地震風險地區土地使用規劃與土地利用關聯性分析－以車籠埔斷層為例

The Association of Land Use Planning and Land Use in Earthquake Risk Area - A Case Study of Chelungpu Fault

10.6128/CP.201806_45(2).0003

陳姿伶(Tzu-Ling Chen)；張學聖(Hsueh-Sheng Chan)

地震風險地區 ； 土地使用規劃 ； 全域型空間自相關係數 ； 地域指標空間關聯性 ； Earthquake risk area ； Land use planning ； Global spatial autocorrelation coefficients (SAC) ； Local indicators of spatial association (LISA)

都市與計劃

45卷2期（2018 / 06 / 30）

161 - 185

繁體中文

地震風險地區土地使用規劃必須因地制宜，正確的解讀地震風險資訊為土地使用規劃的基石，引導未來開發遠離已知災害風險地區，或是針對受災嚴重地區或已知災害風險而短期或永久強制居民遷離原本的居住環境。地震風險地區土地使用規劃手段包括環境影響報告、不動產資訊公開、土地徵收與稅式政策等，各類土地使用規劃手段的效性與適性皆應進行評量。長期以來，規劃權與財產權在風險資訊、因應措施等資訊落差，加乘兼負著不對等的責任，具差異性的「有限最適」決策致使土地使用規劃長期受到必要性、合理性與影響性的爭論。車籠埔斷層於921集集地震後，沿線都市計畫區據以劃設斷層限建區與修訂相關的土地使用分區圖與土地使用分區管制，本文應用全域型空間自相關統計與地域指標空間關聯性判釋建築使用變遷的空間分佈特性，期探究地震災害風險地區土地使用規劃之影響。

Land use planning in earthquake risk area should take local characteristics into account. The accurate interpretation of earthquake risk information might help to steer future development away from or practice short-term or eternal relocation in existing risk area. Multiple approaches of land use planning have been applied to earthquake risk area including environmental impact assessment, real estate disclosure, land acquisition and taxation, and both suitability and efficacy of land use planning approaches should be evaluated. However, due to planners and ownership receive different risk information, limited resource and responsibility, the varied limitedly appropriate decisions have confronted challenges including necessity, rationality and impact. After 921 Chi-Chi Earthquake in 1999 in Taiwan, 15 meter from the each side of fault line has been identified as fault zone area on urban planning map. Therefore, this paper applies global spatial autocorrelation coefficients (SAC) and local indicators of spatial association (LISA) to building use change exploring spatial distribution feature. As a whole, the purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of land use planning in earthquake risk area.

1. 李俊霖(2009)。全球氣候變遷下社經代謝作用與土地利用變遷之空間型態：SEMLUC模型之應用。都市與計劃，36(4)，445-472。
   連結：
2. 張學聖、劉佩佳(2015)。考量空間關聯之地區洪災脆弱性研究以雲林縣易淹水地區為例。地理學報，79，1-29。
   連結：
3. 陳怡睿、謝舜傑、陳沛靖(2011)。土壤液化敏感區土地開發適宜性之研究。建築學報，76，131-150。
   連結：
4. 鄒克萬、黃書偉(2007)。都市土地利用變遷對自然環境衝擊之空間影響分析。地理學報，48，1-18。
   連結：
5. 賴進貴、葉高華、王韋力(2004)。土地利用變遷與空間相依性之探討以臺北盆地聚落變遷為例。臺灣地理資訊學刊，1，29-40。
   連結：
6. 蘇瑛敏、蔡承璋(2003)。活動斷層帶限制發展處理機制與策略評估之研究。都市與計劃，30(4)，301-323。
   連結：
7. Alesch, D. A.,Arendt, L. A.,Holly, J. N.(2008).Managing for the Long-term Community Recovery in the Aftermath of Disaster.Fairfax:Public Entity Risk Institute.
8. Allen, K. M.(2006).Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: Local capacity-building in the Philippines.Disasters,30(1),81-101.
9. Anselin, L.(2010).Local indicators of spatial association -LISA.Geographical Analysis,27(2),93-115.
10. Athanasopoulou, E.,Despoiniadou, V.,Dritsos, S.(2008).The impact of earthquakes on the city of Aigio in Greece. Urban planning as a factor in mitigating seismic damage.2008 Seismic Engineering Conference Commemorating the 1908 Messina and Reggio Calabria Earthquake,Reggio Calabtia:
11. Becker, J. S.,Beban, J.,Saunders, W. S. A.,Van Dissen, R.,King, A.(2013).Land use planning and policy for earthquakes in the Wellington region, New Zealand (2001-2011).Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies,2013(1),3-16.
12. Bolton, P. A.,Heikkala, S. G.,Greene, M. M.,May, P. J.(1986).Land Use Planning for Earthquake Hazard Mitigation: A Handbook for Planners.Boulder:Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center.
13. Brookshire, D. S.,D'agre, R. C.,Schulze, W. D.,Thayer, M. A.(1982).Valuing public goods: A comparison of survey and hedonic approaches.American Economic Review,72(1),165-177.
14. Burby, R. J.(2006).Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise government decisions for hazardous areas.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,604(1),171-191.
15. CEDIM=Center for Disaster Management(2001).Urban risk management or national disasters: A research planning workshop
16. Coburn, A.,Spence, R.(2002).Earthquake Protection.England:West Sussex.
17. Drabek, T. E.(ed.),Hoetmer, G. J.(ed.)(1991).Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government.Washington:International City Management Association.
18. FEMA=Federal Emergency Management Agency(2003).State and Local Mitigation Planning How-to Guide: Integrating Manmade Hazards into Mitigation Planning.Washington:FEMA.
19. Fischer, F.(2000).Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge.Durham:Duke University Press.
20. Fischer, M. M.,Getis, A.(2010).Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis.London:Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht.
21. Fordham, M.(2007).Disaster and Development Research and Practice: A Necessary Eclecticism?.New York:Springer.
22. Fra.Paleo, U.(2015).Risk Governance, the Articulation of Hazard, Politics and Ecology.Dordrecht:Springer.
23. Friedmann, J.(1987).Planning in The Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action.Princeton:Princeton University.
24. Goodchild, M. F.(1986).Spatial Autocorrelation.Norwich:GeoBooks.
25. James, E.(2008).Getting ahead of the next disaster: Recent preparedness efforts in Indonesia.Development in Practice,18(3),424-429.
26. Kerr, J.,Nathan, S.,Van Dissen, R. J.,Webb, P.,Brunsdon, D.,King, A. B.(2003).Planning for Development of Land on or Close to Active Faults: A Guideline to Assist Resource Management Planners in New Zealand.Wellington:Ministry for the Environment.
27. LeDrew, E. F.,Holden, H.,Wulder, M. A.,Derksen, C.,Newman, C.(2004).A spatial statistical operator applied to multidate satellite imagery for identification of coral reef stress.Remote Sensing of Environment,91(3-4),271-279.
28. Lin, Y.(2009).Texas,Texas A&M University.
29. Lipman Development Strategies(2008).An Action Plan for Bourne's Downtown.Brewster:Lipman Development Strategies, LLC.
30. McGinnis, A.(2004).Standford,Standford University.
31. Morduch, J. C.,Sings, H.,Thayer, M.(1993).The impact of natural hazards on housing values: The loma prieta earthquake.Real Estate Economics,21(2),167-184.
32. Pearson, D. M.(2002).The application of local measures of spatial autocorrelation for describing pattern in north Australian landscapes.Journal of Environmental Management,64(1),85-95.
33. Reitherman, R.(1992).The effectiveness of fault zone regulations in California.Earthquake Spectra,8(1),57-77.
34. Rodriguez, H.(ed.),Quarantelli, E. L.(ed.),Dynes, R.(ed.)(2006).Handbook of Disaster Research.New York:Springer.
35. Southworth, J.,Maxted, P. F. L.,Smalley, B.(2004).Eclipsing binaries in open clusters - II. V453 Cyg in NGC 6871.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society,351(4),1277-1289.
36. Spence, R.(ed.),So, E.(ed.),Scawthorn, C.(ed.)(2011).Human Casualties in Earthquakes.Dordrecht:Springer.
37. Tobler, W. R.(1970).A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region.Economic Geography,46,234-240.
38. Van Zandt, S.,Peacock, W. G.,Highfield, W.,Xiao, Y.(2009).Housing inequalities and social vulnerability: Findings from 2008's Hurricane IKE.Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Annual Meeting,Crystal City:
39. Weaver, W. C.(1990).Earthquake events and real estate portfolios: A survey result.The Journal of Real Estate Research,5(2),277-280.
40. White, G. F.,Kates, R. W.,Burton, I.(2001).Knowing better and losing even more: The use of knowledge in hazards management.Environmental Hazards,3(3),81-92.
41. Wong, D. W. S.,Lee, J.(2005).Statistical Analysis of Geographic Information with ArcView and ArcGIS.New York:Wiley.
42. 內政部國土測繪中心（2017），「國土利用調查成果資訊專區」，http://lui.nlsc.gov.tw/Home/Content_Home.aspx，2018 年4 月15 日 。
43. 李以德(2004)。由比例原則析論我國國家考試消極應考資格規定之合憲性基礎。通識研究集刊，6，233-259。
44. 李錫堤、康耿豪、鄭錦桐、廖啟雯(2000)。921 集集大地震之地表破裂及地盤變形現象。地工技術，81，5-16。
45. 周鴻昇、楊清源、謝百鍾、余明山、高耀宏(2000)。投地區地工震災調查與分析。地工技術，81，69-84。
46. 林冠瑋、陳宏宇、張睿明(2014)。地表振動之偵測技術應用於大型山崩之研究。工程環境會刊，33，27-44。
47. 林裕彬、朱宏杰、吳振發(2011)。土地使用變遷模式回顧與比較。國土資訊系統通訊，77，46-53。
48. 林銘郎、李崇正、黃文昭、黃文正、粘為東、詹佩臻、張有毅、劉桓吉、盧詩丁、陳盈璇(2012)。活動斷層近地表特性研究（2/4）。臺北:經濟部中央地質調查所。
49. 柯于璋(2008)。土地使用減災工具之政策規劃可行性評估：模糊德爾菲層級法之應用。行政暨政策學報，47，57-90。
50. 柯明淳、黃明偉、林聖琪(2016)。地震山崩快速潛勢評估建立與應用。土木水利，43，17-26。
51. 紀雲曜(2011)。自然災害風險評估。臺北:滄海書局。
52. 翁作新、褚炳麟、林炳森(2000)。員林、霧峰及南投地區土壤液化特性。地工技術，81，47-56。
53. 陳斗生(2000)。如何與斷層及地震相處－地工設計之考量。地工技術，81，121-132。
54. 陳新民(1992)。憲法基本權利之基本理論。臺北:三民書局。
55. 趙志銘(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺南，成功大學建築研究所。
56. 蔡婷鈺、葉怡成、鄒明誠、李振民(2007)。以六種資料探勘方法分析影響集集大地震引起山崩之重要因子。中華林學季刊，40(1)，69-79。
57. 蕭江碧、葉祥海、蔡克銓(1999)。921 集集大地震建築物震害調查初步報告。臺北:內政部建築研究所。
58. 蕭謙麗、林明聖(2010)。九二一地震與車籠埔斷層的省思。環境教育季刊，41，8-13。
59. 簡文郁、張毓文、邱市彬(2011)。近斷層設計地震調整因子研究。臺北:財團法人國家實驗研究院國家地震工程研究中心。
60. 藍百圻(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺南，成功大學建築研究所。
61. 蘇鼎鈞、王劍虹(2000)。員林地區集集大地震土壤液化評估案例探討。地工技術，81，57-68。