2000).Attracting tourists to Singapore's Chinatown: A case study in conservation and promotion.Tourism Management,21(5),525-534.
21. Hitchcock, M.,King, V.(2003).Discourses with the past: Tourism and heritage in Southeast Asia.Indonesia and the Malay World,31(89),3-15.
22. Hoelscher, S.,Alderman, D. H.(2004).Memory and place: Geographies of a critical relationship.Social and Cultural Geography,5(3),347-355.
23. Hong, L.,Huang, J.(2008).The Scripting of a National History: Singapore and Its Pasts.Singapore:National University of Singapore.
24. Huff, W. G.(1994).The Economic Growth of Singapore.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
25. Johnson, N.(1995).Cast in stone: Monuments, geography, and nationalism.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,13(1),51-65.
26. Jones, O.,Garde-Hansen, J.(2012).Introduction.Geography and Memory: Explorations in Identity, Place and Becoming,New York:
27. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B.(1998).Destination of Culture: Tourism, Museums and Heritage.Berkeley:University of California Press.
28. Kong, L.,Yeoh, B. S. A.(2003).The Politics of Landscapes in Singapore.Sycracuse:Syracuse University Press.
29. Lim, I.(1993).Clarke quay: Singapore's first riverside festival village.Changi,1993(October),21-24.
30. Lowenthal, D.(1998).The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
31. Macdonald, S.(ed.)(2006).A Companion to Museum Studies.Malden:Blackwell.
32. Marcuse, P.(ed.),Van Kempen, R.(ed.)(2000).Globalizing Cities: A New Spatial Order?.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers.
33. Massey, D.,Jess, P.(1995).A Place in the World? Places, Cultures and Globalization.Oxford:Open University Press.
34. Ooi, G. L.(ed.)(1995).Environment and the City: Sharing Singapore's Experiences and Future Challenges.Singapore:The Institute of Policy Studies.
35. Sandhu, K. S.(ed.),Wheatley, P.(ed.)(1989).Management of Success: The Moulding of Modern Singapore.Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
36. Savage, V.,Huang, S.,Chang, T. C.(2004).The Singapore River thematic zone: Sustainable tourism in an urban context.The Geographical Journal,170(3),212-225.
37. Singapore Tourism Board(1996).Destination Singapore: The Arts Experience.Singapore:Singapore Tourism Board.
38. Singapore Tourism Board(1996).Tourism 21: Vision of a Tourism Capital.Singapore:Singapore Tourism Board.
39. Taylor, K.(2009).Cultural landscapes and Asia: Reconciling international and Southeast Asian regional values.Landscape Research,34(1),7-31.
40. Teo, P.,Huang, S.(1995).Tourism and heritage conservation in Singapore.Annals of Tourism Research,22(3),589-615.
41. Teo, P.,Yeoh, B.,Ooi, G. L.,Lai, K. P. Y.(2004).Changing Landscapes of Singapore.Singapore:McGraw-Hill Education.
42. Tourism Task Force(1984).Report of the Tourism Task Force.Singapore:Ministry of Trade and Industry.
43. Urban Redevelopment Authority(1985).URA Annual Report 1984-85.Singapore:Urban Redevelopment Authority.
44. Urban Redevelopment Authority(1988).Historic Districts in the Central Area: A Mannual for Little India Conservation Area.Singapore:Urban Redevelopment Authority.
45. Yen, C. H.(1986).A Social History of the Chinese in Singapore and Malaya, 1800-1911.Singapore:Oxford University Press.
46. Yeo, G.(1989).Importance of heritage and identity.Speeches: A Bimonthly Selection of Ministerial Speeches,13(1),47-49.
47. Yeoh, B. S. A.(ed.),Kong, L.(ed.)(1995).Portraits of Places: History, Community, and Identity in Singapore.Singapore:Times Editions.
48. Yeoh, B. S. A.(ed.),Kong, L.(ed.)(1995).Portraits of Places: History, Community and Identity in Singapore.Singapore:Times Editions.
49. Yeoh, B. S. A.,Hui, T. B.(1995).The politics of space: Changing discourses on Chinese burial grounds in post-war Singapore.Journal of Historical Geography,21(2),184-201.
50. Yeoh, B. S. A.,Kong, L.(1994).Reading landscape meanings: State constructions and lived experiences in Singapore's Chinatown.Habitat International,18(4),17-35.
51. Yuen, B.(2005).Searching for place identity in Singapore.Habitat International,29(2),197-214.
52. 吳幸玲、林潤華(2005)。東南亞之社會與文化地理學。地理學報，40，1-16。

1. 郭育安(2019)。世界文化遺產的地方新想像：馬來西亞燕窩產業、檳城遺產實作、人與動物的邊界地帶。地理學報，94，27-53。
2. 賴子儀,王志弘(2021)。亡者的文化迴響：臺灣爭議性墓葬襲產化的空間政治。地理研究，73，103-138。