题名

現行都市計畫通盤檢討中防災空間規劃落實成效與課題之探討

并列篇名

Implementation of Urban Disaster Reduction Spatial Planning in the Periodical Overall Review of Urban Planning

DOI

10.6128/CP.45.1.25

作者

吳杰穎(Jie-Ying Wu);何明錦(Ming-Chin Ho)

关键词

都市防災空間規劃 ; 防災規劃 ; 都市計畫通盤檢討 ; Urban disasters reduction spatial planning ; Hazards mitigation planning ; Urban planning periodical overall review

期刊名称

都市與計劃

卷期/出版年月

45卷1期(2018 / 03 / 31)

页次

25 - 51

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

過去台灣都市防災空間規劃,多依據1997年修訂之「都市計畫定期通盤檢討實施辦法」第七條內容,著重於災害之整備與應變規劃。2011年,為因應近年都市水患問題,針對實施辦法條文內容進行增修、開始納入水患治理與減災概念。然而,過去鮮少有相關的研究,探討過去十多年來防災空間規劃於都市計畫通盤檢討中之落實成效。因此,本研究透過專家問卷及層級分析法,來建立都市防災空間規劃落實成效之評估指標體系,並對全台350個都市計畫通盤檢討案進行成效評估。評估結果發現,雖都市防災空間規劃成效有漸佳之趨勢,但整體而言,僅34%之都市計畫具備一定程度之防災空間規劃。消防救災路線是被採用比例最高的規劃項目,避難收容場所次之,火災延燒防止帶最低。本研究更進一步透過深度訪談及專家座談法,掌握防災空間規劃不易落實之課題,包括:規劃團隊缺乏防災專業背景及相關災害資料之取得管道;都市計劃之防災空間規劃與「地區災害防救計畫」定位不清;都市計畫通盤檢討預算過低;都市計畫審議不甚重視防災規劃等。最後,本研究建議可透過前瞻計畫水環境建設計畫經費,來解決都市防災規劃經費不足之困境;都市計畫審計明定防災規劃審議原則;及未來的都市防災規劃必須要與「地區災害防救計畫」進行對話。

英文摘要

The 1997 revision of the ordinance for the periodical review of urban planning became the base for the urban disasters reduction spatial planning. To cope with recent floods, this ordinance had some amendment in 2011 changing the concept from hazards preparedness to mitigation. In the past 10 years, very few studies have reviewed the implementation performance of the urban disaster reduction spatial planning in the periodical overall review of urban planning. Therefore, the above ordinance and the urban disaster reduction spatial planning handbooks were used to review the implementation performance through experts' questionnaires and AHP method. Moreover, this study performed in-depth interviews to understand the difficulties on the implementations. This study figures out that the implementation performance of urban disaster reduction planning on the periodical overall review of urban plans was gradually better. However, only 34% of the cases in the 350 ones have implementation performance to a certain degree. Fire and rescue routes planning is the most frequently adopted measured, and shelter planning is the second most frequently adopted. Planning for fire spread is the lest frequent adapted measure. Four difficulties of implementations were also revealed: (1) the urban planners lack the training on the disaster related professionals; (2) the limited budgets for periodical overall review of urban planning; (3) the confusion of urban disaster reduction spatial planning and the local disaster management planning, and (4) the lack of emphasis on disaster related planning by urban review committees. Finally, this study suggests overcoming the limitation of the planning budget through the "Water environment plan" under the "Forward Plan"; drawing up the review principles for the urban disaster reduction planning on the periodical overall review of urban plans; dialoguing between the periodical overall review of urban planning and the "local disaster management planning".

主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. 吳杰穎、李玉生(2010)。非結構式減災措施運用於空間規劃與管理之研究。建築學報,72,169-186。
    連結:
  2. Berke, P. R.(1996).Enhancing plan quality: Evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,39(1),79-96.
  3. Berke, P. R.,Beatley, T.(1992).Planners for Earthquakes: Risks, Politics, and Policy.Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  4. Berke, P. R.,French, S. P.(1994).The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality.Journal of Planning Education and Research,13(4),237-250.
  5. Blanchard, B. W.(2008).Guide to Emergency Management and Related Terms, Definitions, Concepts, Acronyms, Organizations, Programs, Guidance, Executive Orders & Legislation: A Tutorial on Emergency Management, Broadly Defined, Past and Present.Washington:Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  6. Brikland, T. A.,Burby, R. J.,Conrad, D.,Cortner, H.,Michener, W. K.(2003).River ecology and flood hazard mitigation.Natural Hazard Review,4(1),46-54.
  7. Brody, S. D.(2003).Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazards.Journal of Planning Education and Research,23(2),191-201.
  8. Burby, R. J.(ed.)(1998).Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazard with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities.Washington:Joseph Henry Press.
  9. Burby, R. J.,Dalton, L. C.(1994).Plan can matter! The role of land use plans and state planning mandates in limiting the development of hazardous areas.Public Administration,54(3),229-238.
  10. Dalton, L. C.,Burby, R. J.(1994).Mandates, plans, and planners: Building local commitment to development management.Journal of the American Planning Association,60(4),444-461.
  11. Godschalk, D. R.(2003).Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities.Natural Hazards Review,4(3),136-143.
  12. Saaty, T. L.(2004).Decision making- the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP).Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,13(1),1-35.
  13. Schwab, A. K.,Sandler, D.,Brower, D. J.(2016).Hazard Mitigation and Preparedness: An Introductory Text for Emergency Management and Planning Professionals.Boca Raton:Chemical Rubber Company Press.
  14. Schwab, J.,Eschelbach, K.,Brower, D. J.(2006).Hazard Mitigation and Preparedness: Building Resilient Communities.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Smith, K.(2013).Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster.New York:Routledge.
  16. Son, C. H.,Baek, J. I.,Ban, Y. U.,Ha, S. R.(2015).The effects of mitigation measures on flood damage prevention in Korea.Sustainability,7(12),16866-16884.
  17. UNISDR(2013).Making Cities Resilient: Summary for Policymakers.Geneva:United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.
  18. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction=UNISDR(2009).UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction.Geneva:United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.
  19. 內政部(2015),「內政部統計年報」,臺北:內政部。
  20. 內政部營建署(2013)。內政部營建署(2013),「都市總合治水綱要計畫」,臺北:內政部營建署。
  21. 何明錦、李威儀(1998)。,新北:內政部建築研究所。
  22. 何明錦、洪鴻智、詹士樑、王暉堯(2007)。都市防災空間系統手冊彙編增修。新北:內政部建築研究所。
  23. 吳杰穎、鄭春發、鄭國泰(2006)。考量減災觀點之都市計畫通盤檢討防災規劃:以淡海新市鎮特定區為例。環境與世界,14,70-92。
  24. 李威儀、丁育群(2003)。都市防災與災後應變研究計畫(子計畫一):都市防災規劃手冊研修及辦理中日交流研討會。新北:內政部建築研究所。
  25. 李威儀、錢學陶、李咸亨(1997)。,臺北:台北市政府都市發展局。
  26. 張益三、李佩瑜(1999)。以鄰里單元的理論觀點來探討都市防災計畫。第六屆海峽兩岸環境保護研討會,高雄:
  27. 陳亮全、賴美茹、何興亞(2002)。臺北市防救災合作計畫成果報告。臺北:防災國家型科技計畫辦公室。
  28. 楊礎毓(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園,銘傳大學。
  29. 熊光華、顏振嘉(2001)。,新北:內政部消防署。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡綽芳、黃繼霆、吳杰穎、何天河(2017)。現行各縣市區域計畫中防災規劃之課題。建築與規劃學報,18(2),93-112。
  2. (2024)。臺北市永春街聚落之分區變更與回饋爭議評析。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,24,120-136。