题名

以象徵宰制觀點探討道路命名：以台南市和高雄市路名為例

并列篇名

A Symbolic Domination Perspective of Road Naming: Evidence from Tainan and Kaohsiung City

DOI

10.6128/CP.202006_47(2).0003

作者

黃秋華(Chiu-Hua Huang)；陸偉明(Wei-Ming Luh)

关键词

布爾迪厄 ； 名制 ； 象徵資本分配 ； Bourdieu ； Distribution of symbolic capital ； Naming system

期刊名称

都市與計劃

卷期/出版年月

47卷2期（2020 / 06 / 30）

页次

173 - 187

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文藉由Bourdieu的象徵宰制觀點，來探討台灣路名背後所隱含的性別分類，以顯示社會透過道路命名所建構的性別宰制。研究對象為小學二（61位）、四（57位）、六（63位）年級學童，根據學童分別對台南市（70個）與高雄市（76個）路名的性別判斷結果，來分析學童是否在社會化的過程中，隨著年齡增長而有清楚的性別界線。以六年級學童判斷結果來看，台南市與高雄市的路名分別有81.4%、76.3%被判斷為男性，且比例最高的路名主要以賦有權力地位與代表公共事務的象徵用字，例如「通」、「興」以及華人文化象徵君王的「龍」；判斷為女性路名比例最高的名字用字多以珍玩寶物、順服節制的象徵，例如「美」、「惠」、「秀」。另外，隨著年齡愈大，台灣學童將路名判斷為男性名字的比例愈高。二年級學童判斷為女性或中性路名者，到了四年級則翻轉為男性路名，顯示學童在社會化過程中已經習得兩性秉性期待的分類。由於路名也可以是一種象徵資本，故本文根據結果提出未來在道路命名的相關建議。
英文摘要

This study explored the gender classifications of road names in Taiwan from the perspective of Bourdieu's symbolic domination. The participants were 61 second-graders, 57 fourth-graders and 63 sixth-graders recruited from elementary schools. Seventy and 76 names of roads in Tainan and Kaohsiung City, respectively, were used to investigate whether students have a clear gender classification for those road names. The sixth-graders judged 81.4% and 76.3% of the road names as male in Tainan City and Kaohsiung City, respectively, forming a man-made environment. The highest percentage of road names were mainly symbolic words that gave power and represented public affairs in the Chinese culture. The few road names that were judged as female and those names symbolized beauty, obedience and temperance, showing femininity. Additionally, as age increased, the percentage of participants who judged road name as male got higher. The analytical results show that children have acquired gender classifications in the process of socialization. Since the representation of road names can also be considered as building symbolic capital, suggestions for the future road naming has provided to reduce gender domination.
主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. 李廣均(2007)。志明和春嬌：為何兩「性」的名字總是有「別」?。台灣社會學，12，1-67。
    連結：
  2. 邱天助(2007)。國家意志下，人文社會學術生產的再反思：Bourdieu 場域分析的啟示。圖書資訊學研究，2(1)，1-19。
    連結：
  3. 孫瑞穗(2005)。女性主義的空間再思：從女性主義理論化中的性別。婦研縱橫，74，56-63。
    連結：
  4. 曹壽民,羅孝賢(2014)。論城市街道命名。都市交通，29(2)，1-10。
    連結：
  5. 黃雯娟(2014)。臺北市街道命名的空間政治。地理學報，73，79-105。
    連結：
  6. 葉韻翠(2013)。批判地名學－國家與地方、族群的對話。地理學報，68，69-87。
    連結：
  7. Alderman, D. H.(2003).Street names and the scaling of memory: The politics of commemorating Martn Luther King, Jr within the African American community.Area,35(2),163-173.
  8. Azaryahu, M.(1997).German reunification and the politics of street names: The case of East Berlin.Political Geography,16(6),479-493.
  9. Azaryahu, M.(1996).The power of commemorative street names.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,14(3),311-330.
  10. Bourdieu, P.(2001).Masculine Domination.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  11. Bourdieu, P.(1989).Social space and symbolic power.Sociological Theory,7(1),14-25.
  12. Bourdieu, P.,Wacquant, L. J. D.(1992).An Invitation to Reflective Sociology.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  13. Herod, A.(1997).Labor’s spatial praxis and the geography of contract bargaining in the US East Coast longshore industry,1953–89.Political Geography,16(2),145-169.
  14. Kearns, R.,Berg, L.(2009).Proclaiming place: Towards a geography of place name pronunciation.Critical Toponymies: The Contested Politics of Place Naming,England:
  15. Kohlberg, L.(1966).A cognitive-developmental analysis of children’s sex-role concepts and attitudes.The Development of Sex Differences,Stanford, CA:
  16. Lee, J. K. F.,Collins, P.(2008).Gender voices in Hong Kong English textbooks-some past and current practices.Sex Roles,59(1-2),127-137.
  17. Light, D.(2004).Street names in Bucharest, 1990-1997: Exploring the modern historical geographies of post-socialist change.Journal of Historical Geography,30(1),154-172.
  18. Marston, S, A.(2000).The social construction of scale.Progress in Human Geography,24(2),219-242.
  19. Mitchell, D.(2002).Controlling space, controlling scale: Migratory labour, free speech, and regional development in the American West.Journal of Historical Geography,28(1),63-84.
  20. Pfukwa, C.(2018).(Re)writing an urban landscape: street names in Harare’s CBD after 1980.Journal of African Onomastics,32(1),37-45.
  21. Rose-Redwood, R.,Alderman, D.,Azaryahu, M.(2010).Geographies of toponymic inscription: New directions in critical place-name studies.Progress in Human Geography,34(4),453-470.
  22. Seidl, N. P.(2008).Significance of toponyms, with emphasis on field names, for studying cultural landscape.Acta Geographica Slovenica,48(1),33-56.
  23. Shackleton, C. M.(2018).Urban street names: An opportunity to examine biocultural relationships?.PLoS ONE,13(7)
  24. Yeoh, B. S. A.(1992).Street names in colonial Singapore.Geographical Review,82(3),313-322.
  25. 王志弘（譯）,張淑玫（譯）,魏親嘉（譯）,Weisman, L. K.(1997).設計的歧視：男造環境的女性主義批判.臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司.
  26. 吳育臻(2015)。從地名的變遷看不同政權的特質－以嘉義市區街路地名為例。白沙歷史地理學報，16，107-143。
  27. 林修澈(1976)。名制的結構。東方雜誌，10(2)，52-61。
  28. 陳皎眉(1996)。性別認同與性別角色。兩性關係，臺北:
  29. 黃雯娟(2014)。命名的規範：臺南市街路命名的文化政治。臺灣史研究，21(4)，147-186。
  30. 廖秋娥(2004)。地名權的歷史地理面向—以台東市的街道名稱為例。語言人權與語言復振學術研討會論文集，臺東:
print cancel