學校災害管理評估指標系統之建立

Assessment Indicator System of School Disaster Management

10.6128/CP.202003_47(1).0004

王价巨(Jieh-Jiuh Wang)；蔡寧又(Ning-Yu Tsai)

災害管理 ； 校園安全 ； 降低災害風險 ； 韌性 ； 防災校園計畫 ； 網路層級分析法 ； Disaster management ； School safety ； Disaster risk reduction ； Resilience ； School disaster management program ； Analytic network process

都市與計劃

47卷1期（2020 / 03 / 31）

87 - 109

繁體中文

近年來全球各地災害發生頻繁且衝擊加劇，全球災害管理趨勢開始強調整體社會災害韌性之建構。學校在災害防救思維的啟蒙與啟動，及作為社區防災知識提供皆扮演了重要角色。為提升學校因應災害之韌性、降低災害衝擊，並協助學校確認防災工作之完整性，本文為延續性之研究成果，由Wang（2016）建構之校園災害管理架構為基礎，進而運用網路層級分析法進行專家問卷，取得評估因子之重要度及優先順序，建立學校災害管理評估指標系統，包含：「環境掌握」、「學校能力」、「校園防災地圖」、「相關資源導入」、「韌性防災教育推動」等5大面向37項指標。結果發現，學校災害管理作為首重韌性防災教育之推動，尤其演練之實施，其次為學校能力之建立，核心重點在學校行政主管之支持。最後以28所學校進行個案探討。建議學校可藉由本評估指標系統的定期檢視、確認各項災害管理工作，提升學校因應災害的韌性。

The incidence and impact of natural disasters have significantly increased in recent years. Global disaster management strategies have started to emphasize the establishment of social resilience to disasters. Schools play a decisive role not only in developing thoughts on disaster management, but as sources of community's knowledge source about disaster. This is a continuous study, which focuses on school disaster management to help schools identify the entirety of disaster management work, enhance its resilience, and reduce the impact of disasters. Based on the framework of school disaster management established by Wang (2016), this study uses analytic network process to enable expert questionnaires to obtain the weight and priority of the evaluation factor, and revises an assessment indicator system for school disaster management with 37 indicators covering five major dimensions: environmental familiarity, school capability, school disaster management map, external resource importation, and disaster resilience education. Analytical results indicate that the most important factor in the establishment of school disaster resilience is the promotion of disaster resilience education, the Hybrid Control Post Exercise implementation in particular. This is followed by determining the school capacity establishment, especially with support from school administrators. Based on the evaluation of 28 schools, this study concludes that using the indicator system regularly to inspect and verify various disaster management tasks in schools will enhance their disaster resilience in the future.

1. ActionAid(2009).ActionAid (2009). Disaster Risk Reduction through Schools: A Groundbreaking Project, Johannesburg: ActionAid International..
2. Consortium for Disaster Education (2011). A framework of school-based disaster preparedness developed by Consortium for Disaster Education Indonesia, PreventionWeb, http://www.preventionweb.net/files/26013_26008aframeworkofschoolbaseddisaste.pdf, Nov. 4, 2019.
3. De Sherbinin, A.,Schiller, A.,Pulsipher, A.(2007).The vulnerability of global cities to climate hazards.Environment and Urbanization,19(1),39-64.
4. Delhi Disaster Management Authority (DDMA) (2000). School disaster management plan, PreventionWeb, http://www.preventionweb.net/files/5449_SchoolDisasterManagementPlanIndia.pdf, Nov. 4, 2019.
5. Global Alliance for Disaster Risk Reduction & Resilience in the Education Sector (GADRRRES) (2015). CSS targets and indicators and concept note for phase two, PreventionWeb, https://www.preventionweb.net/publications/view/69304, Nov. 4, 2019.
6. GoI-UNDP (2006). Handout on school safety programme, PreventionWeb, http://www.preventionweb.net/files/8074_GoISchoolSafetyProgramme.pdf, Nov. 4, 2019.
7. Haroff, K. T.,Moore, K. K.(2007).Global climate change and the national environmental policy act.University of San Francisco Law Review,42,155-184.
8. Hatch, M.T.(2007).The Europeanization of German climate change policy.EUSA Tenth Biennial International Conference,Montreal:
9. Hosseini, M.,Izadkhah, Y. O.(2006).Earthquake disaster risk management planning in schools.Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal,15(4),649-661.
10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change=IPCC(2013).Climate change 2013: The physical science basis-summary for policymakers.IPCC Working Group.
11. International Finance Corporation (IFC) (2010). Disaster and emergency preparedness: guidance for schools, Prevention Web, http://www.preventionweb.net/files/13989_ifcdisasteremergencyhandbook63010.pdf, Nov. 4, 2019.
12. Johnson, V. A.,Ronan, K. R.,Johnston, D. M.,Peace, R.(2014).Evaluations of disaster education programs for children: A methodological review.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,9,107-123.
13. McCright, A. M.,Dunlap, R. E.(2003).Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy.Social Problems,50(3),348-373.
14. National Development and Reform Commission, People’s Republic of China (2007). China’s national climate change programm, Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China to the UN, http://www.china-un.org/eng/gyzg/t626117.htm, Nov. 4, 2019.
15. Revi, A.(2008).Climate change risk: An adaptation and mitigation agenda for Indian cities.Environment and Urbanization,20(1),207-229.
16. Saaty, T. L.(1977).A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.Journal of mathematical psychology,15(3),234-281.
17. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The Analytic Hierarchy Process.New York:McGrae-Hill.
18. UNESCO (2013). Comprehensive school safety, UNESCO, http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/Comprehensive_school_safety.pdf, Nov. 4, 2019.
19. UNISDR (2010). School emergency and disaster preparedness: guidance note, UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, http://www.unisdr.org/files/15655_1msshguidenotesprefinal0313101.pdf, Nov. 4, 2019.
20. UNISDR(2015).UNISDR (2015). Sendi Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, Geneva: United Nations..
21. United Nations (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the Convention on Climate Change, Kyoto: United Nations.
22. United Nations (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Rio: United Nations.
23. Wang, J.J.(2012).Integrated model combined land-use planning and disaster management- The structure, context and contents.Disaster Prevention and Management,21(1),110-123.
24. Wang, J.J.(2016).Study on the context of school disaster management.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,19,224-234.
25. Yamazaki, Y.,Özmen, B.,Ergünay, O.,Kaneko, F.,Miyazaki, R.(2017).Development and its dissemination of school disaster and emergency management plan in the republic of Turkey.16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017
26. Zantal-Wiener, K.,Horwood, T. J.(2010).Logic modeling as a tool to prepare to evaluate disaster and emergency preparedness, response, and recovery in schools.New Directions for Evaluation,126,51-64.
27. 王价巨,許庭語,楊怡瑩(2011)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告,臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。
28. 王价巨,單信瑜,馬士元,馬國宸,何宗龍,蔡寧又,盧彥佑,許伃婷,林彥蓁,徐宇涵(2018)。,臺北:教育部。
29. 王价巨,單信瑜,馬士元,陳以恩(2017)。,臺北:教育部。
30. 吳宜昭,龔楚媖,王安翔,于宜強(2016)。台灣地區短延時強降雨事件氣候特性分析。國家災害防救科技中心災害防救電子報，132
31. 教育部（2019），建構韌性防災校園與防災科技資源應用計畫，「教育部全球資訊網」，https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&s=FDA3C5B5499E63E3，2019 年 1 月 15 日。
32. 教育部(2017)。教育部（2017），「107年度教育部補助「直轄市及縣（市）政府辦理防災教育計畫」暨「高級中等以下學校防災校園建置計畫」作業說明」，臺北：教育部。
33. 教育部(2014)。教育部（2014），「教育部防災校園網絡建置與實驗計畫－100 年∼103 年成果冊」，臺北：教育部。
34. 教育部(2018)。教育部（2018），「教育部學校防減災及氣候變遷調適教育精進計畫－ 104 至 107 年成果冊」，臺北：教育部。
35. 陳建忠(2012)。臺北，大同大學工程學院工程管理碩士在職專班。
36. 賴豐升(2009)。臺中，國立勤益科技大學流通管理系碩士在職專班。