臺北市老屋健檢之政策分析

Policy Analysis of the Taipei Old Building Inspection Plan

10.6128/CP.44.1.59

廖珮君(Pei-Chun Liao)；江穎慧(Ying-Hui Chiang)；張金鶚(Chin-Oh Chang)

老屋健檢 ； 住宅性能 ； 建物安全 ； 都市更新 ； Old building inspection plan ； Dwelling performance ； Building safety ； Urban renewal

都市與計劃

44卷1期（2017 / 03 / 31）

59 - 81

繁體中文

透過老屋健檢檢視居住安全，有助於居民選擇合適的療法防止建物持續劣化。2016 年2月6 日高雄美濃地震引發社會對於建物安全的關注。2013 年臺北市以人體健康檢查概念首創老屋健檢計畫，健檢對居民後續行動的影響及其政策成效乃本文焦點。本文以2013 和2014年臺北市老屋健檢申請案件及屋齡20 年以上之公寓大廈社區為調查樣本，從個體面探討老屋健檢對居民改善環境意願的影響以及健檢與否導致後續行為之機率差異，並就總體面估計政策之成本效益。研究結果顯示，曾參與健檢者有意改善環境之機率較高，居民在建物設備及外牆安全健檢結果越差時，將增加改造環境的可能性；就總體面來說，現行政策投入少量成本即獲得可觀效益，顯示老屋健檢政策應持續執行。

Old buildings must be inspected to ensure the safety of residents and to select adequate methods of preventing building deterioration.The many deaths caused by the 0206 earthquake have aroused widespread social concern about building safety. In 2013, an old building inspection plan was established by the Taipei City government based on the concept of health examination. Therefore, this study evaluated the effectiveness of the policy and its effect on the subsequent actions of relevant residents. The survey targeted old building inspection application cases in 2013 and 2014 as well as ≥20 years old apartment buildings in Taipei City. From the perspective of individual residents, this study investigated how inspection of old buildings affected the willingness of residents to improve their living environment as well as the likelihood that they engaged in such action. The policy effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the program were also estimated from a comprehensive perspective.The analysis results showed that residents who had participated in the examination were likely to be interested in improving their living environment. Poor outcomes of building facility and outer wall examination also increased the likelihood of the residents to transform their living environment. From a comprehensive perspective, the current policy should be continued because it provides substantial benefits with little investment.

1. 王建翔、賴榮平、謝宏仁、黃士賓(2010)。永續發展下既有公寓大廈共用建築設備更新改造需求研究。建築學報，71，133-152。
   連結：
2. 王建翔、謝宏仁、賴榮平、黃士賓(2010)。既有公寓大廈更新改造診斷模式與需求－以共用部份噪音、採光照明、空氣品質、隔熱遮陽更新改造為例。建築學報，74，1-26。
   連結：
3. 江立偉、郭斯傑、張智元(2014)。建築物外牆磁磚劣化目視診斷模式之研究。建築學報，87，49-66。
   連結：
4. 黃世孟、江立偉、李姿葶、賴玉恩(2010)。建築屋主觀點對於建築物健康診斷與定期檢查共識之研究。建築學報，71，233-253。
   連結：
5. 楊詩弘、粘世孟(2012)。臺北市建築物外牆維護管理評估指標制定之研究。建築學報，82，1-20。
   連結：
6. 邊泰明、黃泳涵(2013)。信任與都市更新參與意願之研究。都市與計劃，40(1)，1-29。
   連結：
7. 住宅性能評價表示協會（2016），住宅性能表示制度とは，「一般社團法人住宅性能評價表示協會」，http://www.hyoukakyoukai.or.jp/seido/info.html，2016 年2 月12 日
8. 香港房屋協會與市區重建局（2013），強制驗樓資助計劃，「市區重建局」，http://www.ura.org.hk/tc/，2016 年2 月12 日。
9. 內政部營建署（2015），私有建築物耐震性能評估補強推動先行計畫，「中華民國內政部營建署全球資訊網」，http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php，2016 年2 月12 日。
10. 屋宇署（2013b），強制驗窗計劃，「香港特別行政區政府屋宇署」，http://www.bd.gov.hk/chineseT/services/index_mwis.html，2016 年2 月12 日
11. 臺北市建築管理工程處（2013），老屋健檢，「臺北市建築管理工程處」，http://pkl.gov.taipei/mp.asp?mp=118021，2016 年2 月12 日。
12. 國土交通省（2016），住宅の品質確保の促進等に関する法律に基づく住宅性能表示制度の実施状況について（平成25 年度確報値），「國土交通省」，http://www.mlit.go.jp/index.html，2016 年2 月19 日。
13. 屋宇署（2013a），強制驗樓計劃，「香港特別行政區政府屋宇署」，http://www.bd.gov.hk/chineseT/services/index_mbis.html，2016 年2 月12 日
14. Chan, D. W. M.,Choi, T. N.Y.(2015).Difficulties in executing the Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme (MBIS) for existing private buildings in Hong Kong.Habitat International,48,97-105.
15. Chan, D. W. M.,Hung, H. T. W.(2015).An empirical survey of the perceived benefits of implementing the Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme (MBIS) in Hong Kong.Facilities,33(5/6),337-366.
16. Chan, K. H.(2012).Improving building safety in property maintenance.Property Management,30(5),465-476.
17. Greene, W. H.(2002).LIMDEP Version 8.0 Econometric Modeling Guide.New York:Econometric Software Inc..
18. Greenwald, P.,Nasca, P. C.,Lawrence, C. E.,Horton, J.,McGarrah, R. P.,Gabriele, T.,Carlton, K.(1978).Estimated effect of breast self-examination and routine physician examinations on breast-cancer mortality.New England Journal of Medicine,299(6),271-273.
19. Ho, D. C. W.,Chau, K. W.,Cheung, A. K. C.,Yau, Y.,Wong, S. K.,Leung, H. F.,Lau, S. S. Y.,Wong, W. S.(2008).A survey of the health and safety conditions of apartment buildings in Hong Kong.Building and Environment,43(5),764-775.
20. Ho, D. C. W.,Leung, H. F.,Wong, S. K.,Cheung, A. K. C.,Lau, S. S. Y.,Wong, W. S.,Lung, D. P. Y.,Chau, K. W.(2004).Assessing the health and hygiene performance of apartment buildings.Facilities,22(3/4),58-69.
21. Ho, D. C. W.,Yau, Y.,Law, C. K.,Poon, S. W.,Yip, H. K.,Liusman, E.(2012).Social sustainability in urban renewal: An assessment of community aspirations.Urbani Izziv,23(1),125-139.
22. Hui, E. C. M.,Wong, J. T. Y.,Wan, J. K. M.(2008).The evidence of value enhancement resulting from rehabilitation.Facilities,26(1/2),16-32.
23. Jatoi, I.(2011).The impact of advances in treatment on the efficacy of mammography screening.Preventive Medicine,53(3),103-104.
24. Jatoi, I.,Miller, A. B.(2003).Why is breast-cancer mortality declining?.The Lancet Oncology,4(4),251-254.
25. Lawrence, R. S.,Mickalide, A. D.(1987).Preventive services in clinical practice: Designing the periodic health examination.JAMA,257(16),2205-2207.
26. Leavell, H. R.,Clark, E. G.(1965).Preventive Medicine for the Doctor in His Community: An Epidemiologic Approach.New York:McGraw-Hill.
27. Lin, C. C.,Ko, C. Y.,Liu, J. P.,Lee, Y. L.,Chie, W. C.(2011).Nationwide periodic health examinations promote early treatment of hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia in adults: Experience from Taiwan.Public Health,125(4),187-195.
28. Mayer, N. S.(1981).Rehabilitation decisions in rental housing: An empirical analysis.Journal of Urban Economics,10(1),76-94.
29. Menard, S.(1995).Applied Logistic Regression Analysis.California:Sage Publications.
30. Poirot, J. W.(1995).Urban regeneration and environmental challenge.Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice,121(1),59-61.
31. Shear, W. B.(1983).Urban housing rehabilitation and move decisions.Southern Economic Journal,49(4),1030-1052.
32. Spivack, R. N.(1991).The determinants of housing maintenance and upkeep: A case study of Providence, Rhode Island.Applied Economics,23(4),639-646.
33. Stevens, C. A.(1995).Public housing redevelopment as social policy.Urban Policy and Research,13(2),81-88.
34. Yau, Y.(2008).Building conditions in Yau Tsim Mong, Hong Kong: Appraisal, exploration and estimation.Journal of Building Appraisal,3(4),319-329.
35. Yau, Y.,Chau, K. W.,Ho, D. C. M.,Wong, S. K.(2008).An empirical study on the positive externality of building refurbishment.International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis,1(1),19-32.
36. Yau, Y.,Ho, D. C. W.,Chau, K. W.,Lau, W. Y.(2009).Estimation algorithm for predicting the performance of private apartment buildings in Hong Kong.Structural Survey,27(5),372-389.
37. Yau, Y.,Ho, D. C. W.,Poon, S. W.(2010).Sustainable development in urban renewal in Hong Kong: A physical assessment.Proceedings of SB10mad Sustainable Building
38. Yau, Y.,Ho, L. C.(2008).To rehabilitate or redevelop? A study of the decision criteria for urban regeneration projects.Journal of Place Management and Development,1(3),272-291.
39. 丁育群(2005)。建立住宅性能評估制度之研究（四）。臺北:內政部建築研究所。
40. 王濟川、郭志剛(2004)。Logistic 回歸模型─方法及應用。臺北:五南出版社。
41. 宋國華(2007)。住宅性能評價制度－日本經驗。營建知訊，228，36-43。
42. 財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會(2015)。2014 年都市更新回顧。都市更新簡訊，65，1-24。
43. 許雅雯、葉慧容、黃戊田、林麗華、吳敏欣、洪于婷、蔡新茂、林指宏(2015)。健康促進。臺北:新文京出版社。
44. 陳品玲。流行病學概論。臺北:華杏出版股份有限公司。
45. 曾屏輝、林鴻儒、邱瀚模、李百卿、吳明賢、陳明豐(2009)。從實證醫學角度看自費健康檢查。內科學誌，20(6)，532-543。
46. 黃世孟、江立偉、陳振華(2010)。建築物外牆公共安全目視診斷評估方法之研究。物業管理學報，1(1)，35-44。
47. 黃紀、王德育(2012)。質變數與受限依變數的迴歸分析。臺北:五南出版社。
48. 楊逸詠(2003)。建立住宅性能評估制度之研究（二）。臺北:內政部建築研究所。